Analysis of the experimental variability in wheat responses to elevated CO2 and temperature

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

Volumn 93, Issue 1-3, 2002, Pages 227-247

  Wolf, J ^a   Van Oijen, M ^b   Kempenaar, C ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Climate change; CO2 enrichment; Crop production; Experimental variability; Simulation model; Wheat

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; TEMPERATURE; WHEAT;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 0036889191     PISSN: 01678809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00353-X     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Allen, M.R., Stott, P.A., Mitchell, J.F.B., Schnur. R., Delworth, T.L., 2000. Quantifying the uncertainty in forecasts of anthropogenic climate change. Nature 407, 617-620.
2. Bancal, P., Triboi, E., 1993. Temperature effect on fructan oligomer contents and fructan-related enzyme activities in stems of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) during grain filling. New Phytol. 123, 247-253.
3. Barrow, E.M., Hulme, M., Semenov, M.A., Brooks, R.J., 2000. Climate Change Scenarios. In: Downing, T.E., Harrison, P.A., Butterfield, R.E., Lonsdale, K.G. (Eds.), Final Report of CLIVARA Project (Climate Change, Climatic Variability and Agriculture in Europe: An Integrated Assessment). Research report no. 21, Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, pp. 11-27.
4. Bender, J., Hertstein, U., Black, C.R., 1999. Growth and yield responses of spring wheat to increasing carbon dioxide, ozone and physiological stresses: A statistical analysis of 'ESPACE-wheat' results, ozone and physiological stresses: A statistical analysis of 'ESPACE-wheat' results. Eur. J. Agron. 10, 185-195.
5. Boote, K.J., Jones, J.W., Picketing, N.B., 1996. Potential uses and limitations of crop models. Agron. J. 88, 704-716.
6. Charles-Edwards, D.A., 1982. Physiological Determinants of Crop Growth. Academic Press, Sydney.
7. Cure, J.D., Acock, B., 1986. Crop responses to carbon dioxide doubling: A literature survey. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 38, 127-145.
8. 2 concentration, temperature and nitrogen supply on the photosynthesis and composition of winter wheat leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 17, 1205-1213.
9. 2 and ozone for different sites and years in Europe using mechanistic crop simulation models. Eur. J. Agron. 10, 231-247.
10. 2, nitrogen supply and tropospheric ozone on spring wheat. Part I. Growth and yield. Environ. Pollut. 91, 381-390.
11. 2, nitrogen supply and tropospheric ozone on spring wheat. Part II. Nutrients N, P, K, S, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn. Environ. Pollut. 96, 43-59.
12. Fangmeier, A., Grüters. U., Hertstein, U., Vermehren, B., Jäger, H.-J., 1997b. Final Report of the ESPACE-wheat Open-top Chamber Experiments 1994-1996 at Giessen. Institute für Pflanzenökologie, Justus-Liebig Universität Giessen, Giessen, Germany, 86 p.
13. Farquhar, G.D., Von Caemmerer, S., 1982. Modelling of photosynthetic response to environmental conditions. In: Lange, O.L., Nobel, P.S., Osmond, C.B., Ziegler, H. (Eds.), Physiological Plant Ecology. Encyclopaedia of Plant Physiology, Vol. 12B, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 549-588.
14. Ferris, R., Wheeler, T.R., Ellis, R.H., Hadley, P., Wollenweber, B., Porter, J.R., Karacostas, T.S., Papadopoulos, M.N., Schellberg, J., 2000. Effects of high temperature extremes on wheat. In: Downing, T.E., Harrison, P.A., Butterfield, R.E., Lonsdale, K.G. (Eds.), Final Report of CLIVARA Project (Climate Change, Climatic Variability and Agriculture in Europe: An Integrated Assessment). Research Report no. 21, Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, pp. 31-55.
15. 2 concentration and temperature: Long-term vs. short-term distinctions for modelling. Global Change Biol. 1, 385-396.
16. Hunsaker, D.J., Kimball, B.A., Pinter, P.J., LaMorte, R.L., Wall, G.W., 1996. Carbon dioxide enrichment and irrigation effects on wheat evapotranspiration and water use efficiency. Trans. ASAE 39, 1345-1355.
17. 2 enrichment in the face of environmental constraints: A review of the past 10 years' research. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 69, 153-203.
18. IPCC, 1996. Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change. In: Houghton, J.T., Meira Filho, L.G., Callander, B.A., Kattenberg, A., Maskell, K. (Eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
19. Jäger, H.J., Hertstein, U., Fangmeier, A., 1999. The European stress physiology and climate experiment-project 1: Wheat (ESPACE-wheat): Introduction, aims and methodology, aims and methodology. Eur. J. Agron. 10, 155-162.
