Biliary stones and stenoses: Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiography

Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 139-145

  Tekin, Ahmet ^a   Saygili, Muvaffak ^a   Hafta, Ali ^a   Öztan, Süleyman ^a  

^a NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Bile duct stenosis; Choledocholithiasis; Magnetic resonance cholangiography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT DISEASE; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; BILIARY TRACT DISEASE; BILIARY TRACT ENDOSCOPY; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GALLSTONE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0036747814     PISSN: 13004948     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee tg, Katon RM. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterelogy 1976; 70: 314-20.
2. Sherman S, Lehman G. ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy induced pancreatittis. Pancreas 1991; 3: 350-67.
3. Cohen SA, Siegel JH, Kasmin FE. Complications of diagnontic and therapeutic ERCP. Abdominal Imaging 1996; 21: 385-94.
4. Reiertsen O, Skioto J, Jacopsen CD. Complication of fiberoptic gastrointestinal endoscopy: five years experience in a central hospital. Endoscopy 1987; 19: 1-6.
5. Gross BH, Harter L, Gore RM. Ultrasonic evaluation of common bile duct stones: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1983; 146: 471-4.
6. Mitchell SE, Clark RA. A comparison of computed tomography and sonography in choledocholithiasis. ARJ 1984; 142: 723-33.
7. Baron RL. Common bile duct stones: reassessment of criteria for CT diagnosis. Radiology 1987; 162: 419-24.
8. Stockberger SM, Wass JL, Sherman S, et al. Intravenous cholangiography. Radiology 1994; 192: 675-80.
9. Van Beers BE, La Cross M, Trigaux JP, et al. Noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree before and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: use of the three dimensional spiral CT cholangiography. ARJ 1994; 162: 1331-5.
10. Fleischmann D, Ringl H, Schöfl R. Three dimensional spiral CT cholangiography in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1996; 198: 861-8.
11. Van beers BE, Lacrosse M, Trigaux JP, et al. Noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: use of three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography. AJR 1994; 162: 1331-5.
12. Ishizaki Y, Wakayama T, Okada Y, Kobayashi T. Magnetic resonance cholangiography for evaluation of obstructive jaundice. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 12: 2072-7.
13. Outwater EK. MR cholangiography with a fast spin-echo sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3: 131.
14. Chan Y, Chan ACW, Lam WWM, et al. Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1996; 200: 85-9.
15. Morimoto K, Shimoi M, Shirakawa T. Biliary obstruction: evaluation with three-dimensional MR cholangiography. Radiology 1992; 183: 578-80.
16. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Renhold C, et al. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: value of MR cholangiography. AJR 1994; 163: 847-50.
17. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucal EK, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreotography. Gastroenterology 1996; 110: 589-97.
18. Reuther G, Kiefer B, Tuchmann A. Cholangiograph before biliary surgery: single-shot MR chlangiography versus intravenous cholangiography. Radiology 1996; 198: 561-6.
19. Miyazaki T, Yamashita Y, Tsuchigame T, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) sequences. AJR 1996; 166: 1297-1303.
20. Soto JA, Barish MA, Alvarez O, Medina S. Detection of choledocholithiasis with MR cholangiography: comparison of three-dimensional fast spin-echo and single and multisection half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences. Radiology 2000; 21: 737-45.
21. Irie H, Honda H, Tajima T. Optimal MR cholangiopancreatography sequence and its clinical application. Radiology 1988; 206: 379-87.
22. Varghese JC, Farrell MA, Courtney G, et al. A comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancretography in the evolution of patients with suspected biliary tract disease. Clin radiol 1999; 54: 513-20.
23. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW. MR cholangiography: technical advances and clinical applications. Radio Graphics 1999; 19: 25-41.
24. Becker CD, Grossholz M, Becker M, et al. Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1997; 205: 523-30.