Mcg light chain dimer as a model system for ligand design: A docking study

Journal of Molecular Recognition

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 331-340

  Yuriev, Elizabeth ^a   Ramsland, Paul A ^b  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b AUSTIN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Antibody; Combinatorial library; Cross reactivity; Docking; Ligand design; Peptide

Indexed keywords

DIMER; IMMUNOGLOBULIN LIGHT CHAIN; LIGAND; PEPTIDE;

CROSS REACTION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; LIGAND BINDING; MODEL; ANTIBODY COMBINING SITE; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; DIMERIZATION; DRUG DESIGN; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; METABOLISM; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

BINDING SITES, ANTIBODY; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DIMERIZATION; DRUG DESIGN; HUMANS; IMMUNOGLOBULIN LIGHT CHAINS; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PEPTIDES;

EID: 0036761180     PISSN: 09523499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmr.595     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Arevalo JH, Taussig MJ, Wilson IA. 1993. Molecular basis of crossreactivity and the limits of antibody-antigen complementarity. Nature 365: 859-863.
2. Bolger MB, Sherman MA. 1991. Computer modeling of combining site structure of anti-hapten monoclonal antibodies. Meth. Enzymol. 203: 21-45.
3. Cherfils J, Bizebard T, Knossow M, Janin J. 1994. Rigid-body docking with mutant constraints of influenza hemagglutinin with antibody HC19. Proteins 18: 8-18.
4. Connolly ML. 1983. Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. Science 221: 709-713.
5. Edmundson AB, Ely KR. 1986. Three-dimensional analyses of the binding of synthetic chemotactic and opioid peptides in the Mcg light chain dimer. Ciba Found. Symp. 119: 107-129.
6. Edmundson AB, Ely KR, Herron JN, Cheson BD. 1987. The binding of opioid peptides to the Mcg light chain dimer: Flexible keys and adjustable locks. Mol. Immunol. 24: 915-935.
7. Edmundson AB, Harris DL, Tribbick G, Geysen HM. 1991. Binding of peptides to proteins: An exercise in molecular design. Ciba Found. Symp. 158: 213-230.
8. Edmundson AB, Harris DL, Fan Z-C, Guddat LW, Schley BT, Hanson BL, Tribbick G, Geysen HM. 1993. Principles and pitfalls in designing site-directed peptide ligands. Proteins 16: 246-267.
9. Edmundson AB, Tribbick G, Plompen S, Geysen HM, Yuriev E, Ramsland PA. 2001. Binding of synthetic peptides by a human monoclonal IgM with an unusual combining site structure. J. Mol. Recognit. 14: 229-238.
10. Ely KR, Herron JN, Harker M, Edmundson AB. 1989. Three-dimensional structure of a light chain dimer crystallized in water. Conformational flexibility of a molecule in two crystal forms. J. Mol. Biol. 210: 601-615.
11. Ewing TJA, Kuntz ID. 1997. Critical evaluation of search algorithms for automated molecular docking and database searching. J. Comput. Chem. 18: 1175-1189.
12. Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. 2002. Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 47: 409-443.
13. Harris DL, King E, Ramsland PA, Edmundson AB. 2000. Binding of nascent collagen by amyloidogenic light chains and amyloid fibrillogenesis in monolayers of human fibrocytes. J. Mol. Recognit. 13: 198-212.
14. Henry CM. 2001. Structure-based drug design. C&EN 79: 69-78.
15. Kubinyi H. 2002. The design of combinatorial libraries. Drug Discov. Today 7: 503-504.
16. Lahana R. 1999. How many leads from HTS. Drug Discov. Today 4: 447-448.
17. Leach AR, Kuntz ID. 1992. Conformational analysis of flexible ligands in macromolecular receptor sites. J. Comput. Chem. 13: 730-748.
18. Makino S, Kuntz ID. 1997. Automated flexible ligand docking method and its application for database search. J. Comput. Chem. 18: 1812-1825.
19. McDonald IK, Thornton JM. 1994. Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 238: 777-793.
20. Norel R, Petrey D, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. 1999. Examination of shape complementarity in docking of unbound proteins. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 35: 403-419.
21. Padlan EA. 1994. Anatomy of the antibody molecule. Mol. Immunol. 31: 169-217.
22. Shoichet BK, Kuntz ID. 1991. Protein docking and complementarity. J. Mol. Biol. 221: 327-346.
23. Sleigh SH, Seavers PR, Wilkinson AJ, Ladbury JE, Tame JR. 1999. Crystallographic and calorimetric analysis of peptide binding to OppA protein. J. Mol. Biol. 291: 393-415.
24. Sotriffer CA, Flader W, Cooper A, Rode BM, Linthicum DS, Liedl KR, Varga JM. 1999. Ligand binding by antibody IgE Lb4: Assessment of binding site preferences using microcalorimetry, docking, and free energy simulations. Biophys. J. 76: 2966-2977.
25. Tribbick G, Edmundson AB, Mason TJ, Geysen HM. 1989. Similar binding properties of peptide ligands for a human immunoglobulin and its light chain dimer. Mol. Immunol. 26: 625-635.
26. Wallace AC, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. 1995. LIGPLOT: A program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Engng 8: 127-134.
27. Wang J, Kollman PA, Kuntz ID. 1999. Flexible ligand docking: A multistep strategy approach. Proteins 36: 1-19.
28. Yuriev E, Ramsland PA, Edmundson AB. 2001. Docking of combinatorial peptide libraries into a broadly cross-reactive human IgM. J. Mol. Recognit. 14: 172-184.
29. Yuriev E, Ramsland PA, Edmundson AB. 2002. Recognition of IgG-derived peptides by a human IgM with an unusual combining site. Scand. J. Immunol. 55: 242-253.