Identification of contact dynamics model parameters from constrained robotic operations

ASME 2002 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE2002

Volumn 5, Issue , 2002, Pages 1289-1298

  Weber, M ^a   Ma, O ^b   Sharf, I ^c  

^a IKS GmbH   (Germany)

^b Macdonald Dettwiler Space and Advanced Robotics Limited   (Germany)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY; CONTACT DYNAMICS; CONTACT DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; CONTACT GEOMETRY; CONTACT TASK; IDENTIFICATION ALGORITHMS; IDENTIFICATION PROBLEM; MODEL PARAMETERS; MULTIPLE SURFACES; NOVEL STRATEGIES; NUMERICAL TECHNIQUES; OPERATION SUPPORT; OVERDETERMINED SYSTEMS; POSITION INFORMATION; REAL-SPACE; SENSOR DATA; SPACE SYSTEM; TIME VARIANT;

DESIGN; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL METHODS; ROBOTICS; ROBOTS; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS; END EFFECTORS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DYNAMICS;

EID: 0036974735     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Han, I., and Gilmore, B.J., 1993, "Multi-Body Impact Motion with Friction Analysis, Simulation and Experimental Validation," Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 115, pp. 412-422.
2. Hurmuzlu, Y., and Marghitu, D.B., 1994, "Rigid Body Collision of Planar Kinematic Chains with Multiple Contact Points," International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 82-92.
3. Ma, O., Buhariwala, K., Roger, N., MacLean, J., and Carr, R., 1997, "MDSF A Generic Development and Simulation Facility for Flexible, Complex Robotic Systems," Robotica, Vol. 15, pp. 49-62.
4. Vukobratovic, M.K., and Potkonjak, V., 1999, "Dynamics of Contact Tasks in Robotics. Part I: General Model of Robot Interacting with Environment," Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 34, pp. 923-942.
5. Gilardi, G., and Sharf, I, "Literature Survey of Contact Dynamics Modelling," to appear in the Journal of Mechanism and Machine Theory.
6. Van Vliet, J., Sharf, I., and Ma, O., 2000, "Experimental Validation of Contact Dynamics Simulation of Constrained Robotic Tasks," International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 19, No. 12, pp. 1203-1217.
7. Seraji, H., and Colbaugh, R., 1997, "Force tracking in impedance control," International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 97-117.
8. Love, L. and Book, W, 1995, "Environment estimation for enhanced impedance control," Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1854-1859.
9. Erickson, D.A., 2000, Contact Stiffness and Damping Estimation for Constrained Robotic Systems. Master's thesis, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.
10. Sharf, I., G. Gilardi and C. Crawford, "Identification of Friction Coefficient for Constrained Robotic Tasks," to appear in the ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 2002.
11. Sharf, I, and Nahon, M, 1995, "Interference Distance Calculation For Two Objects Bounded By Quadratic Surfaces," Design Engineering Technical Conference, ASME.
12. Ma, O., 1999, "Contact Dynamics Toolkit (CDT) User's Guide," Version CDT-98, Release 4, Document MDSAR TN.R&D-1999.93, Macdonald Dettwiler Space and Advanced Robotics Ltd., Ontario, Canada.
13. Weber, M., 2001, Contact Parameter Identification for Constrained Robotic Tasks with Known Geometry. Master's thesis, University of Applied Sciences FH Ravensburg- Weingarten.