Robust LMI-based linear anti-windup design: Optimizing the unconstrained response recovery

Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control

Volumn 1, Issue , 2002, Pages 293-298

  Grimm, Gene ^a   Teel, Andrew R ^a   Zaccarian, Luca ^b  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; DYNAMICS; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEM THEORY; THEOREM PROVING;

LINEAR ANTI-WINDUP DESIGN; LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITY;

ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

EID: 0036990640     PISSN: 01912216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. K.J. Aström and L. Rundqwist, Integrator windup and how to avoid it. In ACC, vol. 2, pp. 1693-8, Pittburgh (PA), June 1989.
2. X. Chen and J.T. Wen. Robustness analysis of LTI systems with structured incrementally sector bounded nonlinearities. In ACC, pp. 3883-7, Seattle (WA), June 1995.
3. 2 performance. In CDC, pp. 1063-8, Sidney, 2000.
4. J.C. Doyle, R.S. Smith, and D.F. Enns, Control of plants with input saturation nonlinearities. In ACC, pp. 1034-9, 1987.
5. C. Edwards and I. Postletwaite, An anti-windup scheme with closed-loop stability considerations. Automat., 35(4):761-765, 1999.
6. E.G. Gilbert, I. Kolmanovsky, and K. T. Tan. Discrete-time reference governors and the nonlinear control of systems with state and control constraints. I. J. Robust N. C., 5(5):487-504, 1995.
7. G. Grimm, I. Postlethwaite, A.R. Teel, M. C. Turner, and L. Zaccarian. Linear matrix inequalities for full and reduced order anti-windup synthesis. In ACC, Arlington (VA), 2001.
8. R. Hanus. Antiwindup and bumpless transfer: a survey. In Proc. 12th IMACS World Congress, vol. 2, pp. 59-65, Paris, 1988.
9. H.K. Khalil, Nonlinear Systems, P. Hall, USA, 2nd ed., 1996.
10. M.V. Kothare, P.J. Campo, M. Morari, and N. Nett, A unified framework for the study of anti-windup designs. Automatica, 30 (12): 1869-83, 1994.
11. L.C. Kramer and K.W. Jenkins, A new technique for preventing direct digital control windup. In Joint Automatic Control Conference, pages 571-577, St. Louis (MO), August 1971.
12. V.V. Kulkarni and M.G. Safonov. Incremental positivity non-preservation by stability multipliers. In CDC, pages 33-8, 2001.
13. J.C. Lozier. A steady-state approach to the theory of saturable servo systems. IRE Trans. Automatic Control, pp. 19-39, May 1956.
14. A. Miyamoto and G. Vinnicombe. Robust control of plants with saturation nonlinearity based on coprime factor representation. In CDC, pages 2838-40, Kobe, Japan, December 1996.
15. M. Morari and E. Zafiriou. Robust process control. P. Hall, 1989.
16. E.F. Mulder, M.V. Kothare, and M. Morari. Multivariable anti-windup controller synthesis using linear matrix inequalities. Automatica, 37(9):1407-1416, September 2001.
17. J.S. Shamma. Anti-windup via constrained regulation with observers. Sys. and Control Letters, 40:1869-1883, 2000.
18. 2 anti-windup problem: Its definition and solution. In ECC, Brussels, Belgium, July 1997.
19. A. Zheng, M. V. Kothare, and M. Morari, Anti-windup design for internal model control. Int. J. of Cont., 60(5):1015-1024, 1994.