Teacher evaluation

Handbook of Educational Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 765-786

  Dwyer, Carol Anne ^a   Stufflebeam, Daniel ^b  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

^b WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85084880030     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203053874-32     Document Type: Chapter

References (154)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing Washington, DC: American Educational Association.
2. American Psychological Association, Division of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (1980). Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: Author.
3. Andrews, H. A. (1985). Evaluating for excellence: Addressing the need for responsible and effective faculty evaluation Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
4. Angoff, W. H. (1971). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed., pp. 508-600). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
5. Barr, A. (1950). Teaching competencies. In W. Monroe (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (rev. ed.), pp. 1446-1454. New York: Macmillan.
6. Berk, R. A. (1988). Fifty reasons why student achievement gain does not mean teacher effectiveness. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 345-363.
7. Berliner, D. C. (1989). Implications of studies of expertise in pedagogy for teacher education and evaluation. In New directions for teacher assessment: Proceedings of the 1988 ETS Invitational Conference(pp. 39-68). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
8. Berliner, D. C. (1990). The place of process-product research in developing the agenda for research on teacher thinking. Educational Psychologist, 24, 325-344.
9. Bird, T. (1990). The schoolteacher’s portfolio: An essay on possibilities. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The neiv handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 241-256). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Bridges, F- (1986). The incompetent teacher: The challenge and the response Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
11. Brookover, W. B. (1979). School social systems and student achievement: Schools can make a difference New York: Praeger.
12. Brophy, J., & Evertson, C. (1978). Context variables in teaching. Educational Psychologist, 12, 310-316.
13. Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1988). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
14. Burry, J. A. (1990). Multiple methods of data collection for beginning teacher assessment. In Compendium of papers presented at the statewide Colloquium on Instructional Personnel Tallahassee: Florida State Department of Education.
15. Burry, J. A., Chissom, B. S., & Shaw, D. G. (1990, March). Validity and reliability of classroom observations: A paradox Paper presented at a meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Boston.
16. Burry, J. A., & Shaw, D. G. (1988). Teachers and administrators differ in assessing teacher effectiveness. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2, 33-41.
17. California Commission on the Teaching Profession. (1985). Who will teach our children? A strategy for improving California's schools. Sacramento, CA: California Commission on the Teaching Profession.
18. Chance, W. (1987). Reforming America’s public schools in the 1980s. Chicago: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
19. Coker, H., Medley, D., & Soar, R. (1980). How valid are expert opinions about effective teaching? Phi Delta Kappa, 62, 131-134.
20. Coleman, J. A., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21. Coley, R. J., & Goertz, M. E. (1991). Characteristics of minority NTE test-takers (Teacher Programs Council Research Report Series No. 91-1). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
22. Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed., pp. 150-189). New York: Harper Collins.
23. Darling-Hammond, L. (1986). A proposal for evaluating in the teaching profession. Elementary School Journal, 86, 531-569.
24. Darling-Hammond, L., & Berry, B. (1988). The evolution of teacher policy Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
25. Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A. E., & Pease, S. R. (1983). Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 53, 285-328.
26. Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of crisis Cambridge: MIT Press.
27. Dill, D. D. (Ed.). (1990). What teachers need to know: The knowledge, skills, and values essential to good teaching San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Duke, D. L., & Stiggias, R. J. (1990). Beyond minimum competence: Evaluation for professional development. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 116-132). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Dunkin, M. J., & Biddle, B. J. (1974). The study of teaching New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
30. Dwyer, C. A. (1989). A new generation of tests for licensing beginning teachers. In New directions for teacher assessment: Proceedings of the 1988 ETS Invitational Conference (pp. 29-37). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
31. Dwyer, C. A. (1991). Measurement and research issues in teacher assessment. Educational Psychologist, 26, 3-22.
32. Dwyer, C. A. (1993a). Development of the knowledge base for the Praxis III: Classroom Performance Assessments assessment criteria Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
33. Dwyer, C. A. (1993b). Innovation and reform: Examples from teacher assessment. In R. E. Bennett & W. C. Ward (Eds.), Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement (pp. 265-289). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Dwyer, C. A. (1993c). Teaching and diversity: Meeting the challenges for innovative teacher assessments. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(2), 119-129.
