The phylogeny and behaviour of cervidae (ruminantia pecora)

Ethology Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 199-216

  Cap, H ^a   Aulagnier, S ^b   Deleporte, P ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Ancestral ethotype; Behavioural repertoire; Cervidae; Phylogeny; Systematics

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY; UNGULATE;

ALCES; ANTILOCAPRIDAE; BOVIDAE; CAPREOLINAE; CAPREOLUS; CERVIDAE; CERVINAE; CERVOIDEA; CERVUS; CERVUS DAMA; DAMA; GIRAFFIDAE; HYDROPOTES; HYDROPOTINAE; MOSCHIDAE; MUNTIACUS; ODOCOILEUS; PECORA; RANGIFER; RUMINANTIA; UNGULATA;

EID: 0036816693     PISSN: 03949370     EISSN: 18287131     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2002.9522740     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Altmann J. 1974. Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227-267.
2. Alvarez F., Braza F. & Norzagaray A. 1975. Ethograma cuantificado del gamo (Dama dama) en libertad. Doñana, Acta Vertebrata 2 (1): 93-142.
3. Alvarez F., Braza F. & Norzagaray A. 1976. The use of the rump patch in the fallow deer (Dama dama). Behaviour 56: 298-308.
4. Barrette C. 1977. Fighting behaviour of muntjac and the evolution of antlers. Evolution 31: 169-176.
5. Barrette C. 1987. The comparative ecology and behaviour of chevrotains, musk deer, and morphologically conservative deer, In: Wemmer C.M., Edit. The biology and management of the Cervidae. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 200-213.
6. Bouvrain G., Geraads D. & Jehenne Y. 1989. Nouvelles données relatives à la classification des Cervidae (Artiodactyla, Mammalia). Zoologische Anzeiger 223: 82-90.
7. Brooke V. 1878. On the classification of the Cervidae, with a synopsis of the existing species. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London: 833-928.
8. Bubenik A.B. 1982. Taxonomy of Pecora in relation to morphophysiology of their cranial appendages, In: Brown R.D., Edit. Antler development in Cervidae. Kingsville: Caesar Klebert Wildlife Research Institute, pp. 163-186.
9. Campan R. 1980. L’animal et son univers, étude dynamique du comportement. Toulouse: Privat.
10. Campan R. & Scapini F. 2001. Éthologie, approche systémique du comportement. Paris, Bruxelles: DeBoeck Université.
11. Carpenter J.M. 1988. Choosing among multiple equally parsimonious cladograms. Cladistics 4: 291-296.
12. Clutton-Brock T.H. 1987. Sexual selection in Cervidae, In: Wemmer C.M., Edit. The biology and management of the Cervidae. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 110-122.
13. Clutton-Brock T.H., Guinness F.E. & Albon S.D. 1982. Red deer: behaviour and ecology of two sexes. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
14. Colbert E.H. 1941. The osteology and relationships of Archaeomeryx, an ancestral ruminant. American Museum Novitates 1135: 1-24.
15. Comincini S., Sironi M., Bandi C., Giunta C., Rubini M. & Fontana F. 1996. RAPD analysis of systematic relationships among the Cervidae. Heredity 76: 215-221.
16. Darwin C. 1859. On the origin of species. London: John Murray.
17. De Beer G. 1954. Archaeopteryx lithographica. London: British Museum Natural History.
18. Deleporte P. 1993. Characters, attributes and tests of evolutionary scenarios. Cladistics 9: 427-432.
19. De Queiroz K. & Wimberger P.H. 1993. The useful of behavior for phylogeny estimation: levels of homoplasy in behavioral and morphological characters. Evolution 47: 46-60.
20. Douzery E. & Randi E. 1997. The mitochondrial control region of Cervidae: evolutionary patterns and phylogenetic content. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 1154-1166.
21. Dubost G. 1971. Observations éthologiques sur le Muntjak (Muntiacus muntjak Zimmermann, 1780 et M. reevesi Ogilby, 1839) en captivité et semi-liberté. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 28: 387-427.
22. Espmark Y. 1969. Mother-young relations and development of behaviour in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Viltrevy 6: 461-540.
23. Farris J.S. 1969. A successive approximation approach to character weighting. Systematic Zoology 18: 374-385.
24. Farris J.S. 1982. Outgroups and parsimony. Systematic Zoology 31: 328-334.
25. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
26. Flerov U.K. 1952. Fauna SSSR. Mlekopitayushchie. Kabargi i oleni. Moscow: Akademia Nauk SSSR.
27. Flower W.H. 1875. On the arrangement of the orders and families of existing Mammalia. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London: 178-186.
