Molecular glasses with high fictive temperatures for energy landscape evaluations

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 106, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 1069-1080

  Velikov, V ^a   Borick, S ^a   Angell, C A ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTROSPRAYING; MOLECULAR GLASSES;

CHEMICAL RELAXATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; ENTHALPY; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; QUENCHING; VISCOSITY;

GLASS;

EID: 0037034410     PISSN: 10895647     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp012001z     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Goldstein, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1969, 51, 3728.
2. Stillinger, F.H.; Weber, T.A. Science 1984, 228, 983.
3. (a) Stillinger, F.H. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 80, 2742.
4. (b) Stillinger, F.H. Science 1995, 267, 1935.
5. Sastry, S.; Debenedetti, P.G.; Stillinger, F.H. Nature 1998, 393, 554-557.
6. Scala, A.; Starr, F.; La Nave, E.; Sciortino, F.; Stanley, H.E. Nature 2000, 406, 166.
7. Sastry, S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 590-593.
8. Speedy, R.J. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 102, 4060-4065.
9. Sciortino, F.; Kob, W.; Tartaglia, P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 3214-3217.
10. Keyes, T. J. Phys. Chem. 1997, 101, 2921; J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 5081.
11. Keyes, T. J. Phys. Chem. 1997, 101, 2921; J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 5081.
12. Donati, C.; Sciortino, F.; Tartaglia, P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 1464.
13. Saika-Voivod, I.; Poole, P.H.; Sciortino, F. Nature 2001, 412, 514-517.
14. Angell, C.A.; Clarke, J.H.R.; Woodcock, L.V. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1981, 48, 397-453. Angell, C.A. Science 1995, 267, 1924.
15. Angell, C.A.; Clarke, J.H.R.; Woodcock, L.V. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1981, 48, 397-453. Angell, C.A. Science 1995, 267, 1924.
16. (a) Horbach, J.; Kob, W. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 60, 3169.
17. (b) Horbach, J.; Kob, W.; Binder, K. Philos. Mag. B 1998, 77, 297.
18. Starr, F.; Stanley, H.E., work in progress.
19. Hemmati, M.; Moynihan, C.T.; Angell, C.A. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 6663-6671.
20. Angell, C.A. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2000, 12, 6463.
21. Martinez, L.-M.; Angell, C.A. Nature 2001, 410, 663.
22. (a) Ediger, M.D.; Angell, C.A.; Nagel, Sidney R. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 13200.
23. (b) Angell, C.A.; Ngai, K.L.; McKenna, G.B.; McMillan, P.F.; Martin, S.W. Rev. Appl. Phys. 2000, 88, 3113.
24. Rössler, E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1990, 65, 1595.
25. Götze, W. In Liquids, Freezing, and the Glass Transition; Hansen, J.-P., Levesque, D., Eds.; NATO Advanced Study Institute; North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1989; pp 287-503.
26. Angell, C.A. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1988, 49 (8), 863.
27. Rössler, E.; Sokolov, A. P. Chem. Geol. 1996, 128, 143.
28. Sokolov, A. Endeavor 1997, 21, 109.
29. Mayer, E. Cryoletters 1988, 9, 66; J. Microsc. 1985, 140, 3; J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 3474.
30. Mayer, E. Cryoletters 1988, 9, 66; J. Microsc. 1985, 140, 3; J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 3474.
31. Mayer, E. Cryoletters 1988, 9, 66; J. Microsc. 1985, 140, 3; J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 3474.
32. Huang, J.; Gupta, P. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1992, 151, 175-181.
33. Chen, H.S.; Turnbull, D. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1967, 10, 284.
34. Suck, J.B.; Rudin, H. In Glassy Metals II; Beck, H., Guntherodt, H.-J., Eds.; Springer Tracts in Applied Physics; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 1983; Vol. 53, p 217.
35. (a) Zhang, T.; Inoue, A.; Matsumoto, T. Mater. Trans. JIM 1991, 32, 1005.
36. (b) Pecker, A.; Johnson, W.L. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1993, 63, 2342. Johnson, W. Mater. Sci. Forum 1996, 225, 35.
37. (b) Pecker, A.; Johnson, W.L. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1993, 63, 2342. Johnson, W. Mater. Sci. Forum 1996, 225, 35.
