Effects of the social conditions of housing through testing on cocaine-induced contextual sensitisation and conditioned locomotion in C57BL/6J mice

Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1185-1191

  Michel, Anne ^a   Tirelli, Ezio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

C57BL 6J mice; Cocaine; Conditioned drug effects; Contextual sensitisation; Locomotion; Social grouping; Social isolation

Indexed keywords

COCAINE;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG SENSITIZATION; HOUSING; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; NONHUMAN; SEXUAL MATURATION; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL ISOLATION;

ANIMALS; COCAINE; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; FEMALE; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL ISOLATION;

EID: 0036775440     PISSN: 02785846     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0278-5846(02)00258-0     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ahmed S.H., Stinus L., Le Moal M., Cador M. Social deprivation enhances the vulnerability of male Wistar rats to stressor- and amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization. Psychopharmacology. 117:1995;116-124.
2. Ahmed S.H., Stinus L., Cador M. Amphetamine-induced conditioned activity is insensitive to perturbations known to affect pavlovian conditioned responses in rats. Behav. Neurosci. 112:1998;1167-1176.
3. Anagnostaras S.G., Robinson T.E. Sensitization of the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine: modulation by associative learning. Behav. Neurosci. 110:1996;1397-1414.
4. Bardo M.T., Bowling S.L., Rowlett J.K., Manderscheid P., Buxton S.T., Dwoskin L.P. Environmental enrichment attenuates locomotor sensitization, but not in vitro dopamine release, induced by amphetamine. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 51:1995;397-405.
5. Battisti J.J., Chang C.H., Uretsky N.J., Wallace L.J. Sensitization of stereotyped behavior to amphetamine is context and response dependent. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 63:1999;263-269.
6. Boyle A.E., Gill K., Smith B.R., Amit Z. Differential effects of an early housing manipulation on cocaine induced activity and self-administration in laboratory rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 39:1991;269-274.
7. Cailhol S., Mormede P. Strain and sex differences in the locomotor response and behavioral sensitization to cocaine in hyperactive rats. Brain Res. 842:1999;200-205.
8. Crombag H.S., Badiani A., Maren S., Robinson T.E. The role of contextual versus discrete drug-associated cues in promoting the induction of psychomotor sensitization to intravenous amphetamine. Behav. Brain Res. 116:2000;1-22.
9. Darymple-Alford J.C., Benton D. The effect of social isolation of the rat on open-field activity and emergence. Behav. Proc. 6:1981;283-290.
10. Del Pozo F., DeFeudis F.V., Jimenez J.M. Motilities of isolated and aggregated mice; a difference in ultradian rhythmicity. Experientia. 34:1978;1302-1304.
11. Elmer G.I., Gorelick D.A., Goldberg S.R., Rothman R.B. Acute sensitivity vs. context-specific sensitization to cocaine as a function of genotype. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 53:1996;623-628.
12. Frances H., Graulet A., Debray M., Coudereau J.P., Gueris J., Bourre J.M. Morphine-induced sensitisation of locomotor activity in mice: effect of social isolation on plasma corticosterone levels. Brain Res. 860:2000;136-140.
13. Gentsch C., Lichtsteiner M., Frishknecht H.R., Feer H., Siegfried B. Isolation-induced locomotor hyperactivity and hypoalgesia in rats are prevented by handling and reversed by resocialisation. Physiol. Behav. 43:1988;13-16.
14. Hall F.S. Social deprivation of neonatal, adolescent, and adult rats has distinct neurochemical and behavioral consequences. Crit. Rev. Neurobiol. 12:1998;129-162.
15. Harmer C.J., Phillips G.D. Isolation rearing enhances acquisition in a conditioned inhibition paradigm. Physiol. Behav. 65:1998;525-533.
16. Jahkel M., Rilke O., Koch R., Oehler J. Open field locomotion and neurotransmission in mice evaluated by principal component factor analysis-effects of housing condition, individual activity disposition and psychotropic drugs. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatr. 24:2000;61-64.
17. King G.R., Ellinwood E.H. Jr., Silvia C., Joyner C.M., Xue Z., Caron M.G., Lee T.H. Withdrawal from continuous or intermittent cocaine administration: changes in D2 receptor function. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 269:1994;743-749.
18. Kuribara H. Importance of post-drug environmental factors for induction of sensitization to the ambulation-increasing effects of methamphetamine and cocaine in mice. Psychopharmacology. 126:1996;293-300.
