Enhancing the expressiveness of structured reporting systems

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 13, Issue 2 SUPPL. 1, 2000, Pages 49-53

  Langlotz, Curtis P ^a,b  

^a eDict Systems Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; RADIOLOGY; RELATIONAL DATABASE SYSTEMS; TEXT PROCESSING;

STRUCTURED REPORTING SYSTEMS;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DOCUMENTATION; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICAL RECORD;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 0033625277     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf03167624     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Holman B, Aliabadi P, Silverman S, et al: Medical impact of unedited preliminary radiology reports. Radiology 191:519-521, 1994
2. Seltzer S, Kelly P, Adams D, et al: Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports: Use of total quality management to facilitate radiologists' report signing. AJR 162:775-781, 1994
3. Sobel J, Pearson M, Gross K, et al: Information content and clarity of radiologists' reports for chest radiography. Acad Radiol 3:709-717, 1996
4. Friedman C, Cimino J, and Johnson S: A schema for representing medical language applied to clinical radiology. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1:233-248, 1994
5. Pendergrass H, Greenes R, Barnett G, et al: An on-line computer facility for systematized input of radiology reports. Radiology 92:709-713, 1969
6. Greenes R, Barnett G, Klein S, et al: Recording, retrieval, and review of medical data by physician computer interaction. N Engl J Med 282:307-315, 1970
7. Clayton P, Ostler D, Gennaro J, et al: A radiology reporting system based on most likely diagnoses. Comp Biomed Res 13:258-270, 1980
8. Bell D, Greenes R: Evaluation of UltraSTAR: Performance of a collaborative structured data entry system. JAMIA Symposium Supplement, 1994, pp 216-222
9. Moorman P, van Ginneken A, Siersema P, et al: Evaluation of reporting based on descriptional knowledge. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 2:365-373, 1995
10. Kahn C, Wang K, Bell D: Structured entry of radiology reports using world-wide web technology. Radiographics 16:683-691, 1996
11. Bell D, Greenes R, Doubilet P: Form-based clinical input from a structured vocabulary: Initial application in ultrasound reporting. JAMIA Symposium Supplement, 1992, pp 789-791
12. MacGregor J, Lee E, Lam N: Optimizing the structure of database menu indexes: A decision model of menu search. Hum Factors 28:387-399, 1986
13. Parkinson S, Sisson N, Snowberry K: Organization of broad computer menu displays. Int J Man Machine Studies 23:689-697, 1985
14. Poon A, Fagan L, Shortliffe E: The Pen-Ivory project: Exploring user interface design for the selection of items from large controlled vocabularies of medicine. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 3:168-183, 1996
15. Bidgood D, DICOM Working Group 8: Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Supplement 23: Structured Reporting. Northfield, IL, College of American Pathologists, 1997
16. Cimino J, Clayton P, Hripcsak G, et al: Knowledge-based approaches to the maintenance of a large controlled medical terminology. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1:35-50, 1994
17. Scott A, Clancey W, Davis R, et al: Methods for generating explanations, in Buchanan B, Shortliffe E (eds):Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1984, pp 338-362