Cellular patterning of the vertebrate embryo

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 627-635

  Mathis, Luc ^a   Nicolas, Jean Francois ^a  

^a INSTITUT PASTEUR   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; HEPARAN SULFATE;

ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ARTHROPOD; CELL ACTIVITY; CELL FUNCTION; CELL GROWTH; CELL MOTILITY; CELL POPULATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; CHORDATA; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; ECHINODERM; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; GASTRULATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC CONSERVATION; INSECT; METAZOON; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIMITIVE STREAK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; RHOMBENCEPHALON; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UROCHORDATA; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMALS; BODY PATTERNING; CELL MOVEMENT; EMBRYO; EVOLUTION; RHOMBENCEPHALON; UROCHORDATA; VERTEBRATES; XENOPUS;

ARTHROPODA; CHORDATA; ECHINODERMATA; INSECTA; INVERTEBRATA; METAZOA; UROCHORDATA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0036889764     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02806-8     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Russell L.B. Genetic Mosaics and Chimeras in Mammals. 1978;Plenum Press.
2. Davidson E.H., et al. Origin of bilaterian body plans: evolution of developmental regulatory mechanisms. Science. 270:1995;1319-1325.
3. Nishida H., Satoh N. Cell lineage analysis in ascidian embryos by intracellular injection of a tracer enzyme. II. The 16- and 32-cell stages. Dev. Biol. 110:1985;440-454.
4. Tung T.C., et al. The presumptive areas of the egg of Amphioxus. Sci. Sin. 11:1962;629-644.
5. Zhang S.C., et al. Topographic changes in nascent and early mesoderm in Amphioxus embryos studied by Dil labeling and by in situ hybridization for a Brachyury gene. Dev. Genes Evol. 206:1997;532-535.
6. Gehring W.J., Ikeo K. Pax6: mastering eye morphogenesis and eye evolution. Trends Genet. 15:1999;371-377.
7. Moody, S.A., ed. (1999) Cell Lineage and Fate Determination, Academic Press
8. Keller R., Tibbetts P. Mediolateral cell intercalation in the dorsal, axial mesoderm of Xenopus laevis. Dev. Biol. 131:1989;539-549.
9. Wetts R., Fraser S.E. Slow intermixing of cells during Xenopus embryogenesis contributes to the consistency of the blastomere fate map. Development. 105:1989;9-15.
10. Eagleson G.W., Harris W.A. Mapping of the presumptive brain regions in the neural plate of Xenopus laevis. J. Neurobiol. 21:1990;427-440.
11. Keller R., et al. The cellular basis of the convergence and extension of the Xenopus neural plate. Dev. Dyn. 193:1992;199-217.
12. Kimmel C.B., et al. Origin and organization of the zebrafish fate map. Development. 108:1990;581-594.
13. Warga R.M., Kimmel C.B. Cell movements during epiboly and gastrulation in zebrafish. Development. 108:1990;569-580.
14. Woo K., Fraser S.E. Order and coherence in the fate map of the zebrafish nervous system. Development. 121:1995;2595-2609.
15. Schoenwolf G.C., Sheard P. Shaping and bending of the avian neural plate as analysed with a fluorescent-histochemical marker. Development. 105:1989;17-25.
16. Selleck M.A.J., Stern C.D. Fate mapping and cell lineage analysis of Hensen's node in the chick embryo. Development. 112:1991;615-626.
17. Joubin K., Stern C.D. Molecular interactions continuously define the organizer during the cell movements of gastrulation. Cell. 98:1999;559-571.
18. Mathis L., et al. FGF receptor signalling is required to maintain neural progenitors during Hensen's node progression. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:2001;559-566.
19. Lawson K.A., et al. Clonal analysis of epiblast fate during germ layer formation in the mouse embryo. Development. 113:1991;891-911.
20. Gardner R.L., Cockroft D.L. Complete dissipation of coherent clonal growth occurs before gastrulation in mouse epiblast. Development. 125:1998;2397-2402.
