Inside the peer review process: How academics review a colleague's teaching portfolio

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 1035-1049

  Quinlan, Kathleen M ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive processes; Course evaluation; Evaluation methods; Faculty evaluation; Problem solving; Protocol analysis; Scholarly communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036830387     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00058-6     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
2. Centra, J. (2000). Evaluating the teaching portfolio: A role for colleagues. In K. E. Ryan (Ed.), Evaluating teaching in higher education: A vision for the future. New directions for teaching and learning, Vol. 83 (pp. 87-94). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Cerbin, W. (1994). The course portfolio as a tool for continuous improvement of teaching and learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 5, 95-105.
4. Cerbin, W. (1996). Inventing a new genre: The course portfolio at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse. In P. Hutchings (Ed.), Making teaching community property. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
5. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
6. Cosser, M. (1998). Towards the design of a system of peer review of teaching for the advancement of the individual within the university. Higher Education, 35, 143-162.
7. Dwyer, C. A., & Stufflebeam, D. (1996). Teacher evaluation. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 765-786). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
8. Edgerton, R., Hutchings, P., & Quinlan, K. (1991). Teaching portfolio: Capturing the scholarship in teaching. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
9. Elstein, A., Shulman, L. S., & Sprafka, S. A. (1978). Medical problem solving: An analysis of clinical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Elstein, A., Shulman, L. S., & Sprafka, S. A. (1990). Medical problem solving: A ten year retrospective. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 13(1), 5-36.
11. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215-251.
12. Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers for the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
13. Hutchings, P. (1996). Making teaching community property: A menu for peer collaboration and peer review. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
14. Hutchings, P. (1998). The course portfolio: How faculty can examine their teaching to advance practice and improve student learning. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
15. Leinhardt, G., Beck, I. L., & Stainton, C. (Eds.) (1994). Teaching and learning in history. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Leinhardt, G., & Young, K. M. (1996). Two texts, three readers: Distance and expertise in reading history. Cognition and Instruction, 14(4), 441-486.
17. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 13-17.
18. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231-259.
19. Ochs, E., Gonzales, P., & Jacoby, S. (1993). "When I come down I'm in the domain state": Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists. TESL & Applied Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles.
20. Ory, J. C. (2000). Teaching evaluation: Past, present, and future. In K. E. Ryan (Ed.), Evaluating teaching in higher education: A vision for the future. New directions for teaching and learning, Vol. 83 (pp. 13-18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Palmer, B. H. (1995). Lesjes van de Nederlanders: Little lessons from the Dutch to promote educational quality. Concord, MA: American Institute of Research.
22. Ramsden, P., Margetson, D., Martin, E., & Clarke, S. (1995). Recognising and rewarding good teaching in Australian Universities. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.
23. Rowe, H. A. (1985). Problem solving and intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Seldin, P. (1991). The teaching portfolio: A practical guide to improved performance and promotion/tenure decisions. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
25. Seldin, P. (1999). Changing practices in evaluating teaching: A practical guide to improved faculty performance and promotion/tenure decisions. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
26. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
27. Shulman, L. S. (1992). Toward a pedagogy of cases. In J. H. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education (pp. 1-30). New York: Teachers College Press.
28. Trow, M., & Clark, P. (1994). Managerialism and the academic profession: Quality and control (Higher Education Report 2). London: Quality Support Centre, Open University.
29. Valimaa, J. (1994). Academics on assessment and peer review-Finnish experience. Higher Education Management, 6(3), 391-408.
30. Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73-87.
31. Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Applied social research methods series, Vol. 5. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.