35. Dwyer, C. A., & Villegas, A. M. (1993). Guiding conceptions and assessment principles for “The Praxis Series: Professional Assessments for Beginning Teachers.” Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
36. Educational Testing Service. (1989). Validity: Using NTE tests. Princeton, NJ.
37. Educational Testing Service. (1990). The educational reform decade. Princeton, NJ: Author (Policy Information Center).
38. Educational Testing Service. (1991). CHART Princeton, NJ.
39. Educational Testing Service. (1992). Guidelines for proper use of “The Praxis Series: Professional Assessments for Beginning Teachers.” Princeton, NJ.
40. Educational Testing Service. (1993). Validity: Q&A Princeton, NJ.
41. Evertson, C, & Burry, J. (1989). Capturing classroom context: The observation system as a lens for assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2, 297-320.
42. Evertson, C., & Green, J. (1986). Observation as method and inquiry. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 162-213). New York: Macmillan.
43. Fischer, L., Schimmel, D., & Kelly, C. (1991). Teachers and the law(5td ed.). New York: Longman.
44. Flanders, N. (1970). Analyzing teacher behavior Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
45. Frederiksen, J. R., & Collins, A. (1989). A systems approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher, 18(9), 27-32.
46. French, R. L., Holdzkom, D., & Kuligowski, B. (1990). Teacher evaluation in SREB states (Stage 1) Unpublished manuscript, Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.
47. Garcia, P. A. (1985). A study of teacher competency testing and tests validity with implications for minorities: Final report. (NIE Grant No. NIE-G-85-0004). Edinburgh, TX: Pan American University.
48. Georgia Association of Educators v. Nix, 407 F. Supp. 1102 (N.D. Ga. 1976).
49. Ghorpade, J., & Atchison, T. J. (1980, Fall). The concept of job analysis: A review and some suggestions. Public Personnel Management Journal, 134-144.
50. Glass, G. V (1990). Using student test scores to evaluate teachers. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 191-215). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51. Good, T. L., & Mulryan, C. (1990). Teacher ratings: A call for teacher control and self-evaluation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 191-215). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
52. Goodman, J. (1988). The political tactics and teaching strategies of reflective, active preservice teachers. Elementary School Journal, 89, 23-41.
53. Green, J., & Harker, J. (1987). Multiple perspective analysis of classroom discourse Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
54. Haertel, E. (1986). The valid use of student performance measures for teacher evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 8, 45-60.
55. Haertel, E. (1990). Performance tests, simulations, and other methods. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 278-294). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
56. Hambleton, R. K. (1990). Boston, MA: Presidential address at the National Council on Measurement in Education.
57. Haney, W., Madaus, G., & Kreitzer, A. (1987). Charms talismanic: Testing teachers for the improvement of American education. In E. Z. Roth-kopf (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 14, pp. 169-238). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
58. Herbert, J., & McNergney, R. (1989). Evaluating teacher evaluators using a set of public standards. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2, 321-334.
59. Holmes Group. (1990). Tomorrow's schools: Principles for the design of professional development schools East Lansing, MI: Author.
60. Hood, S., & Parker, L. (1989). Minority bias review panels and teacher testing for initial certification: A comparison of two states’ results. Journal of Negro Education, 58, 511-519.
61. Hood, S., & Parker, L. (1991). Minorities, teacher testing, and recent U.S. Supreme Court holdings: A regressive step. Teachers College Record,92, 603-618.
62. Howey, K. R., & Zimpher, N. L. (1989) Pre-service teacher educators’ role in programs for beginning teachers. Elementary School Journal, 89, 451-470.
