Pharmacokinetic modeling of Gd-DTPA extravasation in brain tumors

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 37, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 562-570

  Lüdemann, Lutz ^a   Wurm, Reinhard ^a   Zimmer, Claus ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Brain tumor; Endothelial permeability; MR imaging; Pharmacokinetic theory

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER; BRAIN TUMOR; CELL VIABILITY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIFFUSION; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; FEMALE; GLIOBLASTOMA; GLIOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; MENINGIOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; SCHOOL CHILD; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TISSUE NECROSIS; TISSUE PERFUSION;

EID: 0036784945     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-200210000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Folkman J. What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent? J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82:4-6.
2. Folkman J. The role of angiogenesis in tumor growth. Cancer Biology 1992;3:65-71.
3. Wesseling P, Ruiter DJ, Burger PC. Angiogenesis in brain tumors; pathobiological and clinical aspects. J Neuro-Oncol 1997;32:253-265.
4. Jain RK. Transport of molecules across tumor vasculature. Cancer Metastasis Rev 1987;6:559-593.
5. Jain RK. Therapeutic implications of tumor physiology. Curr Opin Oncol 1991;3:1105-1108.
6. Brix G, Semmler W, Port R, et al. Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 4:621-628.
7. Hawighorst H, Engenhart R, Knopp MV, et al. Intracranial meningiomas: time- and dose-dependent effects of irradiation on tumor microcirculation monitored by dynamic MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15:423-432.
8. den Boer JA, Hoenderop RKKM, Smink J, et al. Pharmacokinetic analysis of Gd-DTPA enhancement in dynamic three-dimensional MRI of breast lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:702-715.
9. Parker GJM, Suckling J, Tanner SF, et al. Probing tumor microvascularity by measurement, analysis and display of contrast agent uptake kinetics. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:564-574.
10. Roberts HC, Roberts TPL, Brasch RC, et al. Quantitative measurement of microvascular permeability in human brain tumors achieve using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: Correlation with histological grade. AJNR 2000;21:891-899.
11. Zhu XP, Li KL, Kamaly-Asl ID, et al. Quantification of endothelial permeability, leakage space, and blood volume in brain tumors using combined T1 and T2* contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:575-585.
12. Degani H, Gusis V, Weinstein D, et al. Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution. Nat Med 1997;3:780-782.
13. Tofts PS, Kermode AG. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med 1991;17:357-367.
14. Daldrup H, Shames DM, Wendland M, et al. Correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with histologic tumor grade: comparison of macromolecular and small-molecular contrast media. Pediatr Radiol 1998;28:67-78.
15. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:223-232.
16. Adamson RH, Lenz JF, Curry FE. Quantitative laser scanning confocal microscopy on single capillaries: permeability measurement. Microcirculation 1994;1:251-265.
17. Su M-Y, Mühler A, Lao X, et al. Tumor characterization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using MR contrast agents of various molecular weights. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:259-269.
18. Verstraete KL, De Deene Y, Roels H, et al. Benign and malignant musculoskeletal lesions: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging parametric "first-pass" images depict tissue vascularization and perfusion. Radiology 1994;192:835-843.
19. Verstraete KL, Vanzieleghem B, De Deene Y, et al. Static, dynamic and first-pass MR imaging of musculoskeletal lesions using gadodiamide injection. Acta Radiol 1995;36:27-36.
20. van den Biesen PR. Dye extravasation and the nature of background fluorescence in sodium fluorescein angiography. Retina 1997;17: 540-546.
21. Barbier EL, den Boer JA, Peters AR, et al. A model of the dual effect of gadopentetate dimeglumine on dynamic brain MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:242-253.
22. Donahue KM, Weisskoff RM, Parmelee DJ, et al. Dynamic Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI measurement of tissue cell volume fraction. Magn Reson Med. 1995;34:423-432.
23. Wendland MF, Saeed M, Yu KK, et al. Inversion recovery EPI of bolus transit in rat myocardium using intravascular and extravascular gadolinium-based MR contrast media: dose effects on peak signal enhancement. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:319-329.
24. Rosen BR, Belliveau JW, Chien D. Perfusion imaging by nuclear magnetic resonance. Magn Res Q 1989;5:263-281.
25. Port RE, Knopp MV, Hoffmann U, et al. Multicompartment analysis of gadolinium chelate kinetics: blood-tissue exchange in mammary tumors as monitored by dynamic MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:233-241.
26. Wesseling P, van der Laak JAWM, de Leeuw H, et al. Quantitative immunohistological analysis of the microvasculature in untreated human glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurosurg 1994;81:902-909.
27. Aronen HJ, Gazit IE, Louis DN, et al. Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic finding. Radiology 1994;191:41-51.
28. Padhani AR, Gapinski CJ, Macvicar DA, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation with morphology and tumor stage, histological grade and PSA. Clin Radiol 2000;55:99-109.
29. Kvistad KA, Rydland J, Vainio J, et al. Breast lesions: Evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 2000; 216:545-553.
30. Fu BM, Tsay R, Curry FE, Weinbaum S. A junction-orifice-fiber entrance layer model for capillary permeability: application to frog mesenteric capillaries. J Biomech Eng. 1994;116:502-513.
31. Fu BM, Curry FE, Weinbaum S. A diffusion wake model for tracer ultrastructure-permeability studies in microvessels. Am J Physiol (Heart Circ Physiol.) 1995;269:H2124-H2140.
32. 2 - and 99mTc(DTPA) in rats. Magn Reson Imaging 1990;8:567-575.
33. Hawighorst H, Knapstein PG, Weikel W, et al. Angiogenesis of uterine cervical carcinoma: characterization by pharmacokinetic magnetic resonance parameters and histological microvessel density with correlation to lymphatic involvement. Cancer Res 1997;57:4777-4786.
34. Hawighorst H, Knapstein PG, Knopp MV, et al. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic analysis of time-intensity curves for assessment of tumor angiogenesis and patient survival. Cancer Res 1998;58:3598-3602.
35. Fu BM, Adamson RH, Curry FE. Test of a two-pathway model for small-solute exchange across the capillary wall. Am J Physiol 1998;274:H2062-H2073.
36. Curry FE. Mechanics and thermodynamics of transcapillary exchange. In: Handbook of Physiology. Cardiovascular System. Microcirculation, chapter 8, pages 309-374. Bethesda, MD: Am Physiol Soc; 1984.
37. Nicolson C, Phillips JM. Ion diffusion modified by tortuosity and volume fraction in the extracellular micoenviroment of the rat cerebrellum. J Physiol 1981;321:225-257.
38. Lundbaek JA, Hansen AJ. Brain interstitial volume fraction and tortuosity in anoxia, evaluation of the ion-selective micro-electrode method. Acta Physiol Scand 1992;146:473-484.
39. Gerlowski LE, Jain RK. Microvascular permeability of normal and neoplastic tissues. Microvasc Res 1986;31:288-305.
40. Bernsen HJJA, Rijken PFJW, Hagemeier NEM, et al. A quantitative analysis of vascularization and perfusion of human glioma xenografts at different implantation sits. Microvasc Res 1999;57:244-257.
41. Sanson M, Richard S, Delattre O, et al. Allelic loss on chromosome 22 correlates with histopathological predictors of recurrence of meningiomas. Int J Cancer 1992;50:391-394.