Natural coordinate representation for the protein backbone structure

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 206-215

  Hunter, Cornelius G ^a   Subramaniam, Shankar ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Backbone; Continuous coordinates; Natural coordinates; Protein structure

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID ANALYSIS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR MODEL; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

AMINO ACIDS; ANIMALS; CARBON; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 0036836604     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10201     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Creighton TE. Proteins: structures and molecular properties, 2nd ed. New York: W. H. Freeman; 1993.
2. Samudrala R, Moult J. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1998;275:895-916.
3. Rojnuckarin A, Subramaniam S. Knowledge-based Interaction potentials for proteins. Proteins 1999;36:54-67.
4. Ozkan B, Bahar I. Recognition of native structure from complete enumeration of low-resolution models with constraints. Proteins 1998;32:211-222.
5. Hinds DA, Levitt M. Exploring conformational space with a simple lattice model for protein structure. J Mol Biol 1994;243:668-682.
6. Nymeyer H, Garcia AE, Onuchic JN. Folding funnels and.frustration in off-lattice minimalist protein structures. PNAS 1998;95: 5921-5928.
7. Mohanty D, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. De novo simulations of the folding thermodynamics of the gcn4 leucine zipper. Biophys J 1999;77:54-69.
8. Rojnuckarin A, Kim S, Subramaniam S. Brownian dynamics simulations of protein folding: access to milliseconds time scale and beyond. PNAS 1998;95:4288-4292.
9. Kazmirski SL, Li A, Daggett V. Analysis methods for comparison of multiple md trajectories: applications to protein unfolding pathways and denatured ensembles. J Mol Biol 1999;290:283-304.
10. Leopold PE, Montal M, Onuchic JN. Protein folding funnels: a kinetic approach to the sequence-structure relationship. PNAS 1992;89:8721-8725.
11. Goldstein RA, Luthey-Schulten ZA, Wolynes PG. Protein tertiary structure recognition using optimized hamiltonians with local interactions. PNAS 1992;89:9029-9033.
12. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997;268:209-225.
13. Eyrich VA, Standley DM, Felts AK, Friesner RA. Protein tertiary structure prediction using a branch and bound algorith. Proteins 1999;35:41-57.
14. Liwo A, Lee J, Ripoll DR, Pillardy J, Scheraga HA. Protein structure prediction by global optimization of a potential energy function. PNAS 1999;96:5482-5485.
15. Branden C, Tooze J. Introduction to protein structure, 2nd ed. New York: Garland; 1991.
16. Sippl MJ. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. J Mol Biol 1990;213:859-883.
17. Feig M, Rotkiewicz P, Kolinski A, Skolnick J, Brooks CL. Accurate reconstruction of all-atom protein representations from side-chain-based low-resolution models. Proteins 2000;41:86-97.
18. Sun S. Reduced representation approach to protein tertiary structure prediction: statistical potential and simulated annealing. J Theor Biol 1995;172:13-32.
19. Sali A, Shakhnovich E, Karplus M. Kinetics of protein folding. J Mol Biol 1994;235:1614-1636.
20. Pande VS, Rokhsar DS. Folding pathway of a lattice model for proteins. PNAS 1999;96:1273-1278.
21. Wilson C, Doniach S. A computer model to dynamically simulate protein folding: studies with crambin. Proteins 1989;6:193-209.
22. Geetha V, Munson PJ. Simplified representation of proteins. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1996;13:781-793.
23. Park K, Vendruscolo M, Domany E. Toward an energy function for the contact map representation of proteins. Proteins 2000;40:237-248.
24. Park BH, Levitt M. The complexity and accuracy of discrete state models of protein structure. J Mol Biol 1995;249:493-507.
25. Ramachandran GN, Sasisekharan V. Conformation of polypeptides and proteins. Adv Protein Chem 1968;23:283-437.
26. Brant DA, Flory PJ. The configuration of random polypeptide chains II: theory. J Am Chem Soc 1965;81:2791:2800.
27. Srinivasan R, Balasubramanian R, Rajan SS. Some new methods and general results of analysis of protein crystallographic structural data. J Mol Biol 1975;98:739:747.
28. Oldfield TJ, Hubbard RE. Analysis of Cα geometry in protein structures. Proteins 1994;18:324-337.
29. DeWitte RS, Shakhnovich EI. Pseudodihedrals: simplified protein backbone representation with knowledge-based energy. Protein Sci 1994;3:1570-1581.
30. Nash JC. Compact numerical methods for computers: linear algebra and function minimisation. New York: Halsted Press, 1979.
31. Rooman MJ, Rodriguez J, Wodak SJ. Automatic definition of recurrent local structure mofits in proteins. J Mol Biol 1990;213: 327-336.
32. Levitt M. Accurate modeling of protein conformation by automatic segment matching. J Mol Biol 1992;226:507-533.
33. Dewey TG. Algorithmic complexity and thermodynamics of sequence-structure relationships in proteins. Phys Rev E 1997;56: 4545-4552.
34. Godzik A. The structural alignment between two proteins: is there a unique answer? Prot Sci 1996;5:1325-1338.
35. Gerstein M, Levitt M. Comprehensive assessment of automatic structural alignment against a manual standard, the SCOP classification of proteins. Prot Sci 1998;7:445-456.
36. Cohen GH. ALIGN: a program to superimpose protein coordinates, accounting for insertions and deletions. J Appl Cryst 1997;30:1160-1161.
37. Gibrat J, Madeg T, Bryant SH. Surprising similarities in structure comparison. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:377-385.
38. Yang A, Honig B. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. I. Protein structural alignment and a quantitative measure for protein structural distance. J Mol Biol 2000;301:665-678.
39. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM. Significance of root-mean-square deviation in comparing three-dimensional structures of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1994;235:625-634.
40. Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Prot Eng 1998;9:739-747.
41. http://www.cmpharm.ucsf.edu/~nomi/nnpredict.html
42. Kneller DG, Cohen FE, Langridge R. Improvements in protein secondary structure prediction by an enhanced neural network. J Mol Biol 1990;214:171-182.