Relationship between magnitude of damage to the hippocampus and impaired recognition memory in monkeys

Hippocampus

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 92-98

  Zola, Stuart M ^a,b,c   Squire, Larry R ^d,e  

^a VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Correlation; Declarative memory; Ibotenic acid; Meta analysis; Multiple regression; Radio frequency lesions; Recognition memory

Indexed keywords

AMNESIA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COVARIANCE; DATA ANALYSIS; HIPPOCAMPUS; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; META ANALYSIS; MONKEY; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; STATISTICS; VALIDATION PROCESS; VARIANCE;

EID: 0035035223     PISSN: 10509631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.1027     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alvarez P, Zola‐Morgan S, Squire LR. 1995. Damage limited to the hippocampal region produces long‐lasting memory impairment in monkeys. J Neurosci 15: 3796–3807.
2. Bachevalier J, Mishkin MM. 1989. Mnemonic and neuropathological effects of occluding the posterior cerebral artery in Macaca mulatta. Neuropsychology 27: 83–105.
3. Bachevalier J, Saunders RC, Mishkin M. 1985. Visual recognition in monkeys: effects of transection of fornix. Exp Brain Res 57: 547–553.
4. Baxter MG, Murray EA. 2001. Opposite relationship of hippocampal and rhinal cortex damage to delayed nonmatching‐to‐sample deficits in monkeys. Hippocampus 11: 61–71.
5. Beason‐Held LL, Rosene DL, Killiany RJ, Moss MB. 1999. Hippocampal formation lesions produce memory impairment in the rhesus monkey. Hippocampus 9: 562–574.
6. Eichenbaum H. 1997. Declarative memory: insights from cognitive psychology. Annu Rev Psychol 48: 547–572.
7. Finger S. 1978. Recovery from brain damage: research and theory. New York: Plenum Press.
8. Finger S, Stein DG. 1982. Brain damage and recovery: research and clinical perspectives. New York: Academic Press.
9. Friedman H. 1972. Introduction to statistics. New York: Random House.
10. Glass GV, Hopkins KD. 1984. Statistical methods in education and psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall, Inc.
11. Hammond KR, Householder JE. 1962. Introduction to the statistical method. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
12. Hedges L, Olkin I. 1985. Statistical methods for meta‐analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
13. Isseroff A, Leveton L, Freeman G, Lewis ME, Stein DG. 1976. Differences in the behavioral effects of single‐stage and serial lesions of the hippocampus. Exp Neurol 53: 339–354.
14. Jarrard LE. 1986. Selective hippocampal lesions and behavior: implications for current research and theorizing. In: Isaacson RL, Pribram KH, editors. The hippocampus, volume 4. New York: Plenum Press. p 93–126.
15. Morris RGM, Schenk F, Tweedie F, Jarrard LE. 1990. Ibotenate lesions of the hippocampus/or subiculum: dissociating components of allocentric spatial learning. Eur J Neurosci 2: 1016–1028.
16. Moser E, Moser M‐B, Andersen P. 1993. Spatial learning impairment parallels the magnitude of dorsal hippocampal lesions, but is hardly present following ventral lesions. J Neurosci 13: 3916–3925.
17. Moser M‐B, Moser E, Forrest E, Andersen P, Morris RGM. 1995. Spatial learning with a minislab in the dorsal hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 9697–9701.
18. Murray EA, Mishkin M. 1998. Object recognition and location memory in monkeys with excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala and hippocampus. J Neurosci 18: 6568–6582.
19. Petetti DB. 2000. Meta‐analysis, decision analysis, and cost‐effectiveness analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Rempel‐Clower NL, Zola SM, Squire LR, Amaral DG. 1996. Three cases of enduring memory impairment after bilateral damage limited to the hippocampal formation. J Neurosci 16: 5233–5255.
21. Ringo JL. 1988. Seemingly discrepant data from hippocampectomized macaques are reconciled by detectability analyses. Behavioral Neurosci 102: 173–177.
22. Ringo JL. 1991. Memory decays at the same rate in macaques with and without brain lesions when expressed in d′ or arcsine terms. Behav Brain Res 42: 123–134.
23. Rosenthal R. 1987. Judgement studies design, analysis, and meta‐analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Squire LR. 1992. Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys and humans. Psychol Rev 99: 195–231.
25. Squire LR, Zola SM. 1996. Ischemic brain damage and memory impairment: a commentary. Hippocampus 6: 546–552.
26. Stein DG, Rosen JJ, Graziadei J, Mishkin D, Brink JJ. 1969. Central nervous system: recovery and function. Science 166: 528–530.
27. Yule GU. 1903. Notes on the theory of association of attributes in statistics. Biometrika 2: 121–134.
28. Zola SM, Squire LR, Teng E, Stefanacci L, Buffalo EA, Clark RE. 2000. Impaired recognition memory in monkeys after damage limited to the hippocampal region. J Neurosci 20: 451–463.
29. Zola‐Morgan S, Squire LR. 1986. Memory impairment in monkeys following lesions limited to the hippocampus. Behavioral Neurosci 100: 155–160.
30. Zola‐Morgan S, Squire LR, Rempel NL, Clower RP, Amaral DG. 1992. Enduring memory impairment in monkeys after ischemic damage to the hippocampus. J Neurosci 9: 4355–4370.
31. Zola‐Morgan S, Squire LR. 1993. Neuroanatomy of memory. Ann Rev Neurosci 16: 547–563.
32. Zola‐Morgan S, Squire LR, Ramus SJ. 1994. Severity of memory impairment in monkeys as a function of locus and extent of damage within the medial temporal lobe memory system. Hippocampus 4: 483–495.