The lateralized Stroop: A meta-analysis and its implications for models of semantic processing

Brain and Language

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 384-402

  Belanger, Heather G ^a   Cimino, Cynthia R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COLOR; EXPERIMENTATION; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LEFT HEMISPHERE; META ANALYSIS; MODEL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORY; VERBALIZATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

BRAIN; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0036930020     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00508-4     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Ahola, K., Vilkki, J., & Servo, A. (1996). Frontal tests do not detect frontal infarctions after ruptured intracranial aneurysm. Brain and Cognition, 31, 1-16.
2. Alivisatos, B., & Wilding, J. M. (1982). Hemispheric differences in matching Stroop-type letter stimuli. Cortex, 18, 5-21.
3. Allison, T., Madsen, D., & Zaidel, E. (1999). Effects of cigarette smoking on hemispheric dominance and callosal transmission using the lateralized Stroop color-word interference task. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 5(2), 136.
4. Babkoff, H., Gesner, S., & Hegge, F. (1985). Lexical decision, parafoveal eccentricity, and visual hemifield. Cortex, 21, 581-593.
5. Banich, M. T., Milham, M. P., Atchley, R. A., Cohen, N. J., Webb, A., Wszalek, T., Kramer, A. F., Liang, Z., Barad, V., Gullett, D., Shah, C., & Brown, C. (2000). Prefrontal regions play a predominant role in imposing an attentional 'set': Evidence from fMRI. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 1-9.
6. Bathurst, K., & Kee, D. (1994). Finger-tapping interference as produced by concurrent verbal and nonverbal tasks: An analysis of individual differences in left-handers. Brain and Cognition, 24, 123-136.
7. Beeman, M., & Chiarello, C. (Eds.). (1998). Right Hemisphere Language Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Beeman, M., Friedman, R. B., Grafman, J., Perez, E., Diamond, S., & Lindsay, M. B. (1994). Summation priming and coarse semantic coding in the right hemisphere. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 26-45.
9. Bergen, A. E., & Mosley, J. L. (1994). Attention and attentional shift eNciency in individuals with and without mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 98, 732-743.
10. Besner, D., & Stolz, J. A. (1999). What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 99-104.
11. Bihrle, A. M., Brownell, H. H., & Powelson, J. A. (1986). Comprehension of humorous and non-humorous materials by left and right brain-damaged patients. Brain and Cognition, 5, 399-411.
12. Blenner, J. L. (1993). The discriminant capacity of the Stroop test in tumor neurosurgical patients and its relationship to the visual evoked potential measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 99-102.
13. Boles, D. B. (1984). Sex in lateralized tachistoscopic word recognition. Brain and Language, 23, 307-317.
14. Boles, D. B. (1994). An experimental comparison of stimulus type, display type, and input variable contributions to visual field asymmetry. Brain and Cognition, 24, 184-197.
15. Bradshaw, J. L. (1989). Hemispheric Specialization and Psychological Function. New York: Wiley.
16. Brown, T. L., Gore, C. L., & Pearson, T. (1998). Visual half-field Stroop effects with spatial separation of words and color targets. Brain and Language, 63, 122-142.
17. Brown, G. G., Kindermann, S. S., Siegle, G. J., Granholm, E., Wong, E. C., & Buxton, R. B. (1999). Brain activation and pupil response during covert performance of the Stroop Color Word task. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 5, 308-319.
18. Brown, W. S., Thrasher, E. D., & Paul, L. K. (2001). Interhemispheric Stroop effects in partial and complete agenesis of the corpus callosum. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 302-311.
19. Brownell, H. H. (1988). Appreciation of metaphoric and connotative word meaning by brain-damaged patients. In C. Chiarello (Ed.), Right Hemisphere Contributions to Lexical Semantics (pp. 19-31). New York: Springer.
20. Burgess, C., & Simpson, G. B. (1988). Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meanings. Brain and Language, 33, 86-103.
21. Chiarello, C. (1985). Hemisphere dynamics in lexical access: Automatic and controlled priming. Brain and Language, 26, 146-172.
22. Chiarello, C., Burgess, C., Richards, L., & Pollock, A. (1990). Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres: Some words do, some words don't. . .sometimes, some places. Brain and Language, 38, 75-104.
23. Chiarello, C., Richards, L., & Pollock, A. (1992). Semantic additivity and semantic inhibition: Dissociable processes in the cerebral hemispheres? Brain and Language, 42, 52-76.
24. Chiarello, C., Senehi, J., & Nuding, S. (1987). Semantic priming with abstract and concrete words: Differential asymmetry may be postlexical. Brain and Language, 31, 43-60.
