Clinical testing of restorative materials: Some historical landmarks

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 543-550

  Randall, R C ^a   Wilson, N H F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY DENTAL HOSPITAL OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clinical testing; Dental restorative materials; Historical landmarks in dentistry

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL RESEARCH; DENTAL SURGERY; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FORECASTING; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW;

CLINICAL TRIALS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESEARCH; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; EVALUATION STUDIES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FORECASTING; GENERAL PRACTICE, DENTAL; HUMANS;

EID: 0033228230     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00028-7     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. Guerni VA. History of dentistry. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1909.
2. Violaki-Paraskeva M. Hippocrates: an ideal that lives. World Health Forum 1995;16:394-397.
3. Stearn WT. From Theophratus and Dioscorides to Sibthorp and Smith: the background and origin of the Flora Graeca. Biological Journal of the Linnaes Society 1976;8:285-289.
4. Stockwell C. Nature's pharmacy: a history of plants and healing. London: Century, 1988.
5. Weinberger BW. An introduction to the history of dentistry. St Louis: CV Mosby, 1948.
6. Lindsay L. The surgeon dentist or treatise on the teeth by Pierre Fauchard. London: Butterworth, 1946 Translated from the Second Edition, 1746.
7. First District Dental Society, Report of Meeting, Extension for prevention. Dental Cosmos 1905; XLVII:860-69.
8. Gjermo P. The clinical trial in multi-disciplinary research. International Dental Journal 1972;27:273-278.
9. Charlton BG. A critique of Geoffrey Rose's population strategy for preventive medicine. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 1995;88:607-610.
10. Declaration of Helsinki, Recommendation for the Guidance of Medical Doctors in Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, Adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland 1964, revised by the 29th World Medical Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, 1975, 35th World Medical Assembly, Venice, and the 41st World Medical Assembly, Hong Kong, 1989.
11. Declaration of Helsinki, Recommendation for the Guidance of Medical Doctors in Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, Adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland 1964, revised by the 29th World Medical Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, 1975, 35th World Medical Assembly, Venice, and the 41st World Medical Assembly, Hong Kong, 1989.
12. Declaration of Helsinki, Recommendation for the Guidance of Medical Doctors in Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, Adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland 1964, revised by the 29th World Medical Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, 1975, 35th World Medical Assembly, Venice, and the 41st World Medical Assembly, Hong Kong, 1989.
13. Declaration of Helsinki, Recommendation for the Guidance of Medical Doctors in Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, Adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland 1964, revised by the 29th World Medical Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, 1975, 35th World Medical Assembly, Venice, and the 41st World Medical Assembly, Hong Kong, 1989.
14. Gillet GR. Ethics and dental research. Journal of Dental Research 1994;73:1766-1772.
15. Hill AB. Principles of medical statistics. The Lancet 1971; London.
16. Medical Research Council Streptomycin in Tuberculosis Trials Committee. Streptomycin treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. British Medical Journal 1948;2:769-82.
17. Hill AB. Medical ethics and controlled clinical trials. British Medical Journal 1963;1:1043-1049.
18. Doll R. Development of controlled trials in preventive and therapeutic medicine. Journal of Biosocial Science 1991;23:365-378.
19. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, et al. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal 1996;312:71-72.
20. Katz J. Experimentation with human beings. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1972.
21. Jones JH. Bad blood. New York: The Free Press, 1981.
22. World Health Organisation. Biomedical research: A revised code of ethics. WHO Chronicle 1976;30:360-62.
23. Shah RM. Towards developing a code of ethics. Journal of Dental Research 1994;73:1783-1789.
