|
Volumn 89, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 679-685
|
Differentiation between LQT1 and LQT2 patients and unaffected subjects using 24-hour electrocardiographic recordings
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
AMBULATORY MONITORING;
ARTICLE;
AUTOANALYSIS;
CHILD;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
COMPUTER PROGRAM;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS;
DISEASE CLASSIFICATION;
ELECTROCARDIOGRAM;
FEMALE;
GENOTYPE;
HOLTER MONITORING;
HUMAN;
LONG QT SYNDROME;
LONG QT SYNDROME TYPE 1;
LONG QT SYNDROME TYPE 2;
MALE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QT INTERVAL;
RR INTERVAL;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
CHILD;
CIRCADIAN RHYTHM;
DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL;
ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY, AMBULATORY;
FEMALE;
GENOTYPE;
HEART CONDUCTION SYSTEM;
HUMANS;
LONG QT SYNDROME;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 0037086292
PISSN: 00029149
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9149(01)02339-6 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (32)
|
References (24)
|