The PEN-Ivory Project: Exploring User-interface Design for the Selection of Items from Large Controlled Vocabularies of Medicine

Emerging Infectious Diseases

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 168-183

  Poon, Alex D ^a,b   Fagan, Lawrence M ^a   Shortliffe, Edward H ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL RECORD;

MEDICAL RECORDS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 57349200714     PISSN: 10806040     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1996.96236285     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Dick R, Steen E, eds. The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, 1991:190.
2. Shortliffe E, Barnett G. Medical data: their acquisition, storage, and use. In: Shortliffe E, Perreault L, eds. Medical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1990:37-69.
3. Greenes R, Barnett G, Klein S, Robbins A, Prior R. Recording, retrieval, and review of medical data by physician-computer interaction. N Engl J Med 1970;282:307-15.
4. Pendergrass H, Greenes R, Barnett G, Poitras J, Pappalardo A, Marble C. An online computer facility for systematized input of radiology reports. Radiology. 1969;92:709-13.
5. O'Dell D. Increasing physician acceptance and use of the computerized ambulatory medical record. Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Washington, DC: McGraw Hill, 1991:848-52.
6. Hammond W, Stead W. Adapting TMR for physician/nurse use. Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Washington, DC: McGraw Hill, 1991:833-7.
7. Gelman M. The right system for the write reason. Proceedings of the AMIA Spring Congress. San Francisco, CA: American Medical Informatics Association, 1994:83.
8. Urkin J. A computerized medical record with direct data entry for community clinics in Israel. Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Washington, DC: McGraw Hill, 1991:838-42.
9. Luff P, Heath C, Greatbatch D. Tasks-in-interaction: paper and screen based documentation in collaborative activity. Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1992:163-70.
10. Essin D, Lincoln T. Design criteria for event-driven pen-based user interfaces. Proceedings of the AMIA Spring Congress. San Francisco, CA: American Medical Informatics-Association, 1994:100.
11. Lussier Y, Maksud M, Desruisseaux B, Yale P, St-Arneault R. A computerized patient record software for direct data entry by physicians using a keyboard-free pen-based portable computer. Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Baltimore, MD: McGraw Hill, 1992:261-4.
12. Rich C. Pen computer clinical encounter recorder. Proceedings of the AMIA Spring Congress. San Francisco, CA: American Medical Informatics Association, 1994:62.
13. Swearingen R, Brown T. Requirements and benefits of a successful pen-based data entry system. Proceedings of the AMIA Spring Conference. San Francisco, CA: American Medical Informatics Association, 1994:101.
14. Campbell K, Wieckert K, Fagan L, Musen M. A computer-based tool for generation of progress notes. Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Washington, DC: McGraw-Hill, 1993:284-8.
15. Weed L. Medical Records, Medical Education, and Patient Care. Cleveland, OH: The Press of Case Western Reserve University, 1969.
16. Card SK. User perceptual mechanisms in the search of computer command menus. Proceedings of Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 1982:190-6.
17. Teitelbaum RC, Granada RE. The effects of positional constancy on searching menus for information. Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 1983:150-3.
18. Somberg BL. A comparison of rule-based positionally constant arrangements of computer menu items. Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems and Graphics Interface. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 1987:255-60.
19. Mitchell J, Shneiderman B. Dynamic versus static menus: an exploratory comparison. SIGCHI Bulletin 1989;20(4):33-7.
20. Nygren E. Reading documents in intensive care. I: Pattern recognition and encoding of characteristics of the information media. Center for human computer studies (CMD), Tech report number 21/91, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden, 1991.
21. Norman KL. The Psychology of Menu Selection. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Company, 1991.
22. Lee E, MacGregor J. Minimizing user search time in menu retrieval systems. Human Factors. 1985;27:157-62.
23. Kiger JI. The depth/breadth trade-off in the design of menu-driven user interfaces. Int J Man-Machine Stud. 1984;20:210-3.
24. Landauer TK, Nachbar DW. Selection from alphabetic and numeric menu trees using a touch screen: breadth, depth, and width. Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 1985:73-8.
25. Papp KR, Roske-Hofstrand RJ. The optimal number of menu options per panel. Human Factors. 1986;28:377-85.
26. McDonald JE, Stone JD, Liebolt LS. Searching for items in menus: the effect of organization and type of target. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society - 27th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society. 1983:834-7.
27. Parkinson SR, Sisson N, Snowberry K. Organization of broad computer menu displays. Int J Man-Machine Stud. 1985;23:689-97.
28. MacGregor J, Lee E, Lam N. Optimizing the structure of database menu indexes: a decision model of menu search. Human Factors. 1986;28:387-99.
29. Bell D, Greenes R. Evaluation of UltraSTAR: performance of a collaborative structured data entry system. Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 1994;1:216-22.
30. Ginneken A, van der Lei J, Moorman P. Toward unambiguous representation of patient data. Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Baltimore, MD: McGraw-Hill, 1992:69-73.
31. Gouveia-Oliveira A, Raposo V, Salgado N, Almeida I, Nobre-Leitao C, Galvao de Melo F. Longitudinal comparative study on the influence of computers on reporting of clinical data. Endoscopy. 1991;23:334-7.
32. Huff S, Pryor A, Tebbs R. Pick from thousands: a collaborative processing model for coded data entry. Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Baltimore, MD: McGraw-Hill, 1992:104-8.
33. Kuhn K, Gaus W, Wechsler J, et al. Structured reporting of medical findings: evaluation of a system in gastroenterology. Meth Inform Med. 1992;1:268-74.
34. Naeymi-Rad F, Almeida F, Trace D. IMR-Entry (Intelligent Medical Record Entry). Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Baltimore, MD: McGraw-Hill, 1992:783-4.
35. Nowlan W, Rector A, Kay S, et al. PEN&PAD: a doctor's workstation with intelligent data entry and summaries. Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Bethesda, Maryland, American Medical Informatics Association, 1989:941-42.
36. Poon AD, Fagan LM. PEN-Ivory: The design and evaluation of a pen-based computer system for structured data entry. Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 1994;1:447-51.
37. Wheeler P, Simborg D, Gitlin J. The Johns Hopkins radiology reporting system. Radiology. 1976;119:315-9.
38. Shiffman S, Detmer W, Lane C, Fagan L. A continuous-speech interface to a decision support system: I. Techniques to accommodate for misrecognized input. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 1995;2:36-45.
39. Miller RA, Pople HE, Myers JD. INTERNIST-1: an experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:468-76.
40. Miller RA, McNeil MA, Challinor SM, Maserie FW, Myers JD. The Internist/Quick Medical Reference project status report. West J Med. 1986;145:816-22.
41. Siegel E, Cummings M, Woodsmall R. Bibliographic-retrieval systems. In: Shortliffe E, Perreault L, eds. Medical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1990:434-65.
42. Card S, Moran T, Newell A. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983.
43. Nielsen J. Usability Engineering. Cambridge, MA: AP Professional, 1993.
44. Meister D. System effectiveness testing. In: Salvendy G, ed. Handbook of Human Factors. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987:1271-97.