Faculty practice: What do the data show? Findings from the NONPF Faculty Practice Survey

Nursing Outlook

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 238-246

  Pohl, Joanne M ^a   Duderstadt, Karen ^b   Tolve Schoeneberger, Candice ^c   Uphold, Constance R ^d   Hartig, Margaret Thorman ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c REGIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d S GA Veterans Health System   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTINUING EDUCATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; NURSING EDUCATION; ORGANIZATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTION; REVIEW; TEACHER; ARTICLE; CAREER MOBILITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NURSE PRACTITIONER; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; WORK;

CAREER MOBILITY; DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATION, NURSING; FACULTY, NURSING; HUMANS; JOB DESCRIPTION; NURSE PRACTITIONERS; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE;

EID: 0036831694     PISSN: 00296554     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mno.2002.128879     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Burns CE. Faculty clinical practice as a tenurable activity. In Marion L, ed. Faculty practice: applying the models. Washington, DC: National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties; 1997. p. 41-48.
2. Sawyer MJ, et al. A critical review of current nursing faculty practice. J Am Acad Nurse Practitioners 2000;12:511-16.
3. Sherwen LN. When the mission is teaching: does nursing faculty practice fit? J Prof Nurs 1998;14:137-43.
4. Starck PL. Hallmarks of scholarly practice: distinguishing features and guiding principles. In Hallmarks of Scholarly Nursing Practice. Proceedings of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing 1999 Faculty Practice Conference; 1999.
5. Marion L. National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties guidelines for evaluation of faculty practice. In: Marion L, ed. Faculty practice: applying the models. Washington, DC: National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties; 1997. p. 9-10.
6. Taylor D. Faculty practice: the next steps. In: Marion L, ed. Faculty practice: applying the models, Washington, DC: National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties; 1997. p. 3-7.
7. Pohl JM, et al. NONPF faculty practice guidelines. Washington, DC: National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties. 2000.
8. Boyer E. Scholarship reconsidered: priorities for the professorate. Princeton (NJ): The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1990.
9. Glassick C. Scholarship assessed: a special report on faculty evaluation. In Hallmarks of scholarly nursing practice. Proceedings of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing's 1999 Faculty Practice Conference; Washington, DC; 1999.
10. Barchi RL, Lowery BJ. Scholarship in the medical faculty from the university perspective: retaining academic values. Academic Med 2000;75:899-905.
11. Aday LA, Quill BE. A framework for assessing practice-oriented scholarship in schools of public health. J Public Health Management Pract 2000;6:38-46.
12. Steckler A, Dodd J. Changing promotion and tenure guidelines to include practice: one public health school's experience. J Public Health Management Pract 1998;6:114-19.
13. Beattie DS. Expanding the view of scholarship: introduction. Academic Med 2000;75:871-976.
14. Marks ES. Defining scholarship at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences School of Medicine: a study in cultures. Academic Med 2000;75:935-9.
15. Nora LM, et al. Revising appointment, promotion, and tenure procedures to incorporate an expanded definition of scholarship: the University of Kentucky College of Medicine experience. Academic Med 2000;75:913-24.
16. Adam BE, Roberts AO. Differences among the disciplines, in recognizing faculty work: reward systems for the year 2000. Diamond RM, Adam BE, eds. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1993. p. 23-62.
17. Jacobs MB. Faculty status for clinician-educators: guidelines for evaluation and promotion. Academic Med 1993;68:126-8.
18. Edwards J, Alichnie C, Easley CE, Edwardson S, Keating SB, Stanley J. Position statement: defining scholarship for the discipline of nursing. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 1999.
19. Tolve CJ. Nursing scholarship: role of faculty practice. Clin Excel Nurse Practitioner 1999;3:28-33.
20. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. A classification of institutions of higher education. Lawrenceville (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1994.
21. Menard S. Applied logistic regression analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995.
22. The National Task Force on Quality NP Education. Criteria for evaluation of nurse practitioner programs. Washington: National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties; 1997.
23. Vincent D, et al. A tale of two nursing centers: a cautionary study of profitability. Nurs Econ 1999;17:257-62.
24. Diamond RM. Recognizing faculty work: reward systems for the year 2000. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1993.
25. Brown MA. Academic faculty practice: enrichment through synergism. Appl Nurs Res 2001;14:56-61.
26. Jones RF, Sanderson SC. Tenure policies in the US and Canadian medical schools. Academic Med 1994;69:772-8.
27. Van Alstyne W. Tenure: a summary, explanation, and "defense." American Association of University Professors Bulletin 1971;57:328-9.