25. Chiarello, C., Senehi, J., & Soulier, M. (1986). Viewing conditions and hemisphere asymmetry for the lexical decision. Neuropsychologia, 24, 521-529.
26. Christman, S. (1989). Perceptual characteristics in visual laterality research. Brain and Cognition, 11, 238-257.
27. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
28. Cohen, G., & Martin, M. A. (1975). Hemisphere differences in an auditory Stroop test. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 79-83.
29. Cohen, J. D., Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (1998). A PDP approach to set size effects within the Stroop task: Reply to Kanne, Balota, Spieler, and Faust (1998). Psychological Review, 105, 188-194.
30. David, A. S. (1992). Stroop effects within and between the cerebral hemispheres: Studies in normals and acallosals. Neuropsychologia, 30, 161-175.
31. David, A. S. (1993). Callosal transfer in schizophrenia: Too much or too little? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 573-579.
32. Davis, W., Jorgenson, C. B., Kristelis, A., & Opella, J. (1981). Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of Stroop stimuli: The effect of enhancement of spatial skills. International Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 179-183.
33. Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170-177.
34. Durgin, F. H. (2000). The reverse Stroop effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 121-125.
35. Dyer, F. N. (1973a). The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes. Memory and Cognition, 1, 106-120.
36. Dyer, F. N. (1973b). Interference and facilitation for color naming with separate bilateral presentations of the word and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 314-317.
37. Eglin, M., & Hunter, A. (1990). Cueing efficiency in a Stroop-like task with visual half-field presentation. Memory and Cognition, 18, 459-468.
38. Faust, M. E., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1996). Cerebral mechanisms for suppression of inappropriate information during sentence comprehension. Brain and Language, 53, 234-259.
39. Franzon, M., & Hugdahl, K. (1986). Visual half-field presentations of incongruent color words: Effects of gender and handedness. Cortex, 22, 433-445.
40. Franzon, M., & Hugdahl, K. (1987). Effects of speed vs. accuracy in vocal reaction time to visual half-field presentations of incongruent Stroop color-words. Cortex, 23, 615-629.
41. Glaser, M. O., & Glaser, W. R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 875-894.
42. Glass, G., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. C. (1981). Meta-analysis in Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
43. Golden, C. J. (1976). Identification of brain disorders by the Stroop color and word test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 654-658.
44. Goolkasian, P. (1981). Retinal location and its effect on the processing of target and distractor information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1247-1257.
45. Guiard, Y. (1981). Effect of processing mode on the degree of motor asymmetry in the manual Stroop test. Cortex, 17, 427-434.
46. Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107-128.
47. Hedges, L. V. (1982). Fitting categorical models to effect sizes from a series of experiments. Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 119-137.
48. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
49. Hock, H. S., & Egeth, H. (1970). Verbal interference with encoding in a perceptual classification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 299-303.
50. Hugdahl, K., & Franzon, M. (1985). Visual half-field presentations of incongruent color-words reveal mirror-reversal of language lateralization in dextral and sinistral subjects. Cortex, 21, 359-374.
51. Kahneman, D., & Chajczyk, D. (1983). Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 497-509.
52. Kanne, S. M., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., & Faust, M. E. (1998). Explorations of Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland's (1990) connectionist model of Stroop performance. Psychological Review, 105, 174-187.
53. Kavcic, V., & Clarke, J. M. (2000). Hemispheric interactions during a face-word Stroop-analog task. Neuropsychology, 14, 579-587.
54. Kingma, A., Heij, W. L., Fasotti, L., & Eling, P. (1996). Stroop interference and disorders of selective attention. Neuropsychologia, 34, 273-281.
55. Logan, G. D. (1978). Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 107, 32-63.
56. Long, G. M., & Lyman, B. J. (1987). Foveal and parafoveal processing of asynchronous Stroop stimuli. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 151-162.
57. Lupker, S. J., & Sanders, M. (1982). Visual-field differences in picture-word interference. Brain and Cognition, 1, 381-398.
58. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
59. McGlone, J. (1977). Sex differences in the cerebral organization of verbal functions in patients with unilateral brain lesions. Brain, 100, 775-793.
60. Milberg, W., & Blumstein, S. E. (1981). Lexical decision and aphasia: Evidence for semantic processing. Brain and Language, 14, 371-385.
61. Morgan, A. L. R., & Brandt, J. F. (1989). An auditory Stroop effect for pitch, loudness, and time. Brain and Language, 36, 592-603.
