Do college students participate more in discussion in traditional delivery courses or in interactive telecourses? A preliminary comparison

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 73, Issue 6, 2002, Pages

  Howard, Jay R ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036851409     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2002.11777180     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Astin, A.W. (1985). Achieving educational excellence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Auster, C.J., & MacRone, M. (1994). The classroom as a negotiated social setting: An empirical study of the effects of faculty members' behavior on students' participation. Teaching Sociology, 22, 289-300.
3. Blumenstyk, G. (1997, October 31). A feminist scholar questions how women fare in distance education. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A36.
4. Briner, P.M., Summers, M., Dean, R.S., Bink, M.L., Anderson, J.L., & Gelder, B.C. (1996). Student satisfaction with interactive telecourses as a function of demographic variables and prior telecourse experience. Distance Education, 17, 33-43.
5. Brookfield, S.D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Brooks, V. (1982). Sex differences in student dominance behavior in female and male professors' classrooms. Sex Roles, 7, 775-784.
7. Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
8. Cohen, P.A., Ebeling, B.J., & Kulik, J.A. (1981). A meta-analysis of outcome studies of visual-based instruction. Education Communication and Technology Journal, 29, 289-303.
9. Comeaux, P. (1995). The impact of an interactive distance learning network on classroom communication. Communication Education, 44, 353-361.
10. Constantinople, A., Cornelius, R., & Gray, J.M. (1988). The chilly climate: Fact or artifact? Journal of Higher Education, 59, 527-550.
11. Cornelius, R., Gray, J.M., & Constantinople, A.P. (1990). Student faculty interaction in the college classroom. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23, 189-197.
12. Council for Higher Education Accreditation. (2000). Distance learning in higher education. Update number 3. Washington, DC.
13. Crawford, M., & MacLeod, M. (1990). Gender in the college classroom: An assessment of the "chilly climate" for women. Sex Roles, 23, 101-122.
14. Fassinger, P.A. (1995). Understanding classroom interaction: Students' and professors' contributions to students' silence. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 82-96.
15. Fritschner, L.M. (2000). Inside the undergraduate college classroom: Faculty and students differ on the meaning of student participation. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 342-362.
16. Gallagher, P.A., & McCormick, K. (1999). Student satisfaction with two-way interactive distance learning for delivery of early childhood special education coursework. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14, 32-47.
17. Garside, C. (1996). Look who's talking: A comparison of lecture and group discussion teaching strategies in developing critical thinking skills. Communication Education, 45, 212-227.
18. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
19. Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
20. Horn, D. (1994). Distance education: Is interactivity compromised? Performance and instruction, 33(9), 12-15.
21. Howard, J.R., & Baird, R. (2000). The consolidation of responsibility and students' definitions of the college classroom. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 700-721.
22. Howard, J.R., & Henney, A.L. (1998). Student participation and instructor gender in the mixed-age college classroom. Journal of Higher Education, 69, 384-405.
23. Howard, J.R., Short, L.B., & Clark, S.M. (1996). Student participation in the mixedage college classroom, Teaching Sociology, 24, 8-24.
24. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K.A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
25. Jung, J., Moore, R.L., & Parker, J. (1999). A study of older students 'participation in the college classroom. Unpublished Manuscript.
26. Karp, D.A., & Yoels, W.C. (1976). The college classroom: Some observation on the meaning of student participation. Sociology and Social Research, 60, 421-439.
27. Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1994), Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 58-74.
28. McHenry, L., & Bozik, M. (1995). Communicating at a distance: A study of interaction in a distance education classroom. Communication Education, 44, 362-371.
29. McHugh, P. (1968). Defining the situation: The organization of meaning in social interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
30. McKeachie, W.J. (1990). Research on college teaching: The historical background. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 189-200.
31. Meyers, C., & Jones, T.B. (1993). Promoting active learning: Strategies for the college classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Moore, M.G., & Thompson, M.M. (1990). The effects of distance learning: A summary of the literature. The American Center for the Study of Distance Education, University Park, PA.
33. Nunn, C.E. (1996). Discussion in the college classroom: Triangulating observational and survey results. Journal of Higher Education, 67, 243-266.
34. Ogburn, W.F. (1964). On culture and social change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Pearson, J., & West, R. (1991). An initial investigation of the effects of gender on student questions in the classroom: Developing a descriptive base. Communication Education, 40, 22-32.
36. Ritchie, H. (1993). The effects of interaction mode on participation and interaction frequency during televised instruction with two-way audio. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 34, 218-227.
37. Smith, D.G. (1977). College classroom interactions and critical thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 180-190.
38. Spooner, F., Jordan, L. Algozzine, B., & Spooner, M. (1999). Student ratings of instruction in distance learning and on-campus classes. Journal of Education Research, 92, 132-140.
39. Steen, S., Bader, C., & Kubrin, C. (1999). Rethinking the graduate seminar. Teaching Sociology, 27, 167-173.
40. Sternglanz, S.H., & Lyberger-Ficek, S. (1977). Sex differences in student-teacher interactions in the college classroom. Sex Roles, 3, 345-352.
41. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1989). Linking for learning: A new course for education (OTA-SET-430). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
42. Wetzel, C.D., Radtke, P.H., & Stern, H.W. (1994). Instructional effectiveness of video media. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Wirt, J.G. (2000). The condition of education 2000. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.