Selective impairments in rats on an odor-guided continuous delayed nonmatching-to-sample (cDNMS) task after fornix transection

Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

Volumn 26, Issue 7-8, 2002, Pages 1291-1301

  Hudon, Carol ^a,b   Allen, Kevin ^a,b   Potvin, Olivier ^a,b   Doré, François Y ^a,b   Goulet, Sonia ^a,b  

^a CENTRE DE RECHERCHE DE L INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE EN SANTÉ MENTALE DE QUÉBEC   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

DNMS; Fornix; Hippocampus; Nonspatial memory; Rats; Recognition

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BRAIN DYSFUNCTION; BRAIN FORNIX; BRAIN INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; NONHUMAN; ODOR; RAT; RECOGNITION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING;

ANIMALS; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FORNIX (BRAIN); MALE; ODORS; RATS; RATS, LONG-EVANS; SMELL; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0036889651     PISSN: 02785846     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0278-5846(02)00292-0     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Aggleton J.P., Brown B.W. Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal-anterior thalamic axis. Behav. Brain Sci. 22:1999;425-489.
2. Aggleton J.P., Hunt P.R., Rawlins J.N.P. The effects of hippocampal lesions upon spatial and non-spatial tests of working memory. Behav. Brain Res. 19:1986;133-146.
3. Aggleton J.P., Keith A.B., Rawlins J.N.P., Hunt P.R., Sahgal A. Removal of the hippocampus and transection of the fornix produce comparable deficits on delayed non-matching to position by rats. Behav. Brain Res. 52:1992;61-71.
4. Alvarado M.C., Rudy J.W. A comparison of "configural" discrimination problems: implications for understanding the role of the hippocampal formation in learning and memory. Psychobiology. 23:1995;178-184.
5. Alvarado M.C., Rudy J.W. A comparison of kainic acid plus colchicine and ibotenic acid-induced hippocampal formation damage on four configural tasks in rats. Behav. Neurosci. 109:1995;1052-1062.
6. Alvarado M.C., Rudy J.W. Rats with damage to the hippocampal-formation are impaired on the transverse-patterning problem but not on elemental discriminations. Behav. Neurosci. 109:1995;204-211.
7. Alvarez P., Zola-Morgan S., Squire L.R. Damage limited to the hippocampal region produces long-lasting memory impairment in monkeys. J. Neurosci. 15:1995;3796-3807.
8. Bachevalier J., Parkinson J.K., Mishkin M. Visual recognition in monkeys: effects of separate vs. combined transection of fornix and amygdalofugal pathways. Exp. Brain Res. 57:1985;554-561.
9. Bachevalier J., Saunders R.C., Mishkin M. Visual recognition in monkeys: effects of transection of fornix. Exp. Brain Res. 57:1985;547-553.
10. Baxter M.G., Murray E.A. Opposite relationship of hippocampal and rhinal cortex damage to delayed nonmatching-to-sample deficits in monkeys. Hippocampus. 11:2001;61-71.
11. Beason-Held L.L., Rosene D.L., Killiany R.J., Moss M.B. Hippocampal formation lesions produce memory impairment in the rhesus monkey. Hippocampus. 9:1999;562-574.
12. Bunsey M., Eichenbaum H. Selective damage to the hippocampal region blocks long term retention of a natural and nonspatial stimulus-stimulus association. Hippocampus. 5:1995;546-556.
13. Bunsey M., Eichenbaum H. Conservation of hippocampal memory function in rats and humans. Nature. 379:1996;255-257.
14. Burton S., Murphy D., Qureshi U., Sutton P., O'Keefe J. Combined lesions of hippocampus and subiculum do not produce deficits in a nonspatial social olfactory memory task. J. Neurosci. 20:2000;5468-5475.
15. Bussey T.J., Warburton E.C., Aggleton J.P., Muir J.L. Fornix lesions can facilitate acquisition of the transverse patterning task: a challenge for "configural" theories of hippocampal function. J. Neurosci. 18:1998;1622-1631.
16. Cassaday H.J., Rawlins J.N.P. Fornix-fimbria section and working memory deficits in rats: stimulus complexity and stimulus size. Behav. Neurosci. 109:1995;594-606.
17. Clark R.E., West A., Zola S., Squire L.R. Object recognition memory is impaired in rats with lesions limited to the hippocampus. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 26:2000;466.
18. Clark R.E., West A.N., Zola S.M., Squire L.R. Rats with lesions of the hippocampus are impaired on the delayed nonmatching-to-sample task. Hippocampus. 11:2001;176-186.
19. Davidson T.L., McKernan M.G., Jarrard L.E. Hippocampal lesions do not impair negative patterning: a challenge to configural association theory. Behav. Neurosci. 107:1993;227-234.
20. Dusek J., Eichenbaum H. The hippocampus and memory for orderly stimulus relations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;7109-7114.
