Extracranial atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: Evaluation of non- breath-hold three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 170, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 489-495

  Slosman, Francois ^a,b   Stolpen, Alan H ^a   Lexa, Frank J ^a   Schnall, Mitchell D ^a   Langlotz, Curtis P ^a   Carpenter, Jeffrey P ^a   Goldberg, Herbert I ^a  

^a HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b University Hospital   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; BREATH HOLDING; CAROTID ARTERY DISEASE; CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0031906598     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.170.2.9456971     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study: endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 1995;273:1421-1428
2. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445-453
3. Mayberg M, Winn H. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: resolving the controversy (editorial). JAMA 1995;273:1459-1461
4. Litt A, Eidelman E, Pinto R, et al. Diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of 2DFT TOF MR angiography with contrast angiography in 50 patients. AJNR 1991;12:149-154
5. Huston J III, Lewis B, Wiebers D, Meyer F, Riederer S, Weaver A. Carotid artery: prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography with conventional angiography and duplex US. Radiology 1993;186:339-344
6. Polak J, Kalina P, Donaldson M, O'Leary D, Whittemore A, Mannick J. Carotid endarterectomy: preoperative evaluation of candidates with combined Doppler sonography and MR angiography. Radiology 1993;86:333-338
7. Heiserman J, Drayer B, Fram E, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1992;182:761-768
8. Polak J, Bajakian R, O'Leary D, Anderson M, Donaldson M, Jolesz F. Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of MR angiography, color Doppler sonography, and arteriography. Radiology 1992;182:35-40
9. Masaryk M, Ross J, DiCello M, Modic M, Paranandi L, Masaryk T. 3DFT MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation: potential and limitations as a screening examination. Radiology 1991;179:797-804
10. Edelman R, Mattle H, Wallner B, et al. Extracranial carotid arteries: evaluation with "black blood" MR angiography. Radiology 1990;177:45-50
11. Anson J, Heiserman J, Drayer B, Spetzler R. Surgical decisions on the basis of magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries. Neurosurgery 1993;32:335-343
12. Anderson C, Edelman R, Turski P. Clinical magnetic resonance angiography. New York: Raven, 1993:310
13. Dorfman D, Berbaum K, Metz C. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992;27:723-731
14. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174
15. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Jacoby WT, et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta. AJR 1996;166:1387-1397
16. Prince M. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 1994;191:155-164
17. Snidow J, Aisen A, Harris V, et al. Iliac artery MR angiography: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced and two-dimensional time-of-flight techniques. Radiology 1995;196:371-378
18. Saloner D, Rapp J, Anderson C, Gooding G, Reilly L. Evaluation of carotid bifurcation disease: discordant imaging findings (abstr). Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Berkeley, CA: Society of Magnetic Resonance, 1996:1:92
19. Begg C, McNeil B. Assessment of radiologic tests: control of bias and other design considerations. Radiology 1988;167:565-569
20. Anderson CM, Saloner D, Tsuruda JS, Shapeero LG, Lee RE. Artifacts in maximum-intensity-projection display of MR angiograms. AJR 1990;154:623-629
21. Korogi Y, Takahashi M, Nakagawa T, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: diagnostic accuracy of MR angiography with evaluation of maximum intensity projection and source images. Radiology 1996;199:199-207
22. Rieker O, Düber C, Schmiedt W, von Zitzewitz H, Schweden F, Thelen M. Prospective comparison of CT angiography of the legs with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJR 1996;166:269-276