63. Howey, K. R., & Zimpher, N. L. (1990). Profiles of preservice teacher education: Inquiry into the nature of programs Albany: State University of New York Press.
64. Hunter, M. (1988a). Create rather than await your fate in teacher evaluation. In S. Stanley & W. J. Popham (Eds.), Teacher evaluation. Six prescriptions for success (pp. 32-54). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
65. Hunter, M. (1988b). Effecting a reconciliation between supervision and evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 275-279.
66. Iwanicki, E. F. (1981). Contract plans: A professional growth-oriented approach to evaluating teacher performance. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 203-228). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
67. Jencks, C. (1972). Inequality’: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America New York: Basic Books.
68. Johnson, S. (1980). Performance based staff lay-offs in the public schools: Implementation and outcomes. Harvard Education Review, 50, 214-233.
69. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1981). Standards for evaluations of educational programs, projects, and materials New York: McGraw-Hill.
70. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1988). The personnel evaluation standards Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
71. Joyce, B., & McKibbin, M. (1982). Teacher growth states and school environments. Educational Leadership, 47, 10-77.
72. Kagan, D. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks principle. Review of Educational Research, 60, 419-469.
73. Kaplan, A. (1963). The conduct of inquiry San Francisco: Chandler.
74. Kelly, J. (1989). Strengthening the teaching profession through national certification. New Directions for Teacher Assessment: Proceedings of the 1988 ETS Invitational Conference (pp. 1-11). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
75. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563-575.
76. Lehman, I. J., & Phillips, S. E. (1987). A survey of state teacher-compe-tency examination programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 6(1), 14-18.
77. Linn, R., Buchmann, M., Gould, B., Kellaghan, T., Lawrence, D., Robinson, P., & Zirkel, P. (1989). The development, validation, and applicability of The Personnel Evaluation Standards. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2, 199-214.
78. Livingston, S. A., & Zieky, M. J. (1982). Passing scores: A manual for setting standards of performance on educational and occupational tests Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
79. Madaus, G. F. (1990). Legal and professional issues in teacher certification testing: A psychometric snark hunt In J. V. Mitchell, S. L. Wise, and B. S. Plake (Eds.), Assessment of teaching: Purposes, practices, and implications for the Profession (pp. 209-259). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
80. Madaus, G. F., & Pullin, D. (1987, September). Teacher certification tests: Do they really measure what we need to know? Phi Delta Kappa, 69(1), 31-38.
81. Manatt, R. P. (1988). Teacher performance evaluation: A total systems approach. In S.J. Stanley& W.J. Popham (Eds.), Teacher evaluation: Six prescriptions for success(pp. 79-108). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
82. Manatt, R. P., & Stow, S. (1984). The clinical manual for teacher performance evaluation Ames: Iowa State University Research Foundation.
83. McDonald, F. (1976). Report on Phase II of the Beginning Teacher Evaluation Study. Journal of Teacher Education, 27(1), 39-42.
84. McDonald, F., & Elias, P. (1976). The effects of teaching performance on pupil learning: Beginning Teacher Evaluation Study, Phase II, 1974-76. Final report (5 vols.). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
85. McDonough, M. W., & Wolfe, W. C., Jr. (1988). Court actions which helped define the direction of the competency-based testing movement. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 21, 37-43.
86. McGreal, T. (1983). Successful teacher evaluation Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
87. McKenna, B. H. (1973). A context for teacher evaluation. National Elementary Principal, 52, 18-23.
88. McKenna, B. H. (1981). Context/environment effects in teacher evaluation. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 23-37). Beverly Hills, Ca: Sage.
89. Medley, D. M., Coker, H., & Soar, R. S. (1984). Measurement-based evaluation of teacher performance: An empirical approach New York: Longman.
90. Mehrens, W. A. (1991). Social issues in teacher testing. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4, 317-319.
91. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York: Macmillan.
