Promoting motivational goals through alternative or traditional assessment

Studies in Educational Evaluation

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 199-222

  Maslovaty, Nava ^a   Kuzi, Esther ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036983188     PISSN: 0191491X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-491X(02)80002-5     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84 (3), 261-271.
2. Anderman, E.M., & Maehr, M.L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64 (2), 287-309.
3. Anderman, E.M., & Midgley, C. (1996). Changes in achievement goal orientation after transition to middle school. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence. Boston, MA, March 7-10.
4. Anderman, L.H., & Midgley, C. (1998). Motivation and middle school students. (ERIC Database No. ED 421281).
5. Birenbaum, M., & Dochy, F. (Eds.) (1996). Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
6. Brooks, J.G., & Brooks, M.G. (1992). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
7. Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Falk, B. (1995). Authentic assessment in action. New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
9. Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (vol. 3, pp. 1017-1096). New York: Wiley.
10. Gipps, C. (1999). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. In A. Iran-Nejad & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of Research in Education, 24 (pp. 355-392). Washington: American Educational Research Association.
11. Graham, S. (1990). Communicating low ability in the classroom: Bad things good teachers sometimes do. In S. Graham & V. Folkes (Eds.), Attribution theory: Applications to achievement, mental health, and interpersonal conflict (pp. 17-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Guttman, L. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 33, 469-506.
13. Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., & Schmidt, M. (2002). Perspectives on alternative assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal, 39 (1), 69-95.
14. Harter, S. (1981). A new field-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology, 17, 300-312.
15. Hawley, W.D., & Valli, L., (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Dykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning professions (pp. 127-150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Hickey, D.T., & McCaslin, M. (2001). A comparative, sociocultural analysis of context and motivation. In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts (pp. 33-56). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
17. Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J.M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: Critical issues for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70 (2), 151-179.
18. Hoffmann, L., & Haussler, P. (1998). An intervention project promoting girls' and boys' interest in physics. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon conference on interest and gender (pp. 301-316). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
19. Järvelä, S. (2001). Shifting research on motivation and cognition to an integrated approach on learning and motivation in context. In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts (pp. 3-14), Amsterdam: Pergamon.
20. Joreskog, K.G., & Sorbom, D. (1981). LISREL analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Upsalla: University of Upsalla, Department of Statistics.
21. Levy, S. (Ed.) (1994). Louis Guttman on theory and methodology: Selected writings. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
22. Lewy, A. (Ed.) (1996). Alternative assessment: Theory and practice. Tel Aviv: Mofet (Hebrew).
23. Lingoes, J. C. (1973). The Guttman-Lingoes Nonmetric Program Series. Ann Arbor, MI: Mathesis Press.
24. Linnenbrink, E.A., & Pintrich, P.R. (2001). Multiple goals, multiple contexts: The dynamic interplay between personal goals and contextual goal stresses. In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts (pp. 251-270). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
25. Maehr, M.L., & Midgley, C. (1991). Enhancing student motivation: A schoolwide approach. Educational Psychologist, 26, 399-427.
26. Maehr, M.L., & Midgley, C. (1996). Transforming school cultures. Lives in context series. Boulder, CO: Westview.
27. Maslovaty, N. (1992). Selected areas of the value structure of adolescents. In H. Klages, J.H. Hippler, & W. Herbert (Eds.), Werte und Vandel: Ergebnisse und Methoden einer Froschungs tradition (pp. 523-552). Frankfurt: Campus.
28. Maslovaty, N., Marshall, A.E., & Alkin, M.C. (2001). Teachers' perceptions structured through facet theory: Smallest space analysis versus factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61 (1), 71-84.
29. Midgley, C., & Kaplan, A. (1997). The effect of achievement goals: Does level of perceived academic competence make a difference? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 415-435.
30. Midgley, C., Maehr, M.L., & Urdan, T.C. (1993). A manual: Patterns of adaptive learning survey. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
31. Oakes, J., & Lipton, M. (1999). Teaching to change the world. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
32. Paris, S.G., & Turner, J.C. (1994). Situated motivation. In P.R. Pintrich, D.R., Brown, & C.E. Weinstein (Eds.), Student motivation: Cognition and learning (pp. 213-237). New Jersey: Erlbaum.
33. Pressick-Kilborn, K., & Walker, R. (2001) Co-creating interest in learning: An ethnographic study. Paper presented at the 9th Conference of the European Association for Learning and Instruction. Fribourg, Switzerland.
34. Putterman, E. (1999). The contribution of the alternative assessment method by performance tasks for developing learning motivation, and for advancing scholastic achievement. Unpublished master's thesis, School of Education, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan (Hebrew).
35. Richardson, V. (Ed.) (1997). Constructivist teacher education. London: Falmer.
36. Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38 (2), 437-460.
37. Ryan, A.M., Hicks, L., & Midgley, C. (1997). Social goals, academic goals, and avoiding seeking help in the classroom. Journal of Early Adolescence, 17 (2), 152-171.
38. Shepard, L.A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher. 29 (7), 4-14.
39. Suchman, E.A. (1967). Evaluative research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
40. Townsend, M.A.R., & Hicks, L. (1995). Classroom goal structures, social satisfaction and the perceived value of academic tasks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April 18-22.
41. Turner, J.C. (2001). Using context to enrich and challenge our understanding of motivational theory. In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts (pp. 85-104). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
42. Vadeboncoeur, J. A. (1997). Child development and the purpose of education: A historical context for constructivism in teacher education. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education: Building new understandings (pp. 15-37). London: Falmer.
43. Vauras, M., Salonem, P., Lehtinen, E., & Lepolo, J. (2001). Long-term development of motivation and cognition in family and school contexts. In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts (pp. 295-315). Amsterdam: Pergamon.