21. Mathis L., Nicolas J.F. Different clonal dispersion in the rostral and caudal mouse central nervous system. Development. 127:2000;1277-1290.
22. Keller R.E. The cellular basis of epiboly: an SEM study of deep-cell rearrangement during gastrulation in Xenopus laevis. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 60:1980;201-234.
23. Satoh N., Jeffery W.R. Chasing tails in ascidians: developmental insights into the origin and evolution of chordates. Trends Genet. 11:1995;354-359.
24. Nishida H. Cell lineage analysis in ascidian embryos by intracellular injection of a tracer enzyme. I. Up to the eight-cell stage. Dev. Biol. 121:1987;526-541.
25. Jeffery W.R. Tunicates. Gilbert S.F., Raunio A.M., Embryology: Constructing the Organism. 1997;331-364 Sinauer Associates.
26. Keller R.E., et al. The function and mechanism of convergent extension during gastrulation of Xenopus laevis. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 89:1985;185-209.
27. Kimmel C.B., et al. Cell cycles and clonal strings during formation of the zebrafish central nervous system. Development. 120:1994;265-276.
28. Houart C., et al. A small population of anterior cells patterns the forebrain during zebrafish gastrulation. Nature. 391:1998;788-792.
29. Foley A.C., et al. Reconciling different models of forebrain induction and patterning: a dual role for the hypoblast. Development. 127:2000;3839-3854.
30. Thomas P.Q., et al. Hex: a homeobox gene revealing peri-implantation asymmetry in the mouse embryo and an early transient marker of endothelial cell precursors. Development. 125:1998;85-94.
31. Nicolas J.F., et al. Evidence in the mouse for self-renewing stem cells in the formation of a segmented longitudinal structure, the myotome. Development. 122:1996;2933-2946.
32. Eloy-Trinquet S., et al. Retrospective tracing of the developmental lineage of the mouse myotome. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 47:2000;33-80.
33. Eloy-Trinquet S., Nicolas J.F. Retrospective tracing of the developmental lineage of the mouse myotome. Sanders E., et al. The Origin and Fate of Somites. 329:2001;132-140 IOS Press.
34. Eloy-Trinquet S., Nicolas J.F. Cell coherence during production of the presomitic mesoderm and somitogenesis in the mouse embryo. Development. 129:2002;3609-3619.
35. Eloy-Trinquet S., Nicolas J.F. Clonal separation and regionalisation during formation of the medial and lateral myotomes in the mouse embryo. Development. 129:2002;111-122.
36. Mathis L., Nicolas J.F. Clonal organization in the postnatal mouse central nervous system is prefigured in the embryonic neuroepithelium. Dev. Dyn. 219:2000;277-281.
37. Stern C.D., Fraser S.E. Tracing the lineage of tracing cell lineages. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:2001;E216-E218.
38. Gont L.K., et al. Tail formation as a continuation of gastrulation: the multiple cell populations of the Xenopus tailbud derive from the late blastopore lip. Development. 119:1993;991-1004.
39. Wilson P.A., et al. Cell rearrangement and segmentation in Xenopus: direct observation of cultured explants. Development. 105:1989;155-166.
40. Kanki J.P., Ho R.K. The development of the posterior body in zebrafish. Development. 124:1997;881-893.
41. Keller R., et al. Mechanisms of convergence and extension by cell intercalation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol Sci. 355:2000;897-922.
42. Heisenberg C.P., et al. Silberblick/Wnt11 mediates convergent extension movements during zebrafish gastrulation. Nature. 405:2000;76-81.
43. Beck C.W., Slack J.M. A developmental pathway controlling outgrowth of the Xenopus tail bud. Development. 126:1999;1611-1620.
44. Ciruna B., Rossant J. FGF signaling regulates mesoderm cell fate specification and morphogenetic movement at the primitive streak. Dev. Cell. 1:2001;37-49.
45. Wallingford J.B., et al. Dishevelled controls cell polarity during Xenopus gastrulation. Nature. 405:2000;81-85.
46. Djiane A., et al. Role of frizzled 7 in the regulation of convergent extension movements during gastrulation in Xenopus laevis. Development. 127:2000;3091-3100.
