|
Volumn 114, Issue 13-14, 2002, Pages 551-556
|
Comparison of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and two different polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) for species identification of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato strains
a a a |
Author keywords
Borrelia burgdorferi; Polymerase chain reaction; Pulsed field gel electrophoresis; Species identification
|
Indexed keywords
DNA FRAGMENT;
GENE PRODUCT;
RESTRICTION ENDONUCLEASE;
RNA 16S;
ARTICLE;
BACTERIUM ISOLATION;
BORRELIA AFZELII;
BORRELIA BURGDORFERI;
BORRELIA GARINII;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
NONHUMAN;
POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;
PULSED FIELD GEL ELECTROPHORESIS;
SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;
SPECIES IDENTIFICATION;
ANIMAL;
CLASSIFICATION;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
GENETIC HETEROGENEITY;
GENETICS;
HUMAN;
LYME DISEASE;
METHODOLOGY;
MICROBIOLOGY;
SLOVENIA;
SPECIES DIFFERENCE;
TICK;
ANIMAL;
BORRELIA BURGDORFERI;
BORRELIA BURGDORFERI GROUP;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
ELECTROPHORESIS, GEL, PULSED-FIELD;
GENETIC HETEROGENEITY;
HUMAN;
LYME DISEASE;
POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;
RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S;
SLOVENIA;
SPECIES SPECIFICITY;
TICKS;
ANIMALS;
HUMANS;
|
EID: 0037205669
PISSN: 00435325
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (3)
|
References (26)
|