24. Council on Dental Research Ethical Guidelines for Clinical Investigation. Ethical policy of the American Dental Association regarding the use of human subjects in clinical research. Journal of the American Dental Association 1973;86: 687-89.
25. Responsibility in investigations of human subjects. London: Medical Research Council, 1963.
26. Vollman J, Winau R. History of informed medical consent. Lancet 1996;347:410 Letter to Editor.
27. Leske GS, Ripa LW. Ethical and legal considerations associated with clinical field trials. Journal of Dental Research 1980;59:1243-1253.
28. Bland M. An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
29. Bull JP. The historical development of clinical therapeutic trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases 1959;10:218-248.
30. Gore SM, Altman DG. Statistics in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
31. Weaver W. Lady Luck, the theory of probability. New York: Dover, 1982.
32. Rothman KJ. A show of confidence. New England Journal of Medicine 1978;299:1362-1363.
33. Freiman JA, Chalmers TC, Smith Jr. H, et al. The importance of beta, the type II error and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized controlled trial, New England Journal of Medicine 1978;299:690-694.
34. Getting published in the BMJ: Advice to authors. British Medical Journal 1997;314:66-8.
35. Writing for the Lancet. Lancet 1998;351:v1,p1-v1,p2.
36. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: The CONSORT statement. Journal of the American Medical Association 1996;276:637-639.
37. Research Commission. Excessive expansion of amalgam. Journal of the American Dental Association, 1942;29:292-93.
38. Phillips RW, Drexell AB, Healey HJ, et al. Clinical observations on amalgam with known physical properties: final report. Journal of the American Dental Association 1945;32:325-330.
39. Phillips RW, Avery DR, Mehra R, et al. One year observations on a composite resin for Class II restorations. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1971;26:68-77.
40. Phillips RW. Restorative resins. Dental Clinics of North America 1975;19:223-233.
41. Phillips RW, Avery DR, Mehra R, et al. Observations on a composite resin for Class II restorations: two years report. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1972;28:164-169.
42. Backer Dirks O, Baume LJ, Davies GN, et al. Principal requirements for controlled clinical trials. International Journal of Dentistry 1967;17:93-103.
43. Council on Dental Materials and Devices. Recommended standard practices for clinical evaluation of dental materials and devices. Journal of the American Dental Association 1972:84:388-90.
44. Stanford JW, Ryge G. Recommended format for protocol for clinical research program. Clinical comparison of several anterior and posterior restorative materials, International Journal of Dentistry 1977;27:46-57.
45. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. International Dental Journal 1980;30:347-358.
46. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials USPHS publication 790-244. San Francisco: Government Printing Office, 1971.
47. Allander L, Birkhed D, Bratthall D. Quality evaluation of anterior restorations in private practice. Scandinavian Dental Journal 1989;13:141-150.
48. Hellie CM, Charbeneau GT, Criag RG, et al. Quantitative evaluation of proximal tooth movement effected by wedging: a pilot study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1985;53:335-341.
49. Jordan RE, Suzuki M, Davidson DF. Clinical evaluation of a universal dentin bonding resin: preserving dentition through new materials. Journal of the American Dental Association 1993;124:71-76.
50. Jordan RE. Adhesives in dentistry - clinical considerations. Operative Dentistry 1992;5:95-102.
51. van Dijken JWV. A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer resin sandwich restorations. Acta Odontologica Scandia 1994;52:368-376.
52. Taylor DF, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, et al. Comparison of direct and indirect methods for analyzing wear of posterior composite restorations. Dental Materials 1989;5:157-160.
53. Kruelen CM, van Amerongen WE, Borgmeijer PJ, et al. Comparison of two methods for evaluating the occlusal marginal adaptation of posterior composites. Journal of Dentistry for Children 1993;59:304-309.
54. Grundy JR. An intra-oral replica technique for use with the scanning electron microscope. British Dental Journal 1971;130:113-117.
55. Leinfelder KF, Barkmeier WW, Goldberg AJ. Quantitative wear measurements of posterior composite restorations. Journal of Dental Research 1983;62:194.
56. Goldberg AJ, Rydinge E, Santucci EA, et al. Clinical evaluation methods for posterior composite restorations. Journal of Dental Research 1984;63:1387-1391.
