Application of semilinear canonical correlation to the measurement of the electroencephalographic effects of volatile anaesthetics

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 735-741

  Bruhn, J ^a   Rehberg, B ^a   Ropcke H ^a   Bouillon, T ^a   Hoeft, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Electroencephalography; Monitoring, intraoperative

Indexed keywords

DESFLURANE; INHALATION ANESTHETIC AGENT; ISOFLURANE; SEVOFLURANE; DRUG DERIVATIVE; ETHER DERIVATIVE; INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETIC AGENT;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; HUMAN; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DRUG EFFECT; ELECTIVE SURGERY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; PATIENT MONITORING; STATISTICAL MODEL; VOLATILIZATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANESTHETICS, INHALATION; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; ISOFLURANE; METHYL ETHERS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE; VOLATILIZATION;

EID: 0036790689     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003643-200210000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Rampil IJ. A primer for EEG signal processing in anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 980-1002.
2. Gregg KM, Varvel JR, Shafer SL. Application of semilinear canonical correlation to the measurement of opioid drug effect. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1992; 20: 611-635.
3. Gambus PL, Gregg KM, Shafer SL. Validation of the alfentanil canonical univariate parameter as a measure of opioid effect on the electroencephalogram. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 747-756.
4. Schnider TW, Minto CF, Fiset P, Gregg KM, Shafer SL. Semilinear canonical correlation applied to the measurement of the electroencephalographic effects of midazolam and flumazenil reversal. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 510-519.
5. Rampil IJ, Holzer JA, Quest DO, Rosenbaum SH, Correll JW. Prognostic value of computerized EEG analysis during carotid endarterectomy. Anesth Analg 1983; 62: 186-192.
6. Schwilden H, Stoeckel H. Quantitative EEG analysis during anaesthesia with isoflurane in nitrous oxide at 1.3 and 1.5 MAC. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59: 738-745.
7. Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL, et al. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 1502-1516.
8. Bruhn J, Röpcke H, Hoeft A. Approximate entropy as an EEG measure of anesthetic drug effect during desflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 715-726.
9. Rehberg B, Bouillon T, Zinserling J, Hoeft A. Comparative pharmacodynamic modeling of the electroencephalography-slowing effect of isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 397-405.
10. Sheiner LB, Stanski DR, Vozeh S, Miller RD, Ham J. Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: application to D-tubocurarine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1979; 25: 358-371.
11. Hill AV. The possible effect of the aggregation of the molecules of hemoglobin on its dissociation curves. J Physiol 1910; 40: iv-vii.
12. Bowerman B, O'Connell R. Simple Coefficients of Determination and Correlation, Linear Statistical Models (An Applied Approach). Boston, USA: PWS-Kent, 1990: 174-183.
13. Röpcke H, Könen-Bergmann M, Bouillon T, Schwilden H. Electroencephalographic effects of desflurane during surgical stimulation. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: A324.