38. Tang, X.P.; Geyer, U.; Busch, R.; Johnson, W.L.; Wu, Y. Nature 1999, 402, 160.
39. Chen, H.S.; Coleman, E. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1976, 28 (5), 245.
40. Suck, J.B. In Dynamics of Amorphous Materials; Richter, D., Dianoux, A.J., Petry, W., Teixera, J., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, Germany, 1989; p 18232.
41. Suck, J.B. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2001, 293, 370.
42. (a) Perera, D.N. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1999, 11 3807.
43. (b) Busch, R.; Bakke, E.; Johnson, W.L. Acta Mater. 1998, 46: 13, 4725.
44. Drexhage, M.G.; Moynihan, C.T.; Saley-Boulos, M.; Quilan, K.P. Physics of Fibre Optics; Bendow, B., Mitra, J., Eds.; Advances in Ceramics; American Ceramic Society: Columbus, OH; Vol. II, p 57.
45. Moynihan, C.T. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY. Private communication.
46. (a) Moynihan, C.T.; Easteal, A.J.; DeBolt, M.A.; Tucker, J. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1976, 59, 12.
47. (b) Moynihan, C.T. In Assignment of the Glass Transition; Seyler, R.J., Ed.; ASTM STP 1249; American Society for Testing and Materials: Philadelphia, PA, 1994; pp 32-49. We should note an apparent problem in this construction. It is assumed therein that the difference in heat capacity between glass and liquid is entirely configurational, whereas in fact it is partly vibrational (M. Goldstein, J. Chem. Phys., 1976, 64, 4767; L.M. Martinez and C.A. Angell, Nature, 2001, 410, 663). The reason that this does not lead to an underestimate of the fictive temperature is that the vibrational component has already separated itself from the excess enthalpy of the quenched glass, during the quench, by virtue of its short relaxation time.
48. (b) Moynihan, C.T. In Assignment of the Glass Transition; Seyler, R.J., Ed.; ASTM STP 1249; American Society for Testing and Materials: Philadelphia, PA, 1994; pp 32-49. We should note an apparent problem in this construction. It is assumed therein that the difference in heat capacity between glass and liquid is entirely configurational, whereas in fact it is partly vibrational (M. Goldstein, J. Chem. Phys., 1976, 64, 4767; L.M. Martinez and C.A. Angell, Nature, 2001, 410, 663). The reason that this does not lead to an underestimate of the fictive temperature is that the vibrational component has already separated itself from the excess enthalpy of the quenched glass, during the quench, by virtue of its short relaxation time.
49. (b) Moynihan, C.T. In Assignment of the Glass Transition; Seyler, R.J., Ed.; ASTM STP 1249; American Society for Testing and Materials: Philadelphia, PA, 1994; pp 32-49. We should note an apparent problem in this construction. It is assumed therein that the difference in heat capacity between glass and liquid is entirely configurational, whereas in fact it is partly vibrational (M. Goldstein, J. Chem. Phys., 1976, 64, 4767; L.M. Martinez and C.A. Angell, Nature, 2001, 410, 663). The reason that this does not lead to an underestimate of the fictive temperature is that the vibrational component has already separated itself from the excess enthalpy of the quenched glass, during the quench, by virtue of its short relaxation time.
50. Hodge, I.M. Macromolecules 1987, 20, 2897 and references therein. For an extended review on the subject of enthalpy relaxation studies, see: Hodge, I.M. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1994, 169 (3), 211.
51. Hodge, I.M. Macromolecules 1987, 20, 2897 and references therein. For an extended review on the subject of enthalpy relaxation studies, see: Hodge, I.M. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1994, 169 (3), 211.
52. Seyler, R.J., Ed. Assignment of the Glass Transition; ASTM STP 1249; American Society for Testing and Materials: Philadelphia, PA, 1994.
53. Velikov, V.; Lu, Q.; Angell, C.A., to be published.
54. (a) Angell, C.A. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 1996, 1 (4), 578-585.
55. Angell, C.A. The Glass Transition. In Encyclopedia of Materials Science and Engineering; Pergamon Press: Elmsford, NY; Vol. 4, pp 3565-3575.
56. Scherer, G.W.; Schultz, P.C. In Glass Science and Technology; Uhlmann, D.R., Kreidl, N.J., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 1983; Vol. 1.
