Sequence conserved for subcellular localization

Protein Science

Volumn 11, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 2836-2847

  Nair, Rajesh ^a,b   Rost, Burkhard ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Evolution; Homolog detection; Prediction by homology; Protein function; Sequence conservation threshold; Subcellular localization

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENETIC CONSERVATION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SWISS-PROT; BIOLOGY; CELL; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; METABOLISM; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN TRANSPORT;

EUKARYOTA;

PROTEIN; SIGNAL PEPTIDE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CELLS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DATABASES, PROTEIN; PROTEIN SORTING SIGNALS; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; PROTEINS;

EID: 0036891705     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.0207402     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Abagyan, R.A. and Batalov, S. 1997. Do aligned sequences share the same fold? J. Mol. Biol. 273: 355-368.
2. Alexandrov, N.N. and Soloveyev, V.V. 1998. Statistical significance of ungapped sequence alignments. In HICCS '98: Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing '98. (eds. R.B. Altman, A.K. Dunker, L. Hunter, and T.E. Klein), pp. 463-472. World Scientific, Maui, Hawaii.
3. Altschul, S.F. 1993. A protein alignment scoring system sensitive at all evolutionary distances. J. Mol. Evol. 36: 290-300.
4. Altschul, S.F. and Gish, W. 1996. Local alignment statistics. Meth. Enzymol. 266: 460-480.
5. Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W., and Lipman, D.J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410.
6. Altschul, S., Madden, T., Shaffer, A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D. 1997. Gapped Blast and PSI-Blast: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389-3402.
7. Andrade, M.A., O'Donoghue, S.I., and Rost, B. 1998. Adaptation of protein surfaces to subcellular location. J. Mol. Biol. 276: 517-525.
8. Andrade, M.A., Brown, N.P., Leroy, C., Hoersch, S., de Daruvar, A., Reich, C., Franchini, A., Tamames, J., Valencia, A., Ouzounis, C., et al. 1999. Automated genome sequence analysis and annotation. Bioinformatics 15: 391-412.
9. Ashburner, M. and Drysdale, R. 1994. FlyBase-the Drosophila genetic database. Development 120: 2077-2079.
10. Bairoch, A. and Apweiler, R. 2000. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 45-48.
11. Blake, J.D. and Cohen, F.E. 2001. Pairwise sequence alignment below the twilight zone. J. Mol. Biol. 307: 721-735.
12. Bork, P. and Koonin, E.V. 1998. Predicting functions from protein sequences - Where are the bottlenecks? Nat. Genet. 18:313-318.
13. Brenner, S.E., Chothia, C., and Hubbard, T.J.P. 1998. Assessing sequence comparison methods with reliable structurally identified distant evolutionary relationships. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 6073-6078.
14. Bruce, B.D. 2000. Chloroplast transit peptides: Structure, function and evolution. Trends Cell Biol. 10: 440-447.
15. Casari, G., Andrade, M.A., Bork, P., Boyle, J., Daruvar, A., Ouzounis. C., Schneider, R., Tamames, J., Valencia, A., and Sander, C. 1995. Challenging times for bioinformatics. Nature 376: 647-648.
16. Chothia, C. and Lesk, A.M. 1986. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J. 5: 823-826.
17. Claros, M.G., Brunak, S., and von Heijne, G. 1997. Prediction of N-terminal protein sorting signals. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7: 394-398.
18. Cokol, M., Nair, R., and Rost, B. 2000. Finding nuclear localisation signals. EMBO Reports 1: 411-415.
19. Devos, D. and Valencia, A. 2000. Practical limits of function prediction. Proteins 41: 98-107.
20. 2001. Intrinsic errors in genome annotation. Trends Genet. 17: 429-431.
21. Doolittle, R.F. 1986. Of URFs: A Primer on How to Analyze Derived Amino Acid Sequences. University Science Books, Mill Valley, CA.
22. Drawid, A. and Gerstein, M. 2000. A Bayesian system integrating expression data with sequence patterns for localizing proteins: Comprehensive application to the yeast genome. J. Mol. Biol. 301: 1059-1075.
