AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: Topics in CT: Image processing in CT

Radiographics

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 1255-1268

  Cody, Dianna D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography (CT), image processing; Image processing

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; PHYSICS; REVIEW;

HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PHYSICS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0036725269     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.22.5.g02se041255     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Baek SY, Sheafor DH, Keogan MT, DeLong DM, Nelson RC. Two-dimensional multiplanar and three-dimensional volume-rendered vascular CT in pancreatic carcinoma: interobserver agreement and comparison with standard helical techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:1467-1473.
2. Park SJ, Han JK, Kim TK, Choi BI. Three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography with minimum intensity projection in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: comparison with percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. Abdom Imaging 2001; 26:281-286.
3. Raptopoulos V, Prassopoulos P, Chuttani R, McNicholas MM, McKee JD, Kressel HY. Multiplanar CT pancreatography and distal cholangiography with minimum intensity projections. Radiology 1998; 207:317-324.
4. Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, Johnson PT, Eng J, Fishman EK. CT angiography with volume rendering for quantifying vascular stenoses: in vitro validation of accuracy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 449-455.
5. Wise SW, Hopper KD, Ten Have T, Schwartz T. Measuring carotid artery stenosis using CT angiography: the dilemma of artifactual lumen eccentricity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:919-923.
6. Caoili EM, Paulson EK, Heyneman LE, Branch MS, Eubanks WS, Nelson RC. Helical CT cholangiography with three-dimensional volume rendering using an oral biliary contrast agent: feasibility of a novel technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:487-492.
7. Coll DM, Herts BR, Davros WJ, Uzzo RG, Novick AC. Preoperative use of 3D volume rendering to demonstrate renal tumors and renal anatomy. RadioGraphics 2000; 20:431-438.
8. Hong KC, Freeny PC. Pancreaticoduodenal arcades and dorsal pancreatic artery: comparison of CT angiography with three-dimensional volume rendering, maximum intensity projection, and shaded-surface display. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:925-931.
9. Johnson PT, Halpern EJ, Kuszyk BS, et al. Renal artery stenosis: CT angiography - comparison of real-time volume-rendering and maximum intensity projection algorithms. Radiology 1999; 211: 337-343.
10. Addis KA, Hopper KD, Iyroboz TA, et al. CT angiography: in vitro comparison of five reconstruction methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:1171-1176.
11. Ebert DS, Heath DG, Kuszyk BS, et al. Evaluating the potential of problems of three-dimensional computed tomography measurements of arterial stenosis. J Digital Imaging 1998; 11:151-157.
12. Kawamoto S, Johnson PT, Fishman EK. Three-dimensional CT angiography of the thorax: clinical applications. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1998; 19:425-438.
13. Johnson PT, Fishman EK, Duckwall JR, Calhoun PS, Heath DG. Interactive three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: current applications in the thorax. RadioGraphics 1998; 18:165-187.
14. Addis KA, Hopper KD, Iyroboz TA, Kasales CJ, Liu Y, Wise SW. Optimization of shaded surface display for CT angiography. Acad Radiol 2001; 8:976-981.
15. Hopper KD, Iyriboz AT, Wise SW, Neuman JD, Mauger DT, Dasales CJ. Mucosal detail at CT virtual reality: surface versus volume rendering. Radiology 2000; 214:517-522.
16. Mile KA, Charnsangavej C, Lee FT, Fishman EK, Horton K, Lee TY. Application of CT in the investigation of angiogenesis in oncology. Acad Radiol 2000; 7:840-850.