20. 2 enrichment. Glob. Change Biol. 1, 429-442.
21. 2 enrichment (FACE) and soil nitrogen effects on energy balance and evapotranspiration of wheat. Water Resour. Res. 35, 1179-1190.
22. Kooman, P.L., Spitters, C.J.T., 1995. Coherent set of models to simulate potato growth. In: Kabat, P., Marshall, B., Van den Broek, B.J., Vos, J., Van Keulen, H. (Eds.), Modelling and Parameterisation of the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere System. A Comparison of Potato Growth Models. Wageningen Press, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 253-274.
23. Lawlor, D.W., Mitchell, R.A.C., 2000. Crop ecosystem responses to climatic change: Wheat. In: Reddy, K.R., Hodges, H.F. (Eds.), Climate Change and Global Crop Productivity. CABI Publishing, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 57-80.
24. Lawlor, D.W., Mitchell, R.A.C., Franklin, J., Mitchell, V.J., Driscoll, S.P., Delgado, E., 1993. Facility for studying the effects of elevated carbon dioxide concentration and increased temperature on crops. Plant Cell Environ. 16, 603-608.
25. 2 enrichment effects on rate and duration of apical development of spring wheat. Crop Sci. 37, 789-796.
26. Miglietta, F., Giuntoli, A., Bindi, M., 1996. The effect of free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) and soil nitrogen availability on the photosynthetic capacity of wheat. Photosynth. Res. 47, 281-290.
27. Mitchell, J.F.B., Johns, T.C., 1997. On modification of global wanning by sulfate aerosols. J. Climate 10, 245-267.
28. 2 concentration and temperature on growth and yield of winter wheat at two levels of nitrogen application. Pl. Cell Environ.16, 521-529.
29. 2 concentration and increased temperature on winter wheat: Test Of ARCWHEAT1 simulation model. Pl. Cell Environ. 18, 736-748.
30. 2. Plant Cell Environ. 19, 615-621.
31. 2 concentrations and stress conditions in the European, multiple-site experiment 'ESPACE-wheat'. Eur. J. Agron. 10, 205-214.
32. 2 enrichment: Responses of cotton and wheat crops. In: Koch, G.W., Mooney, H.A. (Eds.), Carbon Dioxide and Terrestrial Ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego, USA, pp. 215-249.
33. 2 and Soil Nitrogen on Growth and Yield Parameters of Spring Wheat. Annual research report 1996, US Water Conservation Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Phoenix, AZ, USA, pp. 75-78.
34. 2 enrichment (FACE): Blower effects on wheat canopy microclimate and plant development. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 103, 319-332.
35. Porter, J.R., 1993. AFRCWHEAT2: A model of the growth and development of wheat incorporating responses to water and nitrogen. Eur. J. Agron. 2, 69-82.
36. Spitters, C.J.T., 1990. Crop growth models: Their usefulness and limitations. Acta Hortic. 267, 349-368.
37. Triboi, E., Triboi, A.M., Martignac, M., Falcimagne, R., 1996. Experimental device for studying post-anthesis canopy functioning in relation to grain quality. In: Van Ittersum, M.K., Venner, G.E.G.T., Van de Geijn, S.C., Jetten, T.H. (Eds.), Book of Abstracts of the Fourth ESA Congress. European Society of Agronomy, Colmar, France, pp, 68-69.
38. 3: An analysis of open-top chamber experiments by means of two crop growth simulation models. Eur. J. Agron. 10, 249-264.
39. van Oijen, M., Goudriaan, J., 1997. Wageningen Group Final report. European Stress Physiology and Climate Experiment (ESPACE)-Wheat Project Individual Group Report, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 25 p.
40. 2 on development and morphology of spring wheat grown in cooled and non-cooled open-top chambers. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 25, 617-626.
41. 2 on plants? An analysis using spring wheat. Global Change Biol. 5, 411-421.
42. Wolf, J. (Compilator), 1998. Model Evaluation of Experimental Variability to Improve Predictability of Crop Yields Under Climate Change. Final report of the EU MODEXCROP project. University of Essex, Essex, UK; Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark; Wageningen University and Research Center, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 165 p.
43. Wolf, J., Kempenaar, C., 1998. Results frown Wageningen. In: Wolf, J. (Compilator), Model evaluation Of experimental variability to improve predictability of crop yields under climate change. Final report of the EU MODEXCROP project. University of Essex, Essex, UK; Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark; Wageningen University and Research Center, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 3.1-3.106.