47. Wallingford J.B., Harland R.M. Xenopus Dishevelled signaling regulates both neural and mesodermal convergent extension: parallel forces elongating the body axis. Development. 128:2001;2581-2592.
48. Topczewski J., et al. The zebrafish glypican knypek controls cell polarity during gastrulation movements of convergent extension. Dev. Cell. 1:2001;251-264.
49. Zakany J., et al. Localized and transient transcription of Hox genes suggests a link between patterning and the segmentation clock. Cell. 106:2001;207-217.
50. Dubrulle J., et al. FGF signaling controls somite boundary position and regulates segmentation clock control of spatiotemporal Hox gene activation. Cell. 106:2001;219-232.
51. Munro E.M., Odell G.M. Polarized basolateral cell motility underlies invagination and convergent extension of the ascidian notochord. Development. 129:2002;13-24.
52. Munro E.M., Odell G. Morphogenetic pattern formation during ascidian notochord formation is regulative and highly robust. Development. 129:2002;1-12.
53. Ettensohn C.A. Gastrulation in the sea urchin embryo is accompanied by the rearrangement of invaginating epithelial cells. Dev. Biol. 112:1985;383-390.
54. Irvine K.D., Wieschaus E. Cell intercalation during Drosophila germband extension and its regulation by pair-rule segmentation genes. Development. 120:1994;827-841.
55. Wolpert L. The evolution of development. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 39:1990;109-124.
56. Lawrence P.A., Struhl G. Morphogens, compartments, and pattern: lessons from Drosophila? Cell. 85:1996;951-961.
57. Lumsden A. The cellular basis of segmentation in the developing hindbrain. Trends Neurosci. 13:1990;329-334.
58. Fraser S., et al. Segmentation in the chick embryo hindbrain is defined by cell lineage restrictions. Nature. 344:1990;431-435.
59. Nadarajah B., Parnavelas J.G. Modes of neuronal migration in the developing cerebral cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3:2002;423-432.
60. Mathis L., et al. Successive patterns of clonal cell dispersion in relation to neuromeric subdivision in the mouse neuroepithelium. Development. 126:1999;4095-4106.
61. Wingate R.J.T., Lumsden A. Persistence of rhombomeric organisation in the postsegmental hindbrain. Development. 122:1996;2143-2152.
62. Guthrie S., et al. Selective dispersal of avian rhombomere cells in orthotopic and heterotopic grafts. Development. 118:1993;527-538.
63. Wizenmann A., Lumsden A. Segregation of rhombomeres by differential chemoaffinity. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 9:1997;448-459.
64. Xu Q., et al. Expression of truncated Sek-1 receptor tyrosine kinase disrupts the segmental restriction of gene expression in the Xenopus and zebrafish hindbrain. Development. 121:1995;4005-4016.
65. Xu Q., et al. In vivo cell sorting in complementary segmental domains mediated by Eph receptors and ephrins. Nature. 399:1999;267-271.
66. Theil T., et al. Segmental expression of the EphA4 (Sek-1) receptor tyrosine kinase in the hindbrain is under direct transcriptional control of Krox-20. Development. 125:1998;443-452.
67. Moens C.B., et al. Equivalence in the genetic control of hindbrain segmentation in fish and mouse. Development. 125:1998;381-391.
68. Concha M.L., Adams R.J. Oriented cell divisions and cellular morphogenesis in the zebrafish gastrula and neurula: a time-lapse analysis. Development. 125:1998;983-994.
69. Davidson L.A., Keller R.E. Neural tube closure in Xenopus laevis involves medial migration, directed protrusive activity, cell intercalation and convergent extension. Development. 126:1999;4547-4556.
70. Davidson E.H. Genomic Regulatory Systems. 2001;Academic Press.
71. Holland, P.W. et al. (1994) Gene duplications and the origins of vertebrate development. Development (Suppl), 125-133
72. McLysaght A., et al. Extensive genomic duplication during early chordate evolution. Nat. Genet. 31:2002;200-204.
73. Bird A.P. Functions for DNA methylation in vertebrates. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 58:1993;281-285.
74. Kimmel C.B., Warga R.M. Indeterminate cell lineage of the zebrafish embryo. Dev. Biol. 124:1987;269-280.