28. Gatesy J., O’Grady P. & Baker R.H. 1999. Corroboration among data sets in simultaneous analysis: hidden support for phylogenetic relationships among higher level Artiodactyl taxa. Cladistics 15: 271-313.
29. Gautier J.Y. 1982. Socioécologie. Toulouse: Privat.
30. Geist V. 1987. On the evolution of optical signals in deer: a preliminary analysis, In: Wemmer C.M., Edit. The biology and management of the Cervidae. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 235-258.
31. Geist V. 1999. Deer of the world. Their evolution, behaviour, and ecology. Mechanisburg: Stackpole Books.
32. Gentry A.W. 1994. The Miocene differentiation of old world Pecora. Historical Biology 7: 115-158.
33. Gentry A.W. & Hooker J.J. 1988. The phylogeny of the Artiodactyla, In: Benton M.J., Edit. The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods, Vol. 2: Mammals. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 235-272.
34. Ginsburg L. 1988. La faune des mammifères des sables miocènes du synclinal d’Esvres (Valde-Loire). Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris 307: 319-322.
35. Gould S.J. 1974. The origin and function of “bizarre” structures: antler size and skull size in the “Irish elk”, Megaloceros giganteus. Evolution 28: 191-220.
36. Grancolas P., Deleporte P., Desutter-Grancolas L. & Daugeron C. 2001. Phylogenetics and ecology: as many characters as possible should be included in the cladistic analysis. Cladistics 17: 104-110.
37. Groves C. & Grubb P. 1987. Classification of living cervids, In: Wemmer C.M., Edit. The biology and management of the Cervidae. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 21-59.
38. Grubb P. 2000. Valid or invalid nomenclature of living and fossil deer, Cervidae. Acta Theriologica 45: 289-307.
39. Heinroth O. 1910. Beitrage zur Biologie namentlich Ethologie und Psychologie der Anatiden. Verhandlungsberichte des Internationales Ornithologiekongresses Berlin: 600-615.
40. Hennig W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
41. Hofmann R.R. 1968. Comparisons of the rumen and omasum structure in East African game ruminants in relation to their feeding habits. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London 21: 179-194.
42. Iason G.R. & Van Wieren S.E. 1999. Digestive and ingestive adaptations of mammalian herbivores to low quality forage, In: Olff H. et al., Edits. Herbivores: between plants and predators, 38th Symposium of the British Ecological Society. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 337-369.
43. Irwin R.E. 1996. The phylogenetic content of Avian courtship display and song evolution, In: Martins E.P., Edit. Phylogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 234-254.
44. Janis C. 1990. Correlation of reproductive and digestive strategies in the evolution of cranial appendages, In: Bubenik G.A. & Bubenik A.B., Edits. Horns, pronghorns, and antlers: evolution, morphology, physiology, and social significance. New York: Springer Verlag, pp. 114-133.
45. Janis C. 1993. Tertiary mammal evolution in the context of changing climates, vegetation, and tectonic events. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 467-500.
46. Janis C. & Scott K. 1987. Ruminant phylogeny. American Museum Novitates 2893: 1-80.
47. Kerr R.A. 1992. When climate twitches, evolution takes great leaps. Science 257: 1622-1624.
48. Kluge A.J. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology 38: 7-25.
49. Kraus F. & Miyamoto M.M. 1991. Rapid cladogenesis among the pecoran ruminants: evidence from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Systematic Zoology 40: 117-130.
50. Kurt F. 1968. Das Sozialverhalten des Rehes (Capreolus capreolus L.). Mammalia Depicta 3.
51. Kurt F. & Hartl G.B. 1995. Socio-ethogram of adult males versus biochemical-genetic variation in assessing phylogenetic relationships of the Caprinae. Acta Theriologica (Suppl.) 3: 183-197.
52. Lai J. & Sheng H. 1993. A comparative study on scent-marking of captive forest musk deer and Reeve‘s muntjac. In: Otaishi N. & Sheng H.I., Edits. Deer of China: biology and management. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
53. Leinders J.J.M. & Heintz E. 1980. The configuration of the lacrimal orifices in Pecorans and Tragulids (Artiodactyla, Mammalia) and its significance for the distinction between Bovidae and Cervidae. Beaufortia 30: 155-162.
54. Lister A.M. 1993. Evolution of mammoth and moose: the Holarctic perspective. In: Martin R.A. & Barnosky A.D., Edits. Morphological change in Quaternary mammals of North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Lorenz K. 1941. Vergleichende Bewegungstudien an Anatiden. Journal of Ornithology 89: 194-283.
