What does team teaching mean? a case study of interdisciplinary teaming

Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 96, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 67-77

  Murata, Roberta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Best practice; School reform; Teaming

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036860562     PISSN: 00220671     EISSN: 19400675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220670209598794     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Beane, J. A. (1990). A middle school curriculum: From rhetoric to reality. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association
2. Brandt, R. (1993). On outcome-based education: A conversation with Bill Spady. Educational Leadership, 50(4), 66-70
3. Brown, C. V. (1992). Contemporary poetry about painting. English Journal, 81(1), 41-t5
4. Cussler, E. B. (1989). Art in the literature class. English Journal, 78(3), 28-30
5. Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1992). Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles: Practical approaches for grades 3-6. Boston: Allyn & Bacon
6. Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching secondary students through their individual learning styles: Practical approaches for grades 7-12. Boston: Allyn & Bacon
7. Frana, B. S. (1998, April). High school culture and (mis)perceptions of support: A case study of success and failure for interdisciplinary team teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA
8. Fullan, M. G. (with S. Stiegelbauer) (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press
9. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books
10. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books
11. George, P. S. (1982). Interdisciplinary team organization: Four operational phases. Middle School Journal, 13(3), 10-13
12. Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill
13. Goswami, D., & Stillman, P. R. (1987). Reclaiming the classroom: Teacher research as an agency for change. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook
14. Hart, W. I. (1998). Interdisciplinary team teaching: Helping art lead educational reform. NASSP Bulletin, 82(591), 25-29
15. Hecht, J. B. (1994). Project Homeroom, Project Schoolroom, and regular school: Innovations in team teaching, interdisciplinary learning, and the use of technology. A final report on the project at the Maine East High School. Normal: Illinois State University, Technological Innovations in Educational Research Lab
16. Huberman, M. (1988). Teacher careers and school improvement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(2), 119-132
17. Huberman, M. (1991). Teacher development and instructional mastery. In A. Hargreaves & M. Fullan (Eds.), Understanding teacher development (pp. 122-142). London: Cassell
18. Ivins, W. H. (1964). Team teaching in the southwestern secondary school. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico, College of Education
19. Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
20. Jacobs, H. H. (1999). Breaking ground in high school integrated curriculum. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals
21. Lightfoot, S. L. (1983). The good high school: Portraits of character and culture. New York: Basic Books
22. Lyons, A. (1992). Interdisciplinarity: Giving up territory. College English, 54(6), 681-693
23. McCracken, N. M., & Sekicky, N. (1998). An invitation to success: Coteaching and learning in English 9G. English Journal, 88(1), 32-40
24. McNeese, T. (1989). Raiders of the lost art: Using the “painted word” in writing. English Journal, 78(3), 34-36
25. Miles, M. B. (1983). Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance: The problem of analysis. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Qualitative methodology (pp. 117-134). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
26. Mills, R. A., Powell, R. R., & Poliak, J. P. (1992). The influence of middle level interdisciplinary teaming on teacher isolation: A case study. Research in Middle Level Education 1992, 15(2), 9-25
27. Murata, R. (1997). Connecting the visual and verbal: English and art for high school sophomores. English Journal, 86(7), 44-48
28. Murata, R. (1998). Classroom innovation and school change: A curriculum ethnography of a 10th grade English-art class. Unpublished doc-toral dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
29. National Association of Secondary School Principals. (1997). Breaking ranks: Changing an Ame rican institution. Reston, VA: Author
30. Nelson, J. L., Palonsky, S. B., & Carlson, K. (2000). Critical issues in education. Boston: McGraw-Hill
31. O'Brien, L. (1989, October). Learning styles: Make the student aware. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 85-89
32. Oldfather, P., & Thomas, S. (1998). What does it mean when high school teachers participate in collaborative research with students on literacy motivations? Teachers College Record, 99(4), 647-691
33. Peterson, C. H. (1966). Effective team teaching: The Easton Area High School program. West Nyack, NY: Parker
34. Quality of Education Survey. (1993). Albuquerque Public Schools, Department of Research, Development, and Accountability. Albuquerque, NM: Albuquerque Public Schools
35. Reissman, R. C. (1994). Leaving out to pull in: Using reader response to teach multicultural literature. English Journal, 83(2), 20-23
36. Richards, M. (1987, Winter). A teacher's action research study: The “bums” of 8H. Peabody Journal of Education, 6(2), 65-79
37. Roberts, P. L., & Kellough, R. D. (2000). A guide for developing interdisciplinary thematic units. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
38. Roth, K. J. (1994). Second thoughts about interdisciplinary studies. American Educator AFT, 18(1), 44-48
39. Russell, R. (1992). Out of the silence: Developing teacher voice. In A. Gitlin, K. Bringhurst, M. Bums, V. Cooley, B. Myers, K. Price, et al., Teachers' voices for school change: An introduction to educative research (pp. 89-117). New York: Teachers College Press
40. Schlaadt, R. G. (1969). An analysis of the effectiveness of team teaching compared to traditional teaching of health to high school sophomore students. Research Quarterly AAHPER, 40(2), 364-367
41. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books
42. Sizer, T. (1992a). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
43. Sizer, T. (1992b). Horace's school: Redesigning the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
44. Spady, W. G. (1991). Shifting the grading paradigm that pervades education. Outcomes, 9(4), 39-45
45. Spady, W. G. (1992, Summer). It's time to take a close look at outcome-based education. Outcomes, 6-13
46. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
47. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Forth Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
48. Tchudi, S., & Lafer, S. (1996). The interdisciplinary teacher's handbook: Integrated teaching across the curriculum. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook
49. Tchudi, S., & Mitchell, D. (1999). Exploring and teaching the English language arts (4th ed.). New York: Longman
50. Trent, S. C. (1998). False starts and other dilemmas of a secondary general education collaborative teacher: A case study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(5), 503-513
51. Trivette, A. C., & White, K. (1969). Title III, Co-Op STEP: Statistical report showing the effect of individual instruction and team teaching upon the academic growth of high school students in English. Unpublished paper
52. Turner, S., & Handler, M. (1992). Data collector. Santa Barbara, CA: Intel-limation
53. Vars, G. F. (1969). Common learnings: Core and interdisciplinary team approaches. Scranton, PA: International Textbook
54. Veach, A. (1995). Academic teaming: Effort, empowerment lead to student success. The High School Magazine, 3(2), 24-28
55. Wiggins, G. (1989a, April). Teaching to the (authentic) test. Educational Leadership, 46(7), 41-47
56. Wiggins, G. (1989b, May). The true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70(9), 703-713
57. Wynne, E. A., & Walberg, H. J. (1995, November). The virtues of intimacy in education. Educational Leadership, 55(3), 53-54
58. Tin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
59. York, L. J. (1971). The background, philosophy, and purposes of team teaching. Dallas, TX: Leslie Press