57. Lugassy AA, Moffa JP. Laboratory model for the quantification of clinical occlusal wear. Journal of Dental Research 1985;64:63.
58. Williams DF, Cunningham J, Lalor MJ, et al. Laser techniques for the evaluation of wear in Class II restorations. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1983;10:407-414.
59. Delong R, Douglas WH. A methodology for the measurement of occlusal wear using computer graphics. Journal of Dental Research 1983;62:456.
60. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Lesaffre E, et al. Three year follow-up of five posterior composites: SEM study of differential wear. Journal of Dentistry 1993;21:79-86.
61. Ryge G, Jendresen MD, Glantz PO, et al. Standardization of clinical investigators for studies of restorative materials. Swedish Dental Journal 1981;5:235-239.
62. Horowitz HS. Evaluation of the effect of interexaminer reliability in clinical trials of dental caries prevention. Community Dental Oral Epidemiology 1983;11:384-385.
63. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment. Expansion of the acceptance program for dental materials, instruments and equipment: composite resin materials for occlusal Class I and II restorations. Journal of the American Dental Association 1981;102:349-50.
64. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment. Revised American Dental Association guidelines for submission of composite resin materials for posterior restorations. Chicago: American Dental Association, 1989.
65. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment. American Dental Association acceptance program for dentin adhesive materials and enamel and dentin adhesive materials. Chicago: American Dental Association, 1986.
66. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment. Revised American Dental Association acceptance guidelines for evaluation of dentin and enamel adhesive materials. Chicago: American Dental Association, 1991.
67. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment. Revised American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines for dentin enamel adhesive materials. Chicago: American Dental Association, 1994.
68. Randall RC, Wilson NHF. Glass ionomer restoratives: A systematic review of a secondary caries treatment effect. Journal of Dental Research 1999; in press.
69. Bassiouny MA, Grant AA. A visible light-cured composite restorative. British Dental Journal 1978;145:327-330.
70. Norman RD, Wilson NHF. Three year findings of a multiclinical trial for a posterior composite. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1988;59:577-583.
71. Wilson NHF, Norman RD. Five year findings of a multiclinical trial for a posterior composite. Journal of Dentistry 1991;19:153-159.
72. Mair L. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Quintessence International 1998;29:483-490.
73. Raskin A, Michotte-Theall B, Vreven J, Wilson NHF. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite: 10-year report. Journal of Dentistry 1998;27:13-19.
74. Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices. Official Journal of the European Communities 1993;36:L169/1-L169/43.
75. Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects, publication no. BS EN 540: 1993. London: British Standards Institute, 1993.
76. McComb D. Operative dentistry considerations for the elderly. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1994;72:517-524.
77. Richards D, Lawrence A. Evidence based dentistry. British Dental Journal 1995;178:270-273.
78. Sackett DL. The need for evidence-based medicine. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 1995;88:620-624.
79. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC. On the need for evidence-based medicine. Health Economist 1995;4:249-254.
80. Chalmers I. Unbiased relevant and reliable assessments in health care. British Medical Journal 1998;317:1167-1168.
81. Antczak-Bouckoms A, Shaw WC. The Cochrane collaboration oral health group. Journal of Dental Research 1994;73:1674-1675.
82. Davidoff F. Searching for the gold standard of evidence. ACP Observer 1995;15:17-18.
83. Mulrow CD. The medical review article: State of the science. Annals of Internal Medicine 1987;106:485-488.
84. Begg CB, Berlin JA. Publication bias: A problem in interpreting medical data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1988;151:419-463.
85. Mjör IA, Wilson NHF. General dental practice: The missing link in dental research. Journal of Dental Research 1997;76:820-821.
86. Mackie IC. Evidence based research in the primary dental care setting. British Dental Journal 1998;184:6.
87. Smith GD, Egger M. Meta-analysis: Unresolved issues and further developments. British Medical Journal 1998;316:221-225.