Comparison of DXA and MRI methods for interpreting femoral neck bone mineral density

Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 289-296

  Arokoski, Merja H ^a,b,d   Arokoski, Jari P A ^b,c   Vainio, Pauli ^b   Niemitukia, Lea H ^b   Kröger, Heikki ^b   Jurvelin, Jukka S ^b  

^a Nilsiä Health Centre   (Finland)

^b KUOPIO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine ^*  (Finland)

^d Nisiä Health Centre   (Finland)

Author keywords

Bone densitometry; Bone mineral density; DXA; Femoral neck; Hip; MRI

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE MINERAL; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COXITIS; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMUR NECK; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0036750639     PISSN: 10946950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1385/JCD:5:3:289     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adams JE. 1998 Single-and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. In: Bone Densitometry and Osteoporosis. Genant HK, ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, 305-334.
2. Bolotin HH, Sievänen H, Grashuis JL, Kuiper JW, Järvinen TL. 2001 Inaccuracies inherent in patient-specific dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral density measurements: comprehensive phantom-based evaluation. J Bone Miner Res 16:417-426.
3. Andresen R, Radmer S, Banzer D. 1998 Bone mineral density and spongiosa architecture in correlation to vertebral body insufficiency fractures. Acta Radiol 39:538-542.
4. Sievänen H, Koskue V, Rauhio A, Kannus P, Heinonen A, Vuori I. 1998 Peripheral quantitative computed tomography in human long bones: evaluation of in vitro and in vivo precision. J Bone Miner Res 13:871-882.
5. Genant HK, Block JE, Steiger P, Glueer CC, Smith R 1987. Quantitative computed tomography in assessment of osteoporosis. Semin Nucl Med 17:316-333.
6. Cody DD, McCubbrey DA, Divine GW, Gross GJ, Goldstein SA. 1996 Predictive value of proximal femoral bone densitometry in determining local orthogonal material properties. J Biomech 29:753-761.
7. Carter DR, Bouxsein ML, Marcus R. 1992 New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data. J Bone Miner Res 7:137-145.
8. Kröger H, Kotaniemi APV, Alhava E. 1992 Bone densitometry of the spine and femur in children by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Bone Miner 17:75-85.
9. Cummings SR, Marcus R, Palermo L, Ensrud KE, Genant HK. 1994 Does estimating volumetric bone density of the femoral neck improve the prediction of hip fracture? A prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 9:1429-1432.
10. Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Carey MA, Johnston CC. 1995 Choosing between predictors of fractures. J Bone Miner Res 10:1816-1822.
11. Gilsanz V. 1998 Bone density in children: a review of the available techniques and indications. Eur J Radiol 26:177-182.
12. Katzman DK, Bachrach LK, Carter DR, Marcus R. 1991 Clinical and anthropometric correlates of bone mineral acquisition in healthy adolescent girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 73:1332-1339.
13. Arokoski JPA, Arokoski MH, Jurvelin JS, Helminen HJ, Niemitukia LH, Kröger H. 2001 Increased femoral neck bone mineral content and bone size in men with hip osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 61:145-150.
14. Ansell BM, Bywaters EGL. 1956 Growth in Still's disease. Ann Rheum Dis 15:295-319.
15. Shalet SM. 1989 Endocrine consequences of treatment of malignant disease. Arch Dis Child 64:1635-1641.
16. Leiper AD. 1990 Management of growth failure in the treatment of malignant disease. Pediatr Haematol Oncol 7:365-371.
17. Kotaniemi A, Savolainen A, Kautiainen H, Kröger H. 1993 Estimation of central osteopenia in children with chronic polyarthritis treated with glucocorticoids. Pediatrics 91:1127-1130.
18. Arikoski P, Komulainen J, Voutilainen R, Riikonen P, Parviainen M, Tapanainen P, et al. 1998 Reduced bone mineral density in long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 20:234-240.
19. Bhudhikanok GS, Wang MC, Eckert K, Matkin C, Marcus R, Bachrach LK. 1996 Differences in bone mineral in young Asian and Caucasian Americans may reflect differences in bone size. J Bone Miner Res 11:1545-1556.
20. van der Meulen MCH, Jepsen KJ, Mikic B. 2001 Understanding bone strength: size isn't everything. Bone 29:101-104.
21. Kröger H, Vainio P, Nieminen J, Kotaniemi A. 1995 Comparison of different models for interpreting bone mineral density measurements using DXA and MRI techology. Bone 17:157-159.