56. Lundrigan B. 1996. Morphology of horns and fighting behavior in the family Bovidae. Journal of Mammalogy 77: 462-475.
57. Macnamara M. & Eldridge W.D. 1987. Behavior and reproduction in captive pudu (Pudu pudu) and red brocket (Mazama americana), a descriptive and comparative analysis, In: Wemmer C.M., Edit. The biology and management of the Cervidae. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 371-387.
58. Mattern M.Y. & Mclennan D.A. 2000. Phylogeny and speciation of felids. Cladistics 16: 232-245.
59. Mclennan D.A., Brooks D.R. & Mcphail J.D. 1988. The benefits of communication between comparative ethology and phylogenetic systematics: a case study using gastereid fishes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 2177-2190.
60. Miyamoto M.M., Kraus F. & Ryder O.A. 1990. Phylogeny and evolution of antlered deer determined from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 87: 6127-6131.
61. Muller-Schwarze D. 1987. Evolution of cervid olfactory communication, In: Wemmer C.M., Edit. The biology and management of the Cervidae. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 223-234.
62. Mysterud A. 1998. The relative roles of body size and feeding type of activity time of temperate ruminants. Oecologia 113: 442-446.
63. Nixon K.C. & Carpenter J.M. 1996. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12: 221-241.
64. Perez-Barberia F.J., Gordon I.J. & Nores C. 2001. Evolutionary transitions among feeding styles and habitats in Ungulates. Evolutionary Ecology Research 3: 221-230.
65. Randi E., Mucci N., Claro-Hergueta F., Bonnet A. & Douzery E. 2001. A mitochondrial DNA control region phylogeny of the Cervinae: speciation in Cervus and implications for conservation. Animal Conservation 4: 1-11.
66. Randi E., Mucci N., Pierpaoli M. & Douzery E. 1998. New phylogenetic perspectives on the Cervidae (Artiodactyla) are provided by the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 265: 793-801.
67. Recuerda P. & Arias De Reyna L. 1980. Ethograma del ciervo (Cervus elaphus) en periodo de no reprodución. Doñana, Acta Vertebrata 7: 229-248.
68. Scherpe W.P. 1971. Beobachtungen am Verhalten des chineschen Wasserrehes (Hydropotes inermis, Swinhoe), des indischen Muntjaks (Muntiacus muntjak muntjak, Zimmerman) und des chinesischen Muntjaks (Muntiacus reevesi, Ogilby). Berlin: Freie Universität von Berlin.
69. Scott K. & Janis C. 1987. Phylogenetic relationships of the Cervidae, and the case for a superfamily “Cervoidea”, In: Wemmer C.M., Edit. The biology and management of the Cervidae. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 3-20.
70. Scott K. & Janis C. 1993. Relationships of the Ruminantia (Artiodactyla) and an analysis of the characters used in ruminant taxonomy, In: Szalay F.S. et al., Edits. Mammals phylogeny: placentals. New York: Springer Verlag, pp. 282-300.
71. Simpson G.G. 1945. Principles of classification and a classification of the mammals. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 85: 1-350.
72. Sokolov V.J. & Danilikin A.A. 1980. Einige aspecte der systematik, Okologie und des verhaltens des Sibirischen rehes (Capreolus capreolus pygargus Pallas, 1771). Beitrage zur Jagd-und Wildforschung 11: 276-288.
73. Sun L. & Dai N. 1995. Male and female association and mating system in the Chinese water deer (Hydropotes inermis). Mammalia 59: 171-178.
74. Swofford D.L. 1993. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (PAUP) Computer Program. Version 3.1.1. Champaign: Illinois Natural History Survey.
75. Tinbergen N. 1959. Comparative studies of the behaviour of gulls. Behaviour 15: 1-70.
76. Walther F.R. 1984. Communication and expression in hoofed mammals. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
77. Webb S.D. & Taylor B.E. 1980. The phylogeny of hornless ruminants and a description of the cranium of Archaeomeryx. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 167: 121-157.
78. Wenzel J.W. 1992. Behavioral homology and phylogeny. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23: 361-381.
79. Whitehead G.K. 1972. Deer of the world. London: Constable.
80. Whitman C.O. 1899. The behaviour of pigeons. Carnegie Institution Washington Publication 257: 1-161.
81. Wimberger P.H. & De Queiroz A. 1996. Comparing behavioral and morphological characters as indicators of phylogeny, In: Martins E.P., Edit. Phylogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 206-233.
82. Zhang E. 2000. Daytime activity budgets of the Chinese water deer (Hydropotes inermis). Mammalia 64: 163-172.