23. Eisenhaber, F. and Bork, P. 1998. Wanted: Subcellular localization of proteins based on sequence. Trends Cell Biol. 8: 169-170.
24. Emanuelsson, O., Nielsen, H., Brunak, S., and von Heijne, G. 2000. Predicting subcellular localization of proteins based on their N-terminal amino acid sequence. J. Mol. Biol. 300: 1005-1016.
25. Faust, M. and Montenarh, M. 2000. Subcellular localization of protein kinase CK2. A key to its function? Cell Tissue Res. 301: 329-340.
26. Ferrigno, P. and Silver, P.A. 1999. Regulated nuclear localization of stress-responsive factors: How the nuclear trafficking of protein kinases and transcription factors contributes to cell survival. Oncogene 18: 6129-6134.
27. Hegyi, H. and Gerstein, M. 1999. The relationship between protein structure and function: A comprehensive survey with application to the yeast genome. J. Mol. Biol. 288: 147-164.
28. Hobohm, U., Scharf, M., Schneider, R., and Sander, C. 1992. Selection of representative protein data sets. Protein Sci. 1: 409-417.
29. Hua, S. and Sun, Z. 2001. Support vector machine approach for protein subcellular localization prediction. Bioinformatics 17: 721-728.
30. Jaroszewski, L., Rychlewski, L., and Godzik, A. 2000. Improving the quality of twilight-zone alignments. Protein Sci. 9: 1487-1496.
31. Karp, P.D. 1998. What we do not know about sequence analysis and sequence databases. Bioinformatics 14: 753-754.
32. Koonin, E.V. 2000. Bridging the gap between sequence and function. Trends Genet. 16: 16.
33. Koonin, E.V., Bork, P., and Sander, C. 1994. Yeast chromosome III: New gene functions. EMBO J. 13: 493-503.
34. Lewis, S., Ashburner, M., and Reese, M.G. 2000. Annotating eukaryote genomes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10: 349-354.
35. Liscovitch, M., Czarny, M., Fiucci, G., Lavie, Y., and Tang, X. 1999. Localization and possible functions of phospholipase D isozymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1439: 245-263.
36. Liu, J. and Rost, B. 2001. Comparing function and structure between entire proteomes. Protein Sci. 10: 1970-1979.
37. Mattaj, I.W. and Englmeier, L. 1998. Nucleocytoplasmic transport: The soluble phase. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67: 265-306.
38. Murzin, A.G. 1998., How far divergent evolution goes in proteins., Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8: 380-387.
39. Nakai, K. 2001. Prediction of in vivo fates of proteins in the era of genomics and proteomics. J. Struct. Biol. 134: 103-116.
40. Nielsen, H., Engelbrecht, J., Brunak, S., and von Heijne, G. 1997. Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Eng. 10: 1-6.
41. Nielsen, H., Brunak, S., and von Heijne, G. 1999. Machine learning approaches for the prediction of signal peptides and other protein sorting signals. Protein Eng. 12: 3-9.
42. Ouzounis, C., Casari, G., Sander, C., Tamames, J., and Valencia, A. 1996. Computational comparisons of model genomes. Trends Biotechnol. 14: 280-285.
43. Park, J., Karplus, K., Barrett, C., Hughey, R., Haussler, D., Hubbard, T., and Chothia, C. 1998. Sequence comparisons using multiple sequences detect three times as many remote homologues as pairwise methods. J. Mol. Biol. 284: 1201-1210.
44. Pawlowski, K., Jaroszewski, L., Rychlewski, L., and Godzik, A. 2000. Sensitive sequence comparison as protein function predictor. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 8: 42-53.
45. Pearce, D.A. 2000. Localization and processing of CLN3, the protein associated to Batten disease: Where is it and what does it do? J. Neurosci. Res. 59: 19-23.
46. Pearson, W.R. 1995. Comparison of methods for searching protein sequence databases. Protein Sci. 4: 1145-1160.
47. Przybylski, D. and Rost, B. 2002. Alignments grow, secondary structure prediction improves. Proteins 46: 195-205.
48. Reich, J.G. and Meiske, W. 1987. A simple statistical significance test of window scores in large dot matrices obtained from protein or nucleic acid sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 3: 25-30.
49. Reinhardt, A. and Hubbard, T. 1998. Using neural networks for prediction of the subcellular location of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 26: 2230-2235.
