Combined lesions of hippocampus and subiculum do not produce deficits in a nonspatial social olfactory memory task

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 20, Issue 14, 2000, Pages 5468-5475

  Burton, Stephen ^a   Murphy, David ^a   Qureshi, Uzma ^a   Sutton, Patrick ^a   O'Keefe, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Amygdala; Food preference; Hippocampus; Memory; Nonspatial; Social transmission; Subiculum

Indexed keywords

CLOVE OIL; FLAVORING AGENT; THYME OIL;

AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN REGION; CINNAMON; CONTROLLED STUDY; CURCUMA LONGA; FOOD PREFERENCE; GARLIC; HIPPOCAMPUS; LEARNING; MALE; MAZE TEST; MEMORY; NONHUMAN; OLFACTORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; PATHOGENESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SUBICULUM;

EID: 0034662298     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.20-14-05468.2000     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Aggleton JP, Hunt PR, Rawlins JNP (1986) The effects of hippocampal lesions upon spatial and non-spatial tests of working memory. Behav Brain Res 19:133-146.
2. Aggleton JP, Neave N, Nagle S, Sahgal A (1995) A comparison of the effects of medial prefrontal, cingulate cortex, and cingulum bundle lesions on tests of spatial memory: evidence of a double dissociation between frontal and cingulum bundle contributions. J Neurosci 15:7270-7281.
3. Barnes CA (1988) Spatial learning and memory processes: the search for their neurobiological mechanisms in the rat. Trends Neurosci 11:163-169.
4. Beck M, Galef Jr BG (1989) Social influences on the selection of a protein-sufficient diet by Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus). J Comp Psychol 103:132-139.
5. Bunsey M, Eichenbaum H (1995) Selective damage to the hippocampal region blocks long-term retention of a natural and non-spatial stimulus-stimulus association. Hippocampus 5:546-556.
6. Bussey TJ, Warburton C, Aggleton JP, Muir JL (1998) Fornix lesions can facilitate acquisition of the transverse patterning task: a challenge for "configural" theories of hippocampal function. J Neurosci 18:1622-1631.
7. Cohen NJ, Eichenbaum H (1991) The theory that wouldn't die: a critical look at the spatial mapping theory of hippocampal function. Hippocampus 1:265-268.
8. Cohen NJ, Eichenbaum H (1993) Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
9. Fellows BJ (1967) Chance stimulus sequences for discrimination tasks. Psychol Bull 67:87-92.
10. Galef Jr BG, Wigmore SW (1983) Transfer of information concerning distant foods: a laboratory investigation of the "information-centre" hypothesis. Anim Behav 31:748-758.
11. Galef Jr BG, Mason RJ, Preti G, Bean JN (1988) Carbon disulflde: a semiochemical mediating socially-induced diet choice in rats. Physiol Behav 42:119-124.
12. Jarrard LE (1989) On the use of ibotenic acid to lesion selectively different components of the hippocampal formation. J Neurosci Methods 29:251-259.
13. Jarrard LE (1993) On the role of the hippocampus in learning and memory in the rat. Behav Neural Biol 60:9-26.
14. Neave N, Nagle S, Aggleton JP (1997) Evidence for the involvement of the mammillary bodies and cingulum bundle in allocentric spatial processing by rats. Eur J Neurosci 9:941-945.
15. O'Keefe J, Nadel L (1978) The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Clarendon.
16. Paxinos G, Watson C (1986) The rat brain in stereotaxic co-ordinates. Toronto: Academic.
17. Paxinos G, Watson C (1997) The rat brain in stereotaxic co-ordinates. Toronto: Academic.
18. Winocur G (1990) Anterograde and retrograde amnesia in rats with dorsal hippocampal or dorsomedial thalamic lesions. Behav Brain Res 38: 145-154.