Continuous Holter telemetry of atrial electrograms and marker annotations using a common Holter recording system: Impact on Holter electrocardiogram interpretation in patients with dual chamber pacemakers

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 25, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 1724-1730

  Wiegand, Uwe K H ^a   Bonnemeier, Hendrik ^a   Bode, Frank ^a   Eberhardt, Frank ^a   Chun, Julian K R ^a   Katus, Hugo A ^a   Peters, Werner ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Atrial electrogram; Dual chamber pacemakers; Holter monitoring; Marker annotations; Telemetry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HOLTER MONITORING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; P WAVE; PACEMAKER FAILURE; RELIABILITY; SINUS BRADYCARDIA; SINUS RHYTHM; TELEMETRY;

EID: 0036910852     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.01724.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Nowak B. Taking advantage of sophisticated pacemaker diagnostics. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83:172D-179D.
2. Cazeau S, Ritter P, Nitzsche R, et al. Diagnosis of atrial arrhythmias using the Holter function of a new DDD pacemaker. PACE 1994;17:2106-2113.
3. Defaye P, Dournaux F, Mouton E, Prevalence of supraventricular arrhythmias from the automated analysis of data stored in the DDD pacemakers of 617 patients: The AIDA study. The AIDA Multicenter Study Group. Automatic interpretation for diagnosis assistance. PACE 1998; 21:250-255.
4. Limousin M, Geroux L, Nitzsche R, et al. Value of automatic processing and reliability of stored data in an implanted pacemaker: Initial results in 59 patients. PACE 1997; 20:2893-2898.
5. Waktare JE, Malik M. Holter, loop recorder, and event counter capabilities of implanted devices. PACE 1997; 20:2658-2669.
6. Israel CW, Bockenforde JB. Pacemaker event counters: Possible sources of error in calculation of AV synchrony in VDD single lead systems as an example for present limitations. PACE 1998; 21:489-493.
7. Wiegand UKH, Bode F, Schneider R, et al. Diagnosis of atrial undersensing in dual chamber pacemakers: Impact of autodiagnostic features. PACE 1999; 22:894-902.
8. Jacobs LJ, Kerzner JS, Diamond MA, et al. Pacemaker inhibition by myopotentials detected by Holter monitoring. PACE 1982; 5:30-33.
9. Van Gelder LM, El Gamal MIH. Undersensing in VVI-pacemakers detected by Holter monitoring. PACE 1988; 11:1507-1511.
10. Brandes A, Gonska BD, Distler WK, et al. The reliability of computer-assisted long-term ECG analysis of pacemaker malfunction in patients with ventricular demand pacemakers. Z Kardiol 1994; 83:351-358.
11. Furman S, Hayes D, Holmes D. A Practice of Cardiac Pacing. 3rd Ed. Mount Kisco, New York, Futura Publishing Company, Inc., 1993.
12. Nowak B, Middeldorf T, Housworth CM, et al. Holter recordings with continuous marker annotations: A new tool in pacemaker diagnostics. PACE 1996; 19:1791-1795.
13. Denes P. The importance of derived 12-lead electrocardiography in the interpretation of arrhythmias detected by Holter recording. Am Heart J 1992; 124:905-911.
14. Bongiorni MG, Soldati E, Paperini L, et al. Evaluation of rate-responsive pacemakers by transesophageal Holter monitoring of spontaneous atrial rate. PACE 1990; 13:1755-1760.
15. Sorgato A, Marchetti A, Simoncelli U, et al. Holter monitoring with a pill-shaped esophageal electrode. G Ital Cardiol 1991; 21:661-668.
16. Bode F, Wiegand U, Katus HA, et al. Inhibition of ventricular stimulation in patients with dual chamber pacemakers and prolonged AV conduction. PACE 1999; 22:1425-1431.