92. Millman, J. (1981a). Handbook of teacher evaluation Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
93. Millman, J. (1981b). Student achievement as a measure of teacher competence. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 146-166). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
94. Millman, J. (1989). If at first you don’t succeed: Setting passing scores when more than one attempt is permitted. Educational Researcher, 18(6), 5-9.
95. Milner, J. O. (1991). Suppositional style and teacher evaluation. Phi Delta Kappa, 72, 464-467.
96. National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification. (1991). Manual on certification and preparation of education personnel in the United States Seattle, WA: Author.
97. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
98. Osborne, W. D., & Wiggins, T. (1989). Perceptions of tasks in the school.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2, 567-576.
99. Popham, W. J. (1987). The shortcomings of champagne teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7(1), 25-28.
100. Popham, W. J. (1991, June). Judging the content of teacher licensure tests: How good is good enough? Preliminary draft presented at the annual conference of National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification, Bellevue, WA.
101. Popham, W. J., & Kirby, W. N. (1987). Recertification tests for teachers: A defensible safeguard for society. Phi Delta Kappa, 69, 45-48.
102. Rebell, M. A. (1986). Disparate impact of teacher competency testing on minorities: Don’t blame the test takers-or the tests. Yale Law and Policy Review, 4, 375-403.
103. Rebell, M. A. (1988). Legal issues concerning bias in testing. In R. Allan, P. Nassif, & M. Elliot (Eds.), Bias issues in teacher certification issues(pp. 59-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
104. Rebell, M. A. (1989). Testing, public policy and the courts. In B. R. Gifford (Ed.), Testing and the allocation of opportunity Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
105. Rebell, M. A. (1990). Legal issues concerning teacher evaluation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 337-355). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
106. Redfem, G. B. (1963). How to appraise teaching performance Columbus, OH: School Management Institute.
107. Redfem, G. B. (1980). Evaluating teachers and administrators: A performance objectives approach Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
108. Reineke, R., Willeke, M., Walsh, L., & Sawin, C. (1988). Review of personnel evaluation systems: A local application of the Standards. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 373-378.
109. Reynolds, M. C. (1989). Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
110. Richardson, V. (1990). The evolution of reflective teaching and teacher education. In R. T. Clift, W. R. Houston, & M. C. Pugach (Eds.), Encouraging reflective practice in education (pp. 3-19). New York: Teachers College Press.
111. Rosenfeld, M., Freeberg, N. E., & Bukatko, P. (1992). The professional functions of secondary school teachers Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
112. Rosenfeld, M., Reynolds, A., & Bukatko, P. (1992). The professional functions of elementary school teachers Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
113. Rosenfeld, M., & Tannenbaum, R. T. (1991). Identification of a core of important enabling skills for the NTE Successor Stage I examination (RR-91-37). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
114. Rosenfeld, M., Thornton, R. F., & Skumik, L. S. (1986). Analysis of the professional function of teachers: Relationships between job functions and the NTE core battery (Report No. 86-8). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
115. Rosenfeld, M., Wilder, G., & Bukatko, P. (1992). 77?e professional functions of middle school teachers Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
116. Rudner, L. M. (1988). Teacher testing: An update. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 7(1), 16-19.
117. Ryans, D. G. (1960). Characteristics of teachers Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
118. Sanders, W. L., &McLean, R. A. (1984). Objective component of teacher evaluation—a feasibility study Knoxville: University of Tennessee, College of Business Administration Working Paper Series.
119. Saydel Education Association v. PERB, 333 N.W. 26486, Iowa (1983).
120. Schmitt, N., & Doherty, M. (1988). NASSP study of measurement and model linkage issues for the comprehensive assessment of school environments. Unpublished technical report (available from NASSP), East Lansing: Michigan State University.
121. Scriven, M. (1987). Validity in personnel evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 9-23.
122. Scriven, M. (1988a). Duties-based teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 319-334.
123. Scriven, M. (1988b). Evaluating teachers as professionals.- The duties-based approach. In S. J. Stanley & W. J. Popham (Eds.), Teacher evaluation: Six prescriptions for success (pp. 110-142). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
124. Scriven, M. (1990). Teacher selection. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds), The new handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 76-103). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
125. Scriven, M. (1991). Teacher evaluation models(J1LMP memos, Teacher Evaluation Models Project). Kalamazoo, MI: Center for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation.