50. Rost, B. 1997. Protein structures sustain evolutionary drift. Fold. Des. 2: S19-S24.
51. -. 1998. Marrying structure and genomics. Structure 6: 259-263.
52. -. 1999. Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng. 12: 85-94.
53. -. 2001. Protein secondary structure prediction continues to rise. J. Struct. Biol. 134: 204-218.
54. -. 2002. Enzyme function less conserved than anticipated. J. Mol. Biol. 318: 595-608.
55. Rost, B and Eyrich, V. 2001. EVA: Large-scale analysis of secondary structure prediction. Proteins 45: S192-S199.
56. Rychlewski, L., Zhang, B., and Godzik, A. 1999. Functional insights from structural predictions: Analysis of the Escherichia coli genome. Protein Sci. 8: 614-624.
57. Sander, C. and Schneider, R. 1991. Database of homology-derived structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins 9: 56-68.
58. Schatz, G. and Dobberstein, B. 1996. Common principles of protein translocation across membranes. Science 271: 1519-1526.
59. Schneider, R., Casari, G., Antoine, d.D., Bremer, P., Schlenkrich, M., Mercille, R., Vollhardt, H., and Sander, C. 1997. GeneCrunch: Experiences on the SGI POWER CHALLENGE array with bioinformatics applications. In Supercomputer 1996: Anwendungen. Architekturen. Trends. pp. 109-119. K.G. Saur Verlag, Germany.
60. Schwarz, E. and Neupert, W. 1994. Mitochondrial protein import: Mechanisms, components and energetics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1187: 270-274.
61. Shah, I. and Hunter, L. 1997. Predicting enzyme function from sequence: Asystematic appraisal. In Fifth international conference on intelligent systems for molecular biology. (ed. T. Gaasterland, P. Karp, K. Karplus, C. Ouzounis, C. Sander, and A. Valencia), pp. 276-283. AAAI Press, Halkidiki, Greece.
62. Sirover, M.A. 1999. New insights into an old protein: The functional diversity of mammalian glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1432: 159-184.
63. Tamames, J., Ouzounis, C., Casari, G., Sander, C., and Valencia, A. 1998. EUCLID: Automatic classification of proteins in functional classes by their database annotations. Bioinformatics 14: 542-543.
64. Teichmann, S., Park, J., and Chothia, C. 1998. Structural assignments to the Mycoplasma genitalium proteins show extensive gene duplication and domain rearrangement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.: 14658-14663.
65. Teichmann, S.A., Chothia, C., and Gerstein, M. 1999. Advances in structural genomics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9: 390-399.
66. Thornton, J.M., Orengo, C.A., Todd, A.E., and Pearl, F.M. 1999. Protein folds, functions and evolution. J. Mol. Biol. 293: 333-342.
67. Todd, A.E., Orengo, C.A., and Thornton, J.M. 2001. Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J. Mol. Biol. 307: 1113-1143.
68. Vitkup, D., Melamud, E., Moult, J., and Sander, C. 2001. Completeness in structural genomics. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8: 559-566.
69. Vogt, G., Etzold, T., and Argos, P. 1995. An assessment of amino acid exchange matrices in aligning protein sequences: The twilight zone revisited. J. Mol. Biol. 249: 816-831.
70. Webb, E.C. 1992. Enzyme Nomenclature 1992. Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology., 1992 Ed. Academic Press, New York.
71. Wilson, C.A., Kreychman, J., and Gerstein, M. 2000. Assessing annotation transfer for genomics: Quantifying the relations between protein sequence, structure and function through traditional and probabilistic scores. J. Mol. Biol. 297: 233-249.
72. Wood, T.C. and Pearson, W.R. 1999. Evolution of protein sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 291: 977-995.
73. Yang, A.S. and Honig, B. 2000a. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. II. On the relationship between sequence and structural similarity for proteins that are not obviously related in sequence. J. Mol. Biol. 301: 679-689.
74. -. 2000b. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. III. A comparative study of sequence conservation in protein structural families using multiple structural alignments. J. Mol. Biol. 301: 691-711.