Toward a computational tool predicting the stereochemical outcome of asymmetric reactions. 1. Application to sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 67, Issue 21, 2002, Pages 7275-7282

  Moitessier, Nicolas ^a   Henry, Christophe ^a   Len, Christophe ^b   Chapleur, Yves ^a  

^a NANCY UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE PICARDIE JULES VERNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASYMMETRIC REACTION;

GENETIC ALGORITHMS; HYDROXYLATION; ISOMERS;

STEREOCHEMISTRY;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL REACTION; DIASTEREOISOMER; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; GENETICS; HYDROXYLATION; METHODOLOGY; STEREOCHEMISTRY;

EID: 0037131196     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo0258148     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. (a) Jacobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A., Yamamoto, H., Eds. Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis; Springer: New York, 1999; Vols. 1-3.
2. (b) Noyori, R. Asymmetric Catalysis in Organic Synthesis; Wiley & Sons: New York, 1999.
3. For a recent example, see: Cui, M.; Adam, W.; Shen, J. H.; Luo, X. M.; Tan, X. J.; Chen, K. X.; Ji, R. Y.; Jiang, H. L. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 1427-1435.
4. (a) Klebe, G. J. Mol. Med. 2000, 78, 269-281.
5. (b) Kubinyi, H. Curr. Opin. Drug. Discov. Dev. 1998, 1, 4-15.
6. (a) Hanessian, S.; Moitessier, N.; Therrien, E. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2001, 15, 873-881,
7. (b) Hanessian, S.; Moitessier, N.; Cantin, L.-D. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 6885-6900.
8. (c) Hanessian, S.; MacKay, D. B.; Moitessier, N. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 3074-3082.
9. Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Halliday, R. S.; Huey, R.; Hart, W. E.; Belew, R. K.; Olson, A. J. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 1639-1662.
10. Ewing, T. J. A.; Kuntz, I. D. J. Comput. Chem. 1997, 18, 1175 and references therein.
11. Kolb, H. C.; VanNieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless, K. B. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 2483-2547.
12. (a) Ewing, D. F.; Fahmi, N.-E.; Len, C.; Mackenzie, G.; Pranzo, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 3561-3565.
13. (b) Ewing, D. F.; Len, C.; Mackenzie, G.; Ronco, G.; Villa, P. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 4995-5002.
14. (c) Pilard, S.; Riboul, D.; Glaçon, V.; Moitessier, N.; Chapleur, Y.; Postel, D.; Len, C. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13, 529-537.
15. (a) Moitessier, N.; Chrétien, F.; Chapleur, Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 2889-2892.
16. (b) Roussel, F.; Moitessier, N.; Hilly, M.; Chrétien, F.; Mauger, J.-P.; Chapleur, Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 759-768.
17. (a) Moitessier, N.; Maigret, B.; Chrétien, F.; Chapleur, Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 995-1005.
18. (b) Mnemonic device predicts the outcome of AD on similar substrates; see, for example: Dominique, R.; Roy, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 395-398.
19. (a) Wu, Y.-D.; Wang, Y.; Houk, K. N. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 1362-1369.
20. (b) Norrby, P.-O.; Kolb, H. C.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 8470-8478.
21. (c) Norrby, P.-O.; Rasmussen, T.; Haller, J.; Strassner, T.; Houk, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10186-10192.
22. (d) Ujaque, G.; Maseras, F.; Lledos, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1317-1323.
23. During the course of our work, synthetic investigations on substrate binding were reported. Bayer, A.; Svendsen, J. S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 1769-1780.
24. QM/MM accuracy can be reached using carefully parametrized force fields. Nonbonded interactions, which are extremely important in differentiating paths in asymmetric synthesis, are problematic in most QM approaches but well described by empirical parameters. Norrby, P.-O. Private communication.
25. For an excellent account of enantiodiscriminating binding, see: Lipkowitz, K. B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 555-562.
26. (a) Corey, E. J.; Noe, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 12579-12580.
27. (b) Corey, E. J.; Noe, M.; Sarshar, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 2861-2864.
28. (c) Corey, E. J.; Noe, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 319-329.
29. Kollman, P. A.; Masova, I.; Reyes, C.; Kuhn, B.; Huo, S.; Chong, L.; Lee, M.; Lee, T.; Duan, Y.; Donini, O.; Cieplak, P.; Srinivasan, J.; Case, D. A.; Cheatham, T. E., III. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 889-897.
30. Orozco, M.; Luque, F. J. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 4187-4225.
31. (a) Corey, E. J.; Noe, M. C.; Grogan, M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 4899-4902.
32. (b) Pidun, U.; Boehme, C.; Frenking, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2817-2820.
33. (c) Dapprich, S.; Ujaque, G.; Maseras, F.; Lledos, A.; Musaev, D. G.; Morokuma, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11660-11661.
34. (d) Torrent, M.; Deng, L.; Duran, M.; Sola, M.; Ziegler, T. Organometallics 1997, 199, 13-19.
35. (e) DelMonte, A. J.; Haller, J.; Houk, K. N.; Sharpless, K. B.; Singleton, D. A.; Strassner, T.; Thomas, A. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9907-9908.
36. (f) Haller, J.; Strassner, T.; Houk, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8031-8034.
37. Westhead, D. R.; Clark, D. E.; Murray, C. W. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 209-228.
38. For a discussion of these models, see: Becker, H.; Ho, P. T.; Kolb, H. C.; Loren, S.; Norrby, P.-O.; Sharpless, K. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 7315-7318.
39. Wang, Z.-M.; Kakiuchi, K.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 6895-6897.
40. Vanhessche, K. P. M.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 7978-7979.
41. Shao, H.; Rueter, J. K.; Goodman, M. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 5240-5244.
42. Hashiyama, T.; Morikawa, K.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 5067-5068.
43. Kolb, H. C.; Andersson, P. G.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1278-1291.
44. (a) Seebach, D.; Aebi, J. D.; Gander-Coquoz, M.; Naef, R. Helv. Chim. Acta. 1987, 70, 1194-1216.
45. (b) Moon, S.-H.; Ohfune, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7405-7406.
46. 26a However, Seebach had disclosed the (2R,3R)- and (2S,3S)-α-methylthreonines but neither (2R,3S) nor (2S,3R) that were expected by Goodman's approach.
47. 2: Corey, E. J.; Guzman-Perez, A.; Noe, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 12109-12110.
48. Kamishima, M.; Kojima, M.; Yoshikawa, Y. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 835-845.
49. Mehltretter, G. M.; Döbler, C.; Sundermeier, U.; Beller, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 8083-8087.