Nonprofit organizations as contracted local social service providers in eastern Europe and the commonwealth of independent states

Public Administration and Development

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 429-437

  Struyk, Raymond J ^a  

^a URBAN INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOCAL GOVERNMENT; NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION; SERVICE PROVISION; WELFARE PROVISION;

EUROPE;

EID: 0036926297     PISSN: 02712075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pad.243     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aedo C, Larranaga O (eds). 1994. Social Service Delivery Systems: An Agenda for Reform. Interamerican Development Bank: Washington, DC.
2. Alam Q, Pacher J. 2000. Impact of compulsory competitive tendering on the structure and performance of local government systems in the state of Victoria. Public Administration and Development 20: 359-371.
3. Angelici K, Struyk R, Tikhomirova M. 1995. Private maintenance for Moscow's municipal housing stock: does it work? Journal of Housing Economics 4: 50-70.
4. Anheier HK, Seibel W. 1998. The nonprofit sector and the transformation of societies: comparative analysis of east Germany, Poland, and Hungary. In Private Action and the Public Good, Powell WW, Clemens ES (eds). Yale University Press: New Haven.
5. Baar K. 1998. Contracting Out Municipal Public Services: Transparency, Procurement, and Price Setting Issues-The Case of Hungary. Urban Institute, Processed: Washington, DC.
6. Bately R. 2000. An Overview of Findings: The Role of Government in Adjusting Economies. www.bham.ac.uk/IDD/rog41.htm
7. Bird RM, Ebel RD, Wallich CI. 1995. Decentralization of the Socialist State. World Bank, Regional and Sectoral Study: Washington, DC.
8. Boris E, Steuerle CE (eds). 1999. Nonprofits and Government: Collaboration and Conflict. Urban Institute Press: Washington, DC.
9. Brinkerhoff DW. 2002. Government-nonprofit partners for health sector reform in central Asia: family group practice associations in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Public Administration and Development 22: 51-61.
10. Brinkerhoff JM. 2002. Government-nonprofit partnership: a defining framework. Public Administration and Development 22: 19-30.
11. Brinkerhoff JM, Brinkerhoff DW. 2002. Government-nonprofit relations in comparative perspective: evolution, themes and new directions. Public Administration and Development 22: 3-18.
12. Cohen JM, Peterson SB. 1999. Administrative Decentralization: Strategies for Developing Countries. Kumarian Press: West Hartford.
13. Csoka I. 2000. The relationship between the governmental and civil sectors in Hungary. International Journal of Not for Profit Law 3(1) (from web site www.icnl.org/journal).
14. Davis L. 1998. The NPO-business hybrid: is the private sector the answer? Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies on Social Change and Development, Johns Hopkins University, processed: Washington, DC.
15. Dees JG. 1998. Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review January-February: 55-67.
16. Ebel R, Varfalvi I, Varga S. 1998. Sorting out intergovernmental roles and responsibilities. In Public Finance Reform during the Transition: The Experience of Hungary, Bokros L, Dethier J-J (eds). World Bank: Washington, DC.
17. Ferlie E, Ashburner L, Fitzgerald L, Pettigrew A. 1996. The New Public Management in Action. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
18. Freinkman L, Treisman D, Titov S. 1999. Subnational Budgeting in Russia: Preempting a Potential Crisis, Technical Paper no. 452. World Bank: Washington, DC.
19. Gallagher J, Liborakina M, Novik V, Richman B, Siveava T, Tarasov D. 2000. Local Social Assistance in Russia: A Case Study of Four Cities. Urban Institute Report to USAID/Moscow, processed: Washington, DC.
20. Hilderbrand M, Grindle MS. 1997. Building sustainable capacity in the public sector. In Getting Good Government: Capacity Building in the Public Sectors of Developing Countries, Grindle MS (ed.). Harvard Institute for International Development: Cambridge: 31-62.
21. Horvath TM. 2000. Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. LGI Press: Budapest.
22. Hyatt J, Cooper L, Knight B. 1998. From Transition to Development: The Non-Profit Sectors of Central and Eastern Europe. Charities Evaluation Services: London.
23. Ingraham PW. 1997. Play it again, sam: it's still not right: searching for the right notes in administrative reform. Public Administration Review 57(4): 325-331.
24. Karatnycky A, Motyl A, Shor B (eds). 1997. Nations in Transit 1997. Transactions Publishers: New Brunswick, NJ.
25. Kendell J, Anheier H, Potucek M. 2000. Ten years after; the third sector and civil society in central and eastern Europe. Voluntas 11(2): 103-105.
26. Kirchner EJ (ed.). 1999. Decentralization and Transition in the Vizegrad. St. Martin's Press: New York.
27. Kuti E. 1999. Different eastern European countries at different crossroads. Voluntas 10(1): 61-72.
28. Liner B, Hatry H, Vinson E, Allen R, Dusenbury P, Bryant S, Snell R. 2001. Making Results-Based State Government Work. Urban Institute Press: Washington, DC.
29. Nigthingale DS, Pindus N. 1997. Privatization of Public Social Services: A Background Paper. Urban Institute, processed: Washington, DC.
30. Morales-Gomez D, Torres M. 1999. What type of social-policy reform for what kind of society. In Transitional Social Policies: The New Development Challenges of Globalization, Morales-Gomez D (ed.). Earthscan: London.
31. Nowicki ME. 2000. Kazakhstan's nonprofit sector at a crossroads on the great silk road. Voluntas 11: 217-237.
32. OECD. 1997. Contracting Out Government Services: Best Practices, Guidelines and Case Studies, Occasional Paper No. 20. OECD: Paris.
33. Osborne SP, Kaposvari A. 1998. Non-governmental organizations and the development of services: meeting social needs in local communities in post-communist Hungary. Public Administration and Development 18: 365-380.
34. Ottaway M. Carothers T (eds). 2000. Funding Virtue: Civil Society Aid and Democracy Promotion. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: Washington, DC.
35. Pigey JH, Mikelsons M, et al. 2001. Local Government Reform Project-Croatia: Review of the Legal Framework. Urban Institute Report to USAID/Croatia, processed: Washington, DC.
36. Quigley KFF. 2000. Lofty goals, modest results: assisting civil society. In Funding Virtue: Civil Society and Democracy Promotion, Ottaway M, Carothers T (eds). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: Washington, DC: 191-216.
37. Regulski J. 1999. Building Democracy in Poland: The State Reform of 1998. Open Society Institute, Discussion Paper no. 9. Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative: Budapest.
38. Salamon LM. 1987. Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Journal of Voluntary Action Research 16(1-2): 29-49.
39. Smith SR, Lipsky M. 1993. Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.
40. Struyk R. 1996. The long road to reform. In Economic Restructuring in the Former Soviet Bloc: The Case of Housing, Struyk R (ed.). Urban Institute Press: Washington, DC: 1-70.
41. Therkildsen O. 2000. Public sector reform in a poor, aid-dependent country, Tanzania. Public Administration and Development 20: 61-71.
42. Wallich C (ed.). 1994. Russia and the Challenge of Fiscal Federalism. World Bank: Washington, DC.
43. Walsh K, Davis H. 1993. Competition and Service: The Impact of the Local Government Act 1988. HMSO, Department of the Environment: London.
44. World Bank. 2000. Making Transition Work for Everyone: Poverty and Inequality in Europe and Central Asia. World Bank: Washington, DC.