57. Tatsumisago, H.; Hirai, K.; Minami, T.; Kondo, S. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 1993, 101, 1315.
58. Spaepen, F.; Turnbull, D. In Laser-Solid Interactions and Laser Processing 1978; Ferris, S.D., Leamy, H.J., Poate, J.M., Eds.; American Institute of Physics: Melville, NY, 1979; p 73.
59. Tammann, G.; Elbrachter, A. Anorg. Chem. 1935, 222, 371.
60. (a) Perel, J.; Mahoney, J.F.; Kalensher, B.E.; Vickers, K.E.; Mehrabian, R. Rapid Solidification Processes; Princeton Technology: Princeton, NJ, 1978; p 258.
61. (b) Holzmann, L.M.; Kelly, T.F.; Hitchon, W.N.G. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1994, 321, 233; Midwest Microsc. 1992, 21, 19.
62. (b) Holzmann, L.M.; Kelly, T.F.; Hitchon, W.N.G. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1994, 321, 233; Midwest Microsc. 1992, 21, 19.
63. (c) Kim, Y.W.; Lin, H.M.; Kelly, T.F. Acta Metall. 1989, 37, 247.
64. Smyth, D.P. Trans. Ind. Appl. IA 1986, 22527.
65. (a) Doshi J.; Reneker, D.H. J. Electrost. 1995, 35 (2-3), 151. Reneker, D.H.; Chun, I. Nanotechnology 1996, 7, 216.
66. (a) Doshi J.; Reneker, D.H. J. Electrost. 1995, 35 (2-3), 151. Reneker, D.H.; Chun, I. Nanotechnology 1996, 7, 216.
67. (b) Chun, I.; Reneker, D.H.; Fong, H.; Fang, X.; Deitzel, J.; Tan, N.B.; Kearns, K. J. Adv. Mater. 1999, 31 (1), 36.
68. Lord Rayleigh. Philos. Mag. J. 1882, 14 184.
69. Synthesiaed Mesophase Pitch AR; Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc.: New York, 2001 (new product brochure). Available in PDF format at http://www.mgc-a.com/newProducts/new.html.
70. Khandare, P.M.; Zondlo, J.W.; Pavlovic, A.S. Carbon 1996, 34:5, 663.
71. ARA-24 Viscosity data: Rheometrics parallel-plate viscometer, 10 rad/s, 50% strain, Ken Lindsay UDRI, 1996.
72. Laughlin, W.T.; Uhlmann, D.R. J. Phys. Chem. 1972, 76, 6 (16), 2317.
73. Arzimanoglou, A. Purdue University, 1984. Unpublished work.
74. Plazek, D.J.; Magill, J.H. J. Chem. Phys. 1966, 45 (8), 3038. McGill, J.H. J. Chem. Phys. 1967, 47, 2802.
75. Plazek, D.J.; Magill, J.H. J. Chem. Phys. 1966, 45 (8), 3038. McGill, J.H. J. Chem. Phys. 1967, 47, 2802.
76. Böhmer, R.; Angell, C.A. Phys. Rev. B. 1992, 45, 10091-10094.
77. Böhmer, R.; Ngai, K.L.; Angell, C.A.; Plazek, D.J. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99 (5), 4201-4209.
78. Borick, S. Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ. Unpublished results.
79. (a) Liedtke, V.; Huttinger, K.J. Carbon 1996, 34 (9), 1067.
80. (b) Kearns, K. Wright Patterson Air Force Research Laboratory, Dayton, OH. Private communication.
81. g values as high as 1.21. The exotherm form found by Yue is fully consistent with the picture presented here and represents the most precise study of this type yet performed. Comparable detail has been obtained in the study of a vapor-deposited molecular glass, butyronitrile, in the work of H. Fujimori and M. Oguni, J. Chem. Thermo., 1994, 26, 367.
82. g values as high as 1.21. The exotherm form found by Yue is fully consistent with the picture presented here and represents the most precise study of this type yet performed. Comparable detail has been obtained in the study of a vapor-deposited molecular glass, butyronitrile, in the work of H. Fujimori and M. Oguni, J. Chem. Thermo., 1994, 26, 367.
83. Kearns, A.J.; Polk, D.E.; Ray, R.; Giessen, B.C. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1979, 38, 49.
84. Sciortino, F.; Tartaglia, P. Europhys. Lett. 2000, 49, 590.
85. Richert, R.; Angell, C.A. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 9016.
86. Hansen, C.; Stickel, F.; Berger, T.; Richert, R.; Fischer, E.W. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 1086.
87. Fong, H.; Reniker, D.H. J. Polym. Sci. B: Polym. Phys. 1999, 37, 3488.
88. Oguni, M.; Angell, C.A. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 73, 1948.
89. Viscosity data in: Angell, C.A.; Bressel, R.D.; Green, J.L.; Kanno, H.; Oguni, M.; Sare, E.J. Int. J. Food Sci. 1994, 22, 115-142.
90. (a) Johari, G.P. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2000, 2, 1432.
91. (b) Angell, C.A.; Bressel, R.D.; Hemmatti, M.; Sare, E.J.; Tucker, J.C. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2000, 2, 1599-1566.
92. (c) Velikov, V.; Borick, S.; Angell, C.A. Science 2001, 294, 2335.