Nonequilibrium Transport through Double Quantum Dots: Kondo Effect versus Antiferromagnetic Coupling

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 89, Issue 13, 2002, Pages

  López, Rosa ^a   Aguado, Ramón ^a   Platero, Gloria ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE CIENCIA DE MATERIALES DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIFERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTANCE; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; MAGNETIC COUPLINGS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; PHASE DIAGRAMS; PHASE TRANSITIONS;

ANTIFERROMAGNETIC COUPLINGS;

SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

EID: 0037163827     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.136802     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. For a review see, Leo P. Kouwenhoven et al, in Mesoscopic Electron Transport, edited by L.L. Sohn, L.P. Kouwenhoven, and G. Schön (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997).
2. A.C. Hewson, The Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1993).
3. T.K. Ng and P.A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1768 61, 1768 (1988);
4. L.I. Glazman and M.E. Raikh, JETP Lett.JTPLA2 47, 452 (1988).
5. D. Goldhaber-Gordon et al, Nature (London)10.1038/34373 391, 156 (1998);
6. D. Goldhaber-Gordon et al, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5225 81, 5225 (1998);
7. S.M. Cronenwett et al, Science 281, 540 (1998);
8. J. Schmid et al, Physica (Amsterdam)PHYBE3 256-258B, 182 (1998);
9. J. Schmid
10. W. Van der Wiel et al, Science10.1126/science.289.5487.2105 289, 2105 (2000);
11. S. Sasaki et al, Nature (London)10.1038/35015509 405, 764 (2000).
12. T.H. Oosterkamp et al, Nature (London)10.1038/27617 395, 873 (1998);
13. T. Fujisawa et al, Science 282, 932 (1998);
14. R.H. Blick et al, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4032 80, 4032 (1998).
15. For recent experiments see H. Jeong et al, Science 293, 2221 (2001).
16. See, e.g., Vitaly N. Golovach and Daniel Loss, cond-mat/0201437.
17. A. Georges and Y. Meir, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3508 82, 3508 (1999).
18. B.A. Jones et al, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.125 61, 125 (1988);
19. B.A. Jones
20. B.A. Jones et al, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.39.3415 39, 3415 (1989).
21. O. Sakai and Y. Shimizu, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 61, 2333 (1992);
22. O. SakaiY. ShimizuJ. Phys. Soc. Jpn.61, 2348 (1992).
23. T. Aono and M. Eto, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.63.125327 63, 125327 (2001).
24. Ramón Aguado and David C. Langreth, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1946 85, 1946 (2000).
25. W.zumida and O.Sakai, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.62.10260 62, 10?260 (2000);
26. C.A. Büsser et al, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.62.9907 62, 9907 (2000).
27. P. Coleman, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.29.3035 29, 3035 (1984).
28. U. Wilhelm and J. Weis, Physica (Amsterdam) 6E, 668 (2000);
29. A.W. Holleitner et al, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.256802 87, 256802 (2001).
30. For recent experiments see I.H. Chan et al, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 1818 (2002).
31. In this language, the singlet state can be represented by a bond between the two sites. See, e.g., Ian Affleck and J.B. Marston, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.37.3774 37, 3774 (1988).
32. D.C. Langreth, in Linear and Nonlinear Electron Transport in Solids, edited by J.T. Devreese and V.E. Van Doren, Nato ASI, Ser. B, Vol. 17 (Plenum, New York, 1976).
33. Y. Meir and Ned S. Wingreen, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2512 68, 2512 (1992).