A comparison of geographical and neighbourhood models for improving atlas databases. The case of the French butterfly atlas

Biological Conservation

Volumn 108, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 143-159

  Dennis, Roger L H ^a,c   Shreeve, Tim G ^a   Sparks, Tim H ^b   Lhonore, Jacques E ^c  

^a OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^c Écosystèmes Forestieres Et Paysages Cemagref ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Butterflies; Conservation; Distributions; France; Mapping; Recording

Indexed keywords

ATLAS; DATABASE; MAPPING; RECORD; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

FRANCE;

PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 0036883829     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00101-5     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife
2. Butterfly-hostplant fidelity, vagrancy and measuring mobility from distribution maps
3. Flight areas of British butterflies: Assessing species status and decline
4. Butterflies (Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) on islands in the Aegean archipelago: A correction, additions, an aid to identification and a cautionary tale
5. Targeting squares for recording: Predicting species richness and incidence of species for a butterfly atlas
6. Contemporary geography dominates butterfly diversity gradients within the Aegean archipelago (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea, Hesperioidea)
7. Bias in butterfly distribution maps: The influence of hot spots and access
8. Butterfly 'diversity'. Regressing and a little latitude
9. Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (north Belgium): Europe's worst case scenario
10. Lepidoptera Rhopalocera 44-85: 8ème Rapport Annuel (1999)
11. How marginal is the British butterfly fauna and what are the implications for research opportunities and conservation?
12. Butterfly metapopulations
13. Butterfly distribution patterns, processes and conservation