Holter recordings with continuous marker annotations: A new tool in pacemaker diagnostics

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 19, Issue 11 II, 1996, Pages 1791-1795

  Nowak, Bernd ^a   Middeldorf, Thomas ^b   Housworth, Craig M ^b   Brüls, Annette ^b   Liebrich, Andreas ^b   Rosocha, Stefan ^b   Voigtländer, Thomas ^b   Himmrich, Ewald ^b   Meyer, Jürgen ^b  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Holter recording; marker annotations; telemetry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DEVICE; FEMALE; HOLTER MONITORING; HUMAN; MALE; PACEMAKER FAILURE; SENSOR; TACHYCARDIA; TELEMETRY;

EID: 0029859356     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03226.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Warnowicz MA, Goldschlager N. Apparent failure to sense (undersensing) caused by oversensing: Diagnostic use of a noninvasively obtained intracardiac electrogram. PACE 1983; 6:1341-1343.
2. Jacobs LJ, Kerzner JS, Diamond MA, et al. Pacemaker inhibition by myopotentials detected by Holter monitoring. PACE 1982; 5:30-33.
3. Secemsky SI, Hauser RG, Denes P, et al. Unipolar sensing abnormalities: Incidence and clinical significance of skeletal muscle interference and undersensing in 228 patients. PACE 1992; 5:10-19.
4. Billhardt RA, Rosenbush SW, Hauser RG. Successful management of pacing system malfunctions without surgery: The role of programmable pulse generators. PACE 1982; 5:675-682.
5. Famularo MA, Kennedy HL. Ambulatory electrocardiography in the assessment of pacemaker function. Am Heart J 1982; 104:1086-1094.
6. Oka Y, Ito T, Sada T, et al. Ambulatory electrocardiograms obtained by Holter monitoring system in patients with permanent demand pacemakers. Jpn Heart J 1985; 26:23-32.
7. Janosik DL, Redd RM, Buckingham TA. Utility of ambulatory electrocardiography in detecting pacemaker dysfunction in the early postimplantation period, Am J Cardiol 1987; 60:1030-1035.
8. Van Gelder LM, El Gamal MIH. Undersensing in VVI pacemakers detected by Holter monitoring. PACE 1988; 11:1507-1511.
9. Bongiorni MG, Soldati E, Paperini L, et al. Evaluation of rate-responsive pacemakers by transesophageal Holter monitoring of spontaneous atrial rate. PACE 1990; 13:1755-1760.
10. Van Gelder LM, Bracke FALE, El Gamal MIH. Fusion or confusion on Holter rcording. PACE 1991; 14:760-763.
11. Lesh MD, Langberg JJ, Griffin JC, et al. Pacemaker generator pseudomalfunction: An artifact of Holter monitoring. PACE 1991; 14:854-857.
12. Stangl K, Wirtzfeld A, Sichart U, et al. Analysis accuracy and susceptibility to faults of Holter functions in diagnostic pacemakers. PACE 1988; 11: 1708-1714.
13. Sermasi S, Marconi M, Marzaloni M. Usefulness of 1-hour and 24-hour heart rate Holter inbuilt in new TX* rate adaptive pacemakers. PACE 1990; 13:1751-1754.
14. Horton RP, Canby RC, Román CA, et al. Diagnosis of ICD lead failure using cntinuous event marker recording. PACE 1995; 18:1331-1334.