The interaction of β2-glycoprotein I domain V with chaperonin GroEL: The similarity with the domain V and membrane interaction

Protein Science

Volumn 11, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 2792-2803

  Gozu, Masayo ^a   Hoshino, Masaru ^a   Higurashi, Takashi ^a   Kato, Hisao ^b   Goto, Yuji ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL CEREBRAL AND CARDIOVASCULAR CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

2 Glycoprotein I; Chaperonin GroEL; Disulfide bond reduction; H 2H exchange; Heteronuclear NMR

Indexed keywords

AMIDE; BETA2 GLYCOPROTEIN 1; CHAPERONIN; DISULFIDE; GLYCOPROTEIN; HYDROGEN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; PROTON; TRYPTOPHAN;

ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; HYDROPHOBICITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PHOSPHOLIPID MEMBRANE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STABILITY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CELL MEMBRANE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; FLUORESCENCE; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BETA 2-GLYCOPROTEIN I; CELL MEMBRANE; DISULFIDES; FLUORESCENCE; GLYCOPROTEINS; GROEL PROTEIN; HUMANS; HYDROGEN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTONS; TRYPTOPHAN;

EID: 0036892448     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.0216602     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bai, Y., Milne, J.S., and Englander, S.W. 1993. Primary structure effects on peptide group hydrogen exchange. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 17: 75-86.
2. Braig, K., Otwinowski, Z., Hegde, R., Boisvert, D.C., Joachimiak, A., Horwich, A.L., and Sigler, P.B. 1994. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å. Nature 371: 578-586.
3. Braig, K., Adams, P.D., and Brünger, A.T. 1995. Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å resolution. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2: 1083-1094.
4. Buchner, J., Schmidt, M., Fuchs, M., Jaenick, R., Rudolph, R., Schmid, F.X., and Kiefhaber, T. 1991. GroE facilitates refolding of citrate synthase by suppressing aggregation. Biochemistry 30: 1586-1591.
5. Buckle, A.M., Zahn, R., and Fersht, A.R. 1997. A structural model for GroELpolypeptide recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94: 3571-3575.
6. Bukau, B. and Horwich, A.L. 1998. The Hsp 70 and Hsp 60 chaperone machines. Cell 92: 351-366.
7. Chatellier, J., Hill, F., and Fersht, A.R. 2000a. From mini chaperone to GroEL 2: Importance of avidity of the multisite ring structure. J. Mol. Biol. 304: 883-896.
8. Chatellier, J., Hill, F., Foster, N.W., Goloubinoff, P., and Fersht, A.R. 2000b. From minichaperone to GroEL 3: Properties of an active single-ring mutant of GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 304: 897-910.
9. Chen, L. and Sigler, P.B. 1999. The crystal structure of a GroEL/peptide complex: Plasticity as a basis for substrate diversity. Cell 99: 757-768.
10. Clark, A.C., Ramanathan, R., and Friden, C. 1998. Purification of GroEL with low fluorescence background. Methods Enzymol. 290: 100-118.
11. Connelly, G.P., Bai, Y., Jeng, M.-F., and Englander, S.W. 1993. Isotope effects in peptide group hydrogen exchange. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 17: 87-92.
12. Coyle, J.E., Jaeger, J., Gross, M., Robinson, C.V., and Radford, S.E. 1997. Structural and mechanistic consequence of polypeptide binding by GroEL. Fold. Des. 2: R93-R104.
13. Coyle, J.E., Texter, F.L., Ashcroft, A.E., Masselos, D., Robinson, C.V., and Radford, S.E. 1999. GroEL accelerates the refolding on hen lysozyme without changing its folding mechanism. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6: 683-690.
14. Delaglio, F., Grzesiek, S., Vuister, G., Zhu, G., Pfeifer, J., and Bax. A. 1995. NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J. Biomol. NMR 6: 277-293.
15. Falke, S., Fisher, M.T., and Gogol, E.P. 2001. Structural changes in GroEL effected by binding a denatured protein substrate. J. Mol. Biol. 308: 569-577.
16. Fenton, W.A. and Horwich, A.L. 1997. GroEL-mediated protein folding. Protein Sci. 6: 743-760.
17. Glaser, M., Wanaski, S., Buser, C.A., Boguslavsky, V., Rashidzada, W., Morris, A., Rebecchi, M., Scarlata, S.F., Runnels, L.W., Prestwich, G.D., Chen, J., Aderem, A., Ahn, J., and McLaughlin, S. 1996. Myrisoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate (MARCKS) produces reversible inhibition of phospholipase C by sequestering phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate in lateral domains. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 26187-26193.
18. Golbik, R., Zahn, R., Harding, S.E., and Fersht, A.R. 1998. Thermodynamic stability and folding of GroEL minichaperones. J. Mol. Biol. 276: 505-515.
