Three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: Comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography

Radiology

Volumn 198, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 861-868

  Fleischmann, Dominik ^a   Ringl, Helmut ^a   Schöfl, Rainer ^b   Pötzi, Regina ^b   Kontrus, Manfred ^a   Henk, Christine ^a   Bankier, Alexander A ^a   Kettenbach, Joachim ^a   Mostbeck, Gerhard H ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Bile ducts, CT; Bile ducts, stenosis or obstruction; Computed tomography (CT), helical; Computed tomography (CT), three dimensional; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

Indexed keywords

MEGLUMINE IODOXAMATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; CHILD; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMON BILE DUCT STENOSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEPATIC DUCT; HUMAN; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0030023869     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.198.3.8628884     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Siegel JH, Yatto RP. Approach to cholestasis: an update. Arch Intern Med 1982; 142:1877-1879.
2. Muhletaler CA, Gerlock AJ, Fleischer AC, James AE. Diagnosis of obstructive jaundice with nondilated bile ducts. AJR1980; 124:1149-1152.
3. Shimizu H, Ida M, Takayama S, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography in obstructive biliary disease: a comparative evaluation with direct cholangiography. Radiology 1981; 138:411-416.
4. Berland L, Lee JKT, Stanley RJ. Diseases of the biliary tract. In: Lee JKT, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, eds. Computed body tomography with MRI correlation. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Raven, 1989; 639-652.
5. Ott DJ, Gelfand DW. Complications of gastrointestinal radiologic procedures. II. Complications related to biliary tract studies. Gastrointest Radiol 1981; 6:47-56.
6. Siegel JH. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography: technique, diagnosis, and therapy. New York, NY: Raven, 1992.
7. Seifert E. Complications of endoscopic manipulation and dilatation: how do we prevent a catastrophe? In: Tytgat GNJ, van Blankenstein M, eds. Current topics in gastroenterology and hepatology. New York, NY: Thieme, 1990; 211.
8. Brink JA, Heiken JP, Balfe DM, Brown JJ, Borello JA, Vannier MW. Noninvasive cholangiography with spiral CT (abstr). Radiology 1992; 185(P):141.
9. Klein HM, Wein B, Truong S, Pfingsten FP, Günther RW. Computed tomographic cholangiography using spiral scanning and three-dimensional image processing. Br J Radiol 1993; 66:762-767.
10. Van Beers BE, Lacrosse M, Trigaux J-P, de Cannière L, De Ronde T, Pringot J. Non-invasive imaging of the biliary tree before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: use of three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography. AJR 1994; 162:1331-1335.
11. Stockberger SM, Wass JL, Sherman S, Lehman GA, Kopecky KK. Intravenous cholangiography with helical CT: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1994; 192:675-680.
12. Goldberg HI. Helical cholangiography: complementary or substitute study for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography? Radiology 1994; 192:615-616.
13. Dillon EH, van Leeuwen MS, Fernandez MA, Eikelboom BC, Mali WPTM. CT angiography: application to the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Radiology 1993; 189:211-219.
14. Healey JE, Schroy PC. Anatomy of the biliary ducts within the human liver: analysis of the prevailing pattern of branchings and the major variants of biliary ducts. Arch Surg 1953; 66:599-616.
15. Greenberg M, Greenberg BM, Rubin JM, Greenberg IM. Computed tomographic cholangiography: a new technique for evaluating the head of the pancreas and distal biliary tree. Radiology 1982; 144:363-368.
16. Arndt RD, Joyce PW, Gray RK, Haveson SB, Bos CJ. Iodipamide-enhanced computed tomography of the pancreas. Radiology 1981; 139:491-493.
17. Pretorius DH, Gosnik BB, Olson LK. CT of the opacified biliary tract: use of calcium ipodate. AJR 1982; 138:1073-1075.
18. Greenberg M, Rubin JM, Greenberg BM. Appearance of the gallbladder and biliary tree by CT cholangiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1983; 7:788-794.
19. Nessi R, Gattoni F, Boioli F, Tagliaferri B, Baldini U, Uslenghi C. Cholangiographically enhanced CT of the pancreas and biliary tree. Int Surg 1988; 73:38-41.
20. Musante F, Derchi LE, Bonati P. CT cholangiography in suspected Caroli's disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1982; 6:482-485.
21. Päivänsalo M, Merikanto J, Lähde S, et al. Radiographic diagnosis of bile duct cysts. Acta Radiol 1988; 29:657-660.
22. Höglund M, Muren C, Boijsen MW. Computed tomography with intravenous cholangiography contrast: a method for visualizing choledochal cysts. Eur J Radiol 1990; 10:159-161.
23. Cory DA, Don S, West KW. CT cholangiography of a choledochocele. Pediatr Radiol 1990; 21:73-74.
24. Itai Y, Ebihara R, Tohono E, et al. Hepatic peribiliary cysts: multiple tiny cysts within the larger portal tract, hepatic hilum, or both. Radiology 1994; 191:107-110.
25. Berk RN, Loeb PM. Biliary contrast materials. In: Berk RN, Ferrucci JT, Leopold GR, eds. Radiology of the gallbladder and bile ducts: diagnosis and intervention. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1983; 55-82.
26. Robbins AH, Earampamoorthy S, Koff RS, Di Fazio LT, Wickis EA, Gertler AN. Successful intravenous cholecystocholangiography in the jaundiced patient using meglumine iodoxamate (Cholovue). AJR 1976; 126:70-76.
27. Taenzer V, Volkhardt V. Double blind comparison of meglumine iotroxate (Biliscopin), meglumine iodoxamate (Endobil) and meglumine ioglycamate (Biligram). AJR 1979; 132:55-58.
28. Maier W. Cholezysto-cholangiographie mittels kurzinfusion von iodoxamat. Röntgen BI 1981; 34:20-23.
29. Schmerwitz W, Rösch E. Infusions-cholegraphie: der einfluß von kontrastsubstanz und kontrastmittelkonzentration sowie infusionszeit auf kontrastmittelausscheidung und nebenwirkungen. Röntgen BI 1977; 30:1-8.