Diagnostic impact of four postprocessing techniques in evaluating contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 170, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 907-912

  Hany, Thomas F ^a   Schmidt, Michaela ^a   Davis, Clarence P ^a   Göhde, Susanne C ^a   Debatin, Jörg F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0031897096     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.170.4.9530032     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Harrison DC, Geller SC. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:877-881
2. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 1994;191:155-164
3. Leung DA, McKinnon GC, Davis CP, et al. Breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 1996;200:569-571
4. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 1995;197:785-792
5. Edelman RR, Wentz KU, Mattle H, et al. Projection arteriography and venography: initial clinical results with MR. Radiology 1989;172:351-357
6. Murakami T, Kashiwagi T, Nakamura H, et al. Display of MR angiograms: maximum intensity projection versus three-dimensional rendering. Eur J Radiol 1993;17:95-100
7. Shapiro LB, Tien RD, Golding SJ, Totterman SM. Preliminary results of a modified surface rendering technique in the display of magnetic resonance angiography images. Magn Reson Imaging 1994;12:461-468
8. Davis CP, Ladd ME, Romanowski BJ, et al. Human aorta: preliminary results with virtual endoscopy based on three-dimensional MR imaging data sets. Radiology 1996;199:37-40
9. Many TF, McKinnon GC, Leung DA, Pfammatter T, Debatin JF. Optimization of contrast timing for breath-hold 3D MR-angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:552-557
10. Constable RT, Skudlarski P, Gore JC. An ROC approach for evaluating functional brain MR imaging and postprocessing protocols. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:57-64
11. Earls JP, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC. Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector. Radiology 1996;201:705-710
12. Wasser MN, Westenberg J, van der Hulst VP, et al. Hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis: digital subtraction angiography versus systolically gated three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1997;202:333-338
13. Anderson CM, Saloner D, Tsuruda JS, Shapeero LG, Lee RE. Artifacts in maximum-intensity-projection display of MR angiograms. AJR 1990; 154:623-629
14. Meyers SP, Talagala SL, Totterman S, et al. Evaluation of the renal arteries in kidney donors: value of three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography with maximum-intensity-projection or surface rendering. AJR 1995;164:117-121
15. Rubin GD, Alfrey EJ, Dake MD, et al. Assessment of living renal donors with spiral CT. Radialogy 1995;195:457-462