21. Duva C.A., Floresco S.B., Wunderlich G.R., Lao T.L., Pinel J.P.J., Phillips A.G. Disruption of spatial but not object-recognition memory by neurotoxic lesions of the dorsal hippocampus in rats. Behav. Neurosci. 111:1997;1184-1196.
22. Eichenbaum H. Is the rodent hippocampus just for place? Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 6:1996;187-195.
23. Eichenbaum H., Dudchenko P., Wood E., Shapiro M., Tanila H. The hippocampus, memory and place cells: is it spatial memory or a memory space? Neuron. 23:1999;209-226.
24. Eichenbaum H., Otto T., Cohen N.J. Two functional components of the hippocampal memory system. Behav. Brain Sci. 17:1994;449-518.
25. Ennaceur A., Aggleton J.P. Spontaneous recognition of object configurations in rats: effects of fornix lesions. Exp. Brain Res. 100:1994;85-92.
26. Ennaceur A., Aggleton J.P. The effects of neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal cortex combined to fornix transection on object recognition memory in the rat. Behav. Brain Res. 88:1997;181-193.
27. Ennaceur A., Neave N., Aggleton J.P. Neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal cortex do not mimic the behavioural effects of fornix transection in the rat. Behav. Brain Res. 80:1996;9-25.
28. Ennaceur A., Neave N., Aggleton J.P. Spontaneous object recognition and object location memory in rats: the effects of lesions in the cingulate cortices, the medial prefrontal cortex, the cingulum bundle and the fornix. Exp. Brain Res. 113:1997;509-519.
29. Gaffan D. Scene-specific memory for objects: a model of episodic memory impairment in monkeys with fornix transection. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 6:1994;305-320.
30. Gaffan D., Gaffan E.A., Harrison S. Effects of fornix transection on spontaneous and trained non-matching by monkeys. Quat. J. Exp. Psychol. 36B:1984;285-303.
31. Gallagher M., Holland P.C. Preserved configural learning and spatial learning impairment in rats with hippocampal damage. Hippocampus. 2:1992;81-88.
32. Howell D.C., 1997. Statistical Methods for Psychology. 4th ed. Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA.
33. Jagielo J.A., Nonneman A.J., Isaac W.L., Jackson-Smith P.A. Hippocampal lesions impair rats' performance of a nonspatial matching-to-sample task. Psychobiology. 18:1990;55-62.
34. Meunier M., Bachevalier J., Mishkin M., Murray E.A. Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus monkeys. J. Neurosci. 13:1993;5418-5432.
35. Mishkin M. Memory in monkeys severely impaired by combined but not separate removal of amygdala and hippocampus. Nature. 273:1978;297-298.
36. Muller R.U. A quarter of a century of place cells. Neuron. 17:1996;813-822.
37. Mumby D.G., Pinel J.P.J. Rhinal cortex lesions and object recognition in rats. Behav. Neurosci. 108:1994;11-18.
38. Mumby D.G., Wood E.R., Pinel J.P.J. Object-recognition memory is only mildly impaired in rats with lesions of the hippocampus and amygdala. Psychobiology. 20:1992;18-27.
39. Mumby D.G., Pinel J.P.J., Kornecook T.J., Shen M.J., Redila V.A. Memory deficits following lesions of hippocampus or amygdala in rat: assessment by an object-memory test battery. Psychobiology. 23:1995;26-36.
40. Murray E.A., Mishkin M. Severe tactual as well as visual memory deficits following combined removal of the amygdala and hippocampus in monkeys. J. Neurosci. 4:1984;2565-2580.
41. Murray E.A., Mishkin M. Visual recognition in monkeys following rhinal cortical ablations combined with either amygdalectomy or hippocampectomy. J. Neurosci. 6:1986;1991-2003.
42. Murray E.A., Mishkin M. Object recognition and location memory in monkeys with excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala and hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 18:1998;6568-6582.
43. Murray E.A., Malkova L., Goulet S. Cross-modal associations, intramodal associations, and object identification in macaque monkeys. Milner A.D. Comparative Neuropsychology. 1998;51-69 Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
44. Nadel L. The hippocampus and space revisited. Hippocampus. 1:1991;221-229.
45. Nadel L. Multiple memory systems: what and why, an update. Schacter D.L., Tulving E. Memory Systems. 1994;39-63 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
46. O'Keefe J. A review of the hippocampal place cells. Prog. Neurobiol. 13:1979;419-439.
47. Olton D.S., Becker J.T., Handelmann G.E. Hippocampus, space, and memory. Behav. Brain Sci. 2:1979;313-365.
48. Otto T., Eichenbaum H. Neuronal activity in the hippocampus during delayed non-match to sample performance in rats: evidence for hippocampal processing in recognition memory. Hippocampus. 2:1992;323-334.