19. Kuribara H. Induction of sensitization of hyperactivity caused by morphine in mice: effects of post-drug environment. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 57:1997;341-346.
20. Laviola G., Adriani W., Terranova M.L., Gerra G.T.I. Psychobiological risk factors for vulnerability to psychostimulants in human adolescents and animal models. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 23:1999;993-1010.
21. Martin-Iverson M.T., Fawcett S.L. Pavlovian conditioning of psychomotor stimulant-induced behaviours: has convenience led us astray? Behav. Pharmacol. 7:1996;24-41.
22. Michel A., Tirelli E. Conditioned hyperkinesia induced by cocaine in mice is dose-dependent but not correlated with the unconditioned response or the contextually-sensitized response. Behav. Pharmacol. 13:2002;59-71.
23. Michel A., Tirelli E. Post-sensitisation conditioned hyperlocomotion induced by cocaine augments as a function of dose in C57BL/6J mice. Behav. Brain Res. 132:2002;179-187.
24. Misslin R., Herzog F., Koch B., Ropartz P. Effects of isolation, handling and novelty on the pituitary-adrenal response in the mouse. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 7:1982;217-221.
25. Ohmori T., Abekawa T., Ito K., Koyama T. Context determines the type of sensitized behaviour: a brief review and a hypothesis on the role of environment in behavioural sensitization. Behav. Pharmacol. 11:2000;211-221.
26. Phillips G.D., Howes S.R., Whitelaw R.B., Wilkinson L.S., Robbins T.W. Isolation rearing enhances the locomotor response to cocaine and a novel environment, but impairs the intra-venous self-administration of cocaine. Psychopharmacology. 115:1994;407-418.
27. Post R.M., Weiss S.R.B., Pert A. The role of context and conditioning in behavioral sensitisation to cocaine. Psychopharmacol. Bull. 23:1987;425-428.
28. Robinson T.E., Berridge K.C. The psychology and neurobiology of addiction: an incentive-sensitization view. Addiction. 95:2000;91-117.
29. Robinson T.E., Browman K.E., Crombag H.S., Badiani A. Modulation of the induction or expression of psychostimulant sensitization by the circumstances surrounding drug administration. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 22:1998;347-354.
30. Rouge-Pont F., Marinelli M., Le Moal M., Simon H., Piazza P.V. Stress-induced sensitization and glucocorticoids: II. Sensitization of the increase in extracellular dopamine induced by cocaine depends on stress-induced corticosterone secretion. J. Neurosci. 15:1995;7189-7195.
31. Siegel S. Drug-anticipatory responses in animals. White L., Tursky B., Schwartz G.E. Placebo. Theory, Research, and Mechanisms. 1985;288-305 Guilford Press, New York.
32. Sircar R., Kim D. Female gonadal hormones differentially modulate cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization in Fischer, Lewis, and Sprague-Dawley rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 289:1999;54-65.
33. Smith J.K., Neill J.C., Costall B. Post-weaning housing conditions influence the behavioural effects of cocaine and d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology. 131:1997;23-33.
34. Stewart J., Badiani A. Tolerance and sensitization to the behavioral effects of drugs. Behav. Pharmacol. 4:1993;289-312.
35. Stewart J., Vezina P. Extinction procedure abolishes conditioned stimulus control but spare sensitized responding to amphetamine. Behav. Pharmacol. 2:1991;65-71.
36. Tirelli E., Ferrara M. Neonatal and preweanling rats are able to express short-term behavioral sensitization to cocaine. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 328:1997;103-114.
37. Weiss I.C., Domeney A.M., Heidbreder C.A., Moreau J.L., Feldon J. Early social isolation, but not maternal separation, affects behavioral sensitization to amphetamine in male and female adult rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 70:2001;397-409.
38. Wilcox R.R. New Statistical Procedures for the Social Sciences. 1987;Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
39. Willner P., Papp M., Cheeta S., Muscat R. Environmental influences on behavioural sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Behav. Pharmacol. 3:1992;43-50.
40. Wilmot C.A., VanderWende C., Spoerlein M.T. Behavioral and biochemical studies of dopamine receptor sensitivity in differentially housed mice. Psychopharmacology. 89:1986;364-369.
41. Yamada K., Ohki-Hamazaki H., Wada K. Differential effects of social isolation upon body weight, food consumption, and responsiveness to novel and social environment in bombesin receptor subtype-3 (BRS-3) deficient mice. Physiol. Behav. 68:2000;555-561.