22. Wehrli FW, Ford JC, Attie M, Kressel HY, Kaplan FS. 1991 Trabecular structure: preliminary application of MR interferometry. Radiology 179:615-621.
23. Ito M, Hayashi K, Uetani M, Kawahara Y, Ohki M, Yamada M, et al. 1993 Bone mineral and other bone components in vertebrae evaluated by QCT and MRI. Skeletal Radiol 22:109-113.
24. Allein S, Majumdar S, De Bisschop E, Newitt DC, Luypaert R, Eisendrath H. 1997 In vivo comparison of MR phase distribution and 1/T2* with morphologic parameters in the distal radius. J Magn Reson Imagine 7:389-393.
25. Kröger H, Vainio P, Nieminen J. 1995 Estimation of spinal bone density using conventional MRI. Comparison between MRI and DXA in 32 subjects. Acta Orthop Scand 66:532-534.
26. Link TM, Majumdar S, Augat P, Lin JC, Newitt D, Lane NE, et al. 1998 Proximal femur: assessment for osteoporosis with T2* decay characteristics at MR imaging. Radiology 209:531-536.
27. Davis GA, Genant HK, Dunham JS. 1986 The effect of bone on proton NMR relaxation times of surrounding liquids. Invest Radiol 21:472-477.
28. Grampp S, Majumdar S, Jergas M, Newitt D, Lang P, Genant HK. 1996 Distal radius: in vivo assessment with quantitative MR imaging, peripheral quantitative CT, and dual x-ray absorptiometry. Radiology 198:213-218.
29. Brismar TB. 2000 MR relaxometry of lumbar spine, hip, and calcaneus in healthy premenopausal women: relationship with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound. Eur Radiol 10:1215-1221.
30. Louis O, Allein S, Luypaert R, Osteaux M. 2000 Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus. An in vivo comparison with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Densitom 3:43-48.
31. Kellgren JH, Jeffrey MR, Ball J. 1963 The epidemiology of chronic rehumatism. In: Atlas of Standard Radiographs of Arthritis. FA Davis, Philadelphia.
32. Huuskonen J, Väisänen SB, Kröger H, Jurvelin J, Bouchard C, Alhava E, et al. 2000 Determinants of bone mineral density in middle aged men: a population-based study. Osteoporosis Int 11:702-708.
33. Peel NFA, Eastell R. 1994 Diagnostic value of estimated volumetric bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:317-320.
34. Lu PW, Cowell CT, Lloyd-Jones SA, Briody JN, Howman-Giles R. 1996 Volumetric bone mineral density in normal subjects, aged 5-27 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:1586-1590.
35. Girard MS, Sartoris DJ, Moscona AV, Ramos E. 1994 Measured femoral density by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry as a function of rotation. Orthoped Rev 1:38-40.
36. Blake GM, Fogelman I. 1997 Technical principles of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Semin Nucl Med 27:210-228.
37. Kröger H, Tuppurainen M, Honkanen R, Alhave E, Saarikoski S. 1994 Bone mineral density and risk factors for osteoporosis-a population-based study of 1600 perimenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 55:1-7.
38. Majumdar S, Genant HK. 1992 In vivo relationship between marrow T2* and trabecular bone density determined with a chemical shift-selective asymmetric spin-echo sequence. J Magn Res Imaging 2:209-219.
39. Ford JC, Wehrli FW. 1991 In vivo quantitative characterization of trabecular bone by NMR interferometry and localized proton spectroscopy. J Magn Res Med 17:543-551.
40. Sugimoto H, Kimura T, Ohsawa T. 1993 Susceptibility effects of bone trabeculae. Quantification in vivo using an asymmetric spin-echo technique. investigative Radiology 28:208-213.
41. Majumdar S, Genant HK. 1995 A review of the recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 5:79-92.
42. Majumdar S. 1991 Quantitative study of the susceptibility differences between trabecular bone and bone marrow: computer simulations. Magn Reson Med 22:101-110.
43. Rosenthal H, Thulborn KR, Rosenthal DI, Kim SH, Rosen BR. 1990 Magnetic susceptibility effects of trabecular bone on magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow. Invest Radiol 25:173-178.
44. Jergas MD, Majumdar S, Keyak JH, Lee IY, Newitt DC, Grampp S, et al. 1995 Relationships between young modulus of elasticity, ash density, and MRI derived effective transverse relaxation T2* in tibial specimens. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19:472-479.
45. Chung H, Wehrli FW, Williams JL, Kugelmass SD. 1993 Relationship between NMR transverse relaxation, trabecular bone architecture, and strength. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:10,250-10,254.