49. Otto T., Eichenbaum H. Complementary roles of the orbital prefrontal cortex and the perirhinal-entorhinal cortices in an odor-guided delayed-nonmatching-to-sample task. Behav. Neurosci. 106:1992;762-775.
50. Parkinson J.K., Murray E.A., Mishkin M. A selective mnemonic role for the hippocampus in monkeys: memory for the location of objects. J. Neurosci. 8:1988;4159-4167.
51. Paxinos G., Watson C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. 2nd Ed. 1986;Academic Press, New York.
52. Raffaele K.C., Olton D.S. Hippocampal and amygdaloid involvement in working memory for nonspatial stimuli. Behav. Neurosci. 102:1988;349-355.
53. Rawlins J.N.P. Associations across time: the hippocampus as a temporary memory store. Behav. Brain Sci. 8:1985;479-496.
54. Rawlins J.N.P., Lyford G.L., Seferiades A., Deacon R.M.J., Cassaday H.J. Critical determinants of nonspatial working memory deficits in rats with conventional lesions of the hippocampus or fornix. Behav. Neurosci. 107:1993;420-433.
55. Rothblat L.A., Kromer L.F. Object recognition memory in the rat: the role of the hippocampus. Behav. Brain Res. 42:1991;25-32.
56. Rudy J.W., Sutherland R.J. The hippocampal formation is necessary for rats to learn and remember configural discriminations. Behav. Brain Res. 34:1989;97-109.
57. Rudy J.W., Sutherland R.J. Configural association theory and the hippocampal formation: an appraisal and reconfiguration. Hippocampus. 5:1995;375-389.
58. Shaw C., Aggleton J.P. The effects of fornix and medial prefrontal lesions on delayed non-matching-to-sample by rats. Behav. Brain Res. 54:1993;91-102.
59. Solomon P.R., Vander Schaaf E.R., Thompson R.F., Weisz D.J. Hippocampus and trace conditioning of the rabbit's classically conditioned nictitating membrane response. Behav. Neurosci. 100:1986;729-744.
60. Suzuki W.A., Zola-Morgan S., Squire L.R., Amaral D.G. Lesions of the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices in the monkey produce long-lasting memory impairment in the visual and tactual modalities. J. Neurosci. 13:1993;2430-2451.
61. Wan H., Aggleton J.P., Brown M.W. Different contributions of the hippocampus and perirhinal cortex to recognition memory. J. Neurosci. 19:1999;1142-1148.
62. Wiig K.A., Bilkey D.K. Lesions of rat perirhinal cortex exacerbate the memory deficit observed following damage to the fimbria-fornix. Behav. Neurosci. 109:1995;620-630.
63. Wood E.R., Dudchenko P.A., Eichenbaum H. The global record of memory in hippocampal neuronal activity. Nature. 397:1999;613-616.
64. Wörtwein G., Holm Saerup L., Charlottenfeld-Starpov D., Mogensen J. Place learning by fimbria-fornix transected rats in a modified water maze. Int. J. Neurosci. 82:1995;71-81.
65. Yee B.K., Rawlins J.N.P. The effects of hippocampal formation ablation or fimbria-fornix section on performance of a nonspatial radial arm maze task by rats. J. Neurosci. 14:1994;3766-3774.
66. Zola S.M., Squire L.R. Relationship between magnitude of damage to the hippocampus and impaired recognition memory in monkeys. Hippocampus. 11:2001;92-98.
67. Zola S.M., Squire L.R., Teng E., Stefanacci L., Buffalo E.A., Clark R.E. Impaired recognition memory in monkeys after damage limited to the hippocampal region. J. Neurosci. 20:2000;451-463.
68. Zola-Morgan S., Squire L.R. Memory impairment in monkeys following lesions limited to the hippocampus. Behav. Neurosci. 100:1986;155-160.
69. Zola-Morgan S., Squire L.R., Amaral D.G. Lesions of the hippocampal formation but not of the fornix or the mammillary nuclei produce long-lasting memory impairment in monkeys. J. Neurosci. 9:1989;898-913.
70. Zola-Morgan S., Squire L.R., Amaral D.G. Lesions of the amygdala that spare adjacent cortical regions do not impair memory or exacerbate the impairment following lesions of the hippocampal formation. J. Neurosci. 9:1989;1922-1936.
71. Zola-Morgan S., Squire L.R., Amaral D.G., Suzuki W.A. Lesions of perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex that spare the amygdala and hippocampal formation produce severe memory impairment. J. Neurosci. 9:1989;4355-4370.
72. Zola-Morgan S., Squire L.R., Clower R.P., Rempel N.L. Damage to the perirhinal cortex exacerbates memory impairment following lesions to the hippocampal formation. J. Neurosci. 13:1993;251-265.
73. Zola-Morgan S., Squire L.R., Ramus S.J. Severity of memory impairment in monkeys as a function of locus and extent of damage within the medial temporal lobe memory system. Hippocampus. 4:1994;483-495.
74. Zola-Morgan S., Squire L.R., Ramus S.J. The role of the hippocampus in declarative memory: a reply to Nadel. Hippocampus. 5:1995;235-239.