126. Shalock, D., & Shalock, M. (1990, September). Extending teacher assessment beyond knowledge and skills: An emerging focus on teacher accomplishments. Issues and Practices in Performance Assessment, 2, 81-126.
127. Shavelson, R. J., Webb, N., & Burstein, L. (1986). Measurement of teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching(3rd ed., pp. 50-91). New York: Macmillan.
128. Shavelson, R. J. (1988). Contributions of educational research to policy and practice: Constructing, challenging, changing cognition. Educational Researcher, 1(7), 4-11, 22.
129. Shepard, L. A., & Kreitzer, A. E. (1987). The Texas Teacher Test. Educational Researcher, 16(6), 22-31.
130. Shimberg, B. (1985). Testing for licensure and certification. American Psychologist, 36, 1138-1146.
131. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
132. Shulman, L. S. (1987a). Assessment for teaching: An initiative for the profession. Phi Delta Kappa, 69, 38-44.
133. Shulman, L. S. (1987b). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
134. Shulman, L. S. (1988). A union of insufficiencies: Strategies for teacher assessment in a period of educational reform. Educational Leadership, 46, 36-41.
135. Shulman, L. S. (1989). The paradox of teacher assessment. In New directions for teacher assessment: Proceedings of the 1988 ETS Invitational Conference (pp. 13-27). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
136. Shulman, L. S., Bird, T., & Haertel, E. (1988). Toward alternative assessments of teaching: A report of use in progress Stanford, CA: Stanford University School of Education, Teacher Assessment Project.
137. Sprinthall, N. A., & Thies-Sprinthall, L. (1983). The teacher as an adult learner: A cognitive-developmental view. In G. Griffin (Ed.), Staff development. 82nd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II, (pp. 13-35). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
138. St. Louis Teachers Union, Local 420 v. Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, 652 F. Supp. 425 (E.D. Mo. 1987).
139. Stodolsky, S. S. (1988). The subject matters Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
140. Streifer, P., & Iwanicki, E. (1987). The validation of beginning teacher competencies in Connecticut. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 33-55.
141. Strike, K., &Bull, B. (1981). Fairness and the legal context of teacher evaluation. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
142. Stufflebeam, D. L. (1990). Research and development center on teacher performance evaluation and educational accountability Technical proposal submitted to the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University Evaluation Center.
143. Task Force on Teaching as a Profession. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century New York: Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.
144. Texas State Teachers Association v. State of Texas, 711 SW. 2nd 421 (Texas 1986).
145. Tittle, C. K. (1989). Validity: Whose construction is it in the teaching and learning context? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8, 5-13, 34.
146. Travers, R. M. W. (1981). Criteria of good teaching. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 14-22). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
147. United States v. South Carolina, 445 F. Supp. 1094 (D.S.C. 1977), aff’d 434 U.S. 1026 (1978).
148. Villegas, A. M. (1991). Culturally responsive teaching Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
149. Walston v. County School Board of Nansemond County, 492 F. 2d 919 (4th Cir. 1973).
150. Webster, W. J., Mendro, R. L., & Almaguer, T. O. (1993). Effectiveness indices: The major comportent of an equitable accountability system Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
151. Wilder, G. Z., & Ashare, C. J. (1990). A study of mentoring programs: Phase 2 Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
152. Wise, A. E., Darling-Hammond, L., McLaughlin, M. W., & Bernstein, H. T. (1984a). Case studiesfor teacher evaluation: A study of effective practices Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
153. Wise, A. F.., Darling-Hammond, L., McLaughlin, M. W., & Bernstein, H. T. (1984b). Teacher evaluation: A study of effective practices. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
154. Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.). (1986). Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.