19. Goldberg, M.S., Xhang, J., Sondek, S., Matthews, C.R., Fox, R.O., and Horwich, A.L. 1997. Native-like structure of a protein folding intermediate bound to a chaperonin GroEL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94: 1080-1085.
20. 2-glycoprotein I: Effect of specific cleavage between Lys77 and Thr 78. J. Biochem. 121: 128-137.
21. Hartl, F.U. and Hayer-Hartl, M. 2002. Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: From nascent chain to folded protein. Science 295: 1852-1858.
22. Hinderliter, A., Almeida, P.F., Creutz, C.E., and Biltonen, R.L. 2001. Domain formation in a fluid mixed lipid bilayer modulated through binding of the C2 protein motif. Biochemistry 40: 4181-4191.
23. 2glycoprotein I domain V specifically interacts with hydrophobic ligands. Biochemistry 40: 8092-8100.
24. Hoshino, M., Kawata, Y., and Goto, Y. 1996. Interaction of GroEL with conformational states of horse cytochrome c. J. Mol. Biol. 262: 575-587.
25. 2-glycoprotein I domain V by heteronuclear magnetic resonance. J. Mol. Biol. 304: 927-939.
26. 2-glycoprotein I critical for lipid-binding and anticardiolipin antibody cofactor activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 90: 2141-2145.
27. Katsumata, K., Okazaki, A., Tsurupa, G.P., and Kuwajima, K. 1996. Dominant forces in the recognition of a transient folding intermediate of a-lactalbumin by GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 264: 643-649.
28. Kawata, Y., Hongo, K., Mizobata, T., and Nagai, J. 1998. Chaperonin GroEfacilitated refolding of disulfide-bonded and reduced taka-amylase A from Aspergillus oryzae. Protein Eng. 11: 1293-1298.
29. Kawata, Y., Kawagoe, M., Hongo, K., Miyazaki, T., Higurashi, T., Mizobata, T., and Nagai, J. 1999. Functional communications between the apical and equatorial domains of GroEL through the intermediate domain. Biochemistry 38: 15732-15740.
30. Kraulis, P.J. 1991. MOLSCRIPT: A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24: 946-950.
31. Krøll, J., Larsen, J.K., Loft, H., Ezban, M., Wallevik, K., and Faber, M. 1976. DNA-binding proteins in Yoshida acites tumor fluid. Biochm. Biophys. Acta 434: 490-501.
32. Ma, J., Sigler, P.B., Xu, Z., and Karplus, M. 2000. A dynamic model for the allosteric mechanism of GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 302: 303-313.
33. Nieba-Axmann, S.E., Ottiger, M., Wüthrich, K., and Plückthun, A. 1997. Multiple cycles of global unfolding of GroEL-bound cyclophilin A evidenced by NMR. J. Mol. Biol. 271: 803-818.
34. 2-glycoprotein I in the rat: Isolation from serum and demonstrated in lipoprotein density fractions. Int. J. Biochem. 11: 265-270.
35. Rye, R.S., Burston, S.G., Fenton, W.A., Beechem, J.M., Xu, Z., Singler, P.B., and Horwich, A.L. 1997. Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within double ring of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature 388: 792-798.
36. 2-glycoprotein I) which affect phospholipid binding. Hum. Mol. Genet. 6: 311-316.
37. 2-glycoprotein I on the dextran sulfate activation of the contact system (Hageman factor system) in the blood coagulation. Int. J. Biochem. 20: 787-792.
38. Shtilerman, M., Lorimer, G.H., and Englander, S.W. 1999. Chaperonin function: Folding by forced unfolding. Science 284: 821-825.
39. Smoot, A.L., Panda, M., Brazil, B.T., Buckle, B.T., Fersht, A.R., and Horowitz, P.M. 2001. The binding of Bis-ANS to the isolated GroEL apical domain fragment induces the formation of a folding intermediate with increased hydrophobic surface not observed in tetradecameric GroEL. Biochemistry 40: 4484-4492.
40. 2-glycoprotein I. FEBS Lett. 313: 193-197.
41. Taguchi, H., Ueno, T., Tadakuma, H., Yoshida, M., and Funatsu, T. 2001. Single-molecule observation of protein-protein interactions in the chaperonin system. Nat. Biotechnol. 19: 861-865.
42. Wang, Q., Buckle, A.M., and Fersht, A.R. 2000. From minichaperone to GroEL I: Information on GroEL-polypeptide interactions form crystal packing of minichaperones. J. Mol. Biol. 304: 873-881.
43. 2-glycoprotein I (apolipoprotein H) interactions with phosphlipid vesicles. Int. J. Biochem. 16: 511-515.
44. Xu, Z., Horwich, A.L., and Sigler, P.B. 1997. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GoES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature 388: 741-750.
45. Yamasaki, R., Hoshino, M., Wazawa, T., Ishii, Y., Yanagida, T., Kawata, Y., Higurashi, T., Sakai, K., Nagai, J., and Goto, Y. 1999. Single molecular observation of the interaction of GroEL with substrate proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 262: 965-972.
46. Zahn, R., Spitzfaden, C., Ottiger, M., Wüthrich, K., and Plückthun, A. 1994. Destabilization of the complete protein secondary structure on binding to the chaperone GroEL. Nature 368: 261-265.
47. Zahn, R., Perrett, S., Stenberg, G., and Fersht, A.L. 1996. Catalysis of amide proton exchange by the molecular chaperones GroEL and SecB. Science 271: 642-645.