62. Nehemkis, A. M., & Lewinsohn, P. M. (1972). Effects of left and right cerebral lesions on the naming process. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 35, 787-798.
63. Newman, J. P. (1990). Effects of characterological anxiety and situational arousal on the solving of a color-word interference task: Hemispheric processing implications. International Journal of Neuroscience, 52, 1-9.
64. O'Leary, M. J., & Barber, P. J. (1993). Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 830-844.
65. Perret, E. (1974). The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual respones in verbal categorical behaviour. Neuropsychologia, 12, 323-330.
66. Phillips, M. L., Woodruff, P. W. R., & David, A. S. (1996). Stroop interference and facilitation in the cerebral hemispheres in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 20, 57-68.
67. Pieters, J. M. (1981). Ear asymmetry in an auditory spatial Stroop task as a function of handedness. Cortex, 17, 369-380.
68. Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdales, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Richards, L., & Chiarello, C. (1995). Depth of associated activation in the cerebral hemispheres: Mediated versus direct priming. Neuropsychologia, 33, 171-179.
70. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic Procedures for Social Research (Rev Ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
71. Santee, J., & Egeth, H. (1982). Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 8, 489-501.
72. Schmit, V., & Davis, R. (1974). The role of hemispheric specialization in the analysis of Stroop stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 38, 149-158.
73. Seymour, P. K. (1973). A model for reading, naming and comparison. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 35-49.
74. Seymour, P. K. (1977). Conceptual encoding and locus of the Stroop effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 245-265.
75. Simon, J. R., Paullin, C., Overmyer, S. P., & Berbaum, K. (1985). Reaction time to word meaning and ink color of laterally-presented Stroop stimuli: Effects of handedness and sex. International Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 21-33.
76. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
77. Tsao, Y., Feustel, T., & Soseos, C. (1979). Stroop interference in the left and right visual fields. Brain and Language, 8, 367-371.
78. Udalova, G. P. (1996). Recognition of word-picture visual stimuli with and without hindrance. Human Physiology, 22, 24-29.
79. Underwood, G. (1977). Attention, awareness, and hemispheric differences in word recognition. Neuropsychologia, 15, 717-727.
80. Vaid, J., & Corina, D. (1989). Visual field asymmetries in numerical size comparisons for digits, words and signs. Brain and Language, 36, 117-126.
81. Vaid, J., & Lambert, W. E. (1979). Differential cerebral involvement in the cognitive functioning of bilinguals. Brain and Language, 8, 92-110.
82. Strien, J. W., & Bouma, A. (1988). Cerebral organization of verbal and motor functions in left-handed and right-handed adults: Effects of concurrent verbal tasks on unimanual tapping performance. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 139-156.
83. Vendrell, P., Junque, C., Pujol, J., Jurado, M. A., Molet, J., & Grafman, J. (1995). The role of prefrontal regions in the Stroop task. Neuropsychologia, 33, 341-352.
84. Warren, L. R., & Marsh, G. R. (1978). Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of Stroop stimuli. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 214-216.
85. Warren, L. R., & Marsh, G. R. (1979). Changes in event related potentials during processing of Stroop stimuli. International Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 217-223.
86. Weekes, N. Y., Inman, C. J., Hoffman, C., & Zaidel, E. (1999). The effects of stress on laterality. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 5(2), 105.
87. Weekes, N. Y., & Zaidel, E. (1996). The effects of procedural variations on lateralized Stroop effects. Brain and Cognition, 31, 308-330.
88. Winner, E., & Gardner, H. (1977). The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients. Brain, 100, 719-727.
89. Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
90. Wuillemin, D. B., Krane, R. V., & Richardson, B. L. (1982). Hemispheric differences in picture-word interference. Brain and Language, 16, 121-132.
91. Young, A. W. (1982). Methodological and theoretical bases of visual hemifield studies. In J. G. Beaumont (Ed.), Divided Visual Field Studies of Cerebral Organization (pp. 11-27). New York: Academic Press.
92. Zaidel, E. (1978). Lexical organization in the right hemisphere. In P. Buser & A. Rougeut-Buser (Eds.), Cerebral Correlates of Conscious Experience (pp. 177-197). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
93. Zaidel, E. (1982). Reading by the disconnected right hemisphere: An aphasiological perspective. In Y. Zotterman (Ed.), Wenner Gren Symposium Series, Dyslexia: Neurological, Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects (pp. 67-91). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
94. Zhang, H., & Kornblum, S. (1998). The effects of stimulus-response mapping and irrelevant stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus overlap in four-choice Stroop tasks with single-carrier stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 3-19.