Short strong hydrogen bonds: A valence bond analysis

Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Volumn 106, Issue 22, 2002, Pages 5517-5520

  Humbel, Stéphane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE REIMS CHAMPAGNE ARDENNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MARCUS EQUATIONS; RESONATING BONDING STRUCTURES; TAYLOR SERIES; VALENCE BOND ANALYSIS;

BINDING ENERGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISSOCIATION; ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE; NUMERICAL METHODS; POTENTIAL ENERGY; PROTONS;

HYDROGEN BONDS;

EID: 0037030836     PISSN: 10895639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp0202789     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. (a) Gilli, G; Gilli, P. J. Mol. Struct. 2000, 552, 1-15.
2. (b) Jeffrey, G. A. An introduction to Hydrogen Bonding; Oxford University Press: New York, 1997.
3. (a) On weak hydrogen bonds (such as the water dimer) see Energy and Charge Distribution Decomposition; Morokuma, K. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 55, 1236-1244.
4. (b) The partition of the pertubative energy: Daudey, J. P. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1974, 8, 29-43.
5. (c) For a partition to analyze the difference between weak and short strong hydrogen bonds, Remer, L. C; Jensen, J. H. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 9266-9275.
6. (d) For a partition into charge transfer and resonance assistance, Guerra, C. F.; Bickelhaupt, F. M.; Snijders, J. G. Baerends, E. J. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 3581-3594.
7. Meot-Ner, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 1257-1264.
8. Larson, J. W.; McMahon, T. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 6255-6261.
9. (a) Zeegers-Huyskens, T. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1986, 129, 172-175.
10. (b) Zeegers-Huyskens, T. J. Mol. Struct. 1988, 177, 125-141.
11. (a) Davidson, W. R.; Sunner, J.; Kebarle P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 1675-1680.
12. (b) Desmeules, P. J.; Allen L. C. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 4731-4748.
13. Scheiner, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 315-320.
14. For an elegant discussion on the origin of the barrier height, Goez, M.; Heun R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 37, 3052-3054.
15. Solvation and tunnelling effect further complicate this question. (a) Marx, D.; Tuckerman, M. E.; J.; Hutter, Parinello, M. Nature 1999, 397, 601-604.
16. (b) Imura, K.; Ohoyama, H.; Naaman R.; Che, D.-C.; Hashinokuchi, M.; Kasai, T. J. Mol. Struct. 2000, 552, 137-145.
17. (c) Zundel, G. J. Mol. Struct. 2000, 552, 81-86.
18. (a) Vishveshwara, S.; Madhusudhan, M. S.; Maizel, J. V., Jr. Biophysical Chemistry 2001, 89, 105-117.
19. (b) Vishveshwara, S.; Madhusudhan, M. S.; Maizel, J. V., Jr. J. Mol. Struct. 2000, 552, 97-109. It should be noted here that conformational restrictions are not expected to lead to stronger hydrogen bonds, they only act on the barrier height of the proton transfer.
20. (a) For a recent review on the hydrogen bonding in the solid state, Steiner, T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2002, 41, 48-76.
21. For more specific analysis see for instance (b) Harris, T. K.; Zhao, Q.; Mildvan, A.S. J. Mol. Struct. 2000, 552, 97-109.
22. (c) Grabowski, S. J.; Pogorzelska, M. J. Mol. Struct. 2001, 559, 201-207.
23. (d) Madsen, G. K. H.; Wilson, C.; Nymand, T. M.; McIntyre, G. J.; Larsen, F. K. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 8684-8690.
24. A slope of 0.5 has been attributed to the equal sharing of the proton between the two basis (ref 4). Different slopes for the linear correlations (b, in eq 2) have been obtained for a variety of nonsymmetrical systems by Meot-Ner et al.; they range from 0.16 up to 0.43.
25. +... O, b = 0.30 see ref 3.
26. +...N≡C, b = 0.43.
27. Speller, C. V.; Meot-Ner, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 5217-5222.
28. +...O, b = 0.25. Meot-Ner, M; Sieck, L. W.; Koretke K. K.; Deakyne, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10430-10438.
29. +...O, b = 0.16 Meot-Ner, M; Sieck L. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 5222-5225.
30. (a) Marcus, R. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1968, 72, 891-899.
31. (b) Cohen, A. O.; Marcus, R. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1968, 72, 4249-4256.
32. (a) Scheiner, S.; Redfern, P. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 2969-74.
33. (b) Magnoli, D. E.; Murdoch, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 7465-7469 and references therein.
34. Humbel, S; Hoffmann, N.; Côte, I.; Bouquant, J. J. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 1592-1600.
35. Hiberty, P. C.; Humbel, S.; Archirel, P. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 11697-11704.
36. (a) Shaik, S; Shurki, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 586-625.
37. (b) Harcourt, R. D. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 4293-4297.
38. It should be noted that the exponential correlations for amines and nitriles, proton bonded dimers afforded A × B = 0.14 and 0.30, respectively. The other correlations ranged A × B between 0.39 and 0.54. See ref 5b for comments on the subject.
39. Cunningham, A. J.; Payzant, J. D.; Kebarle, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 7627-7632.
40. Yamdagni, R.; Kebarle, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 3504-3510.
41. -
42. (a) 44.1 kcal/mol: Wenthold, P. G.; Squires, R. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 2002-2005
43. (b) 39 kcal/mol: Gronert, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10258-10266.
44. For a recent computational study see (c) Kawara, S; Uchimaru, T.; Taira, K. Chem. Phys. 2001, 273, 207-216.