CT angiography with volume rendering for quantifying vascular stenoses: In vitro validation of accuracy

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 173, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 449-455

  Kuszyk, Brian S ^a   Heath, David G ^a   Johnson, Pamela T ^a,b   Eng, John ^a   Fishman, Elliot K ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^b THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IN VITRO STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STENOSIS; VASCULAR DISEASE;

EID: 0032769990     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.173.2.10430152     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel SA, McDonnell CH, Jeffrey RB Jr. Three-dimensional spiral CT angiography of the abdomen: initial clinical experience. Radiology 1993;186:147-152
2. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel S, et al. Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. Radiology 1994;190: 181-189
3. Galanski M, Prokop M, Chavan A, Schaefer CM, Jandeleit K, Nischelsky JE. Renal artery stenoses: spiral CT angiography. Radiology 1993;189:185-193
4. Rubin GD, Alfrey EJ, Dake MD, et al. Assessment of living renal donors with spiral CT. Radiology 1995;195:457-462
5. Winter TC III, Freeny PC, Nghiem HV, et al. Hepatic arterial anatomy in transplantation candidates: evaluation with three-dimensional CT arteriography. Radiology 1995;195:363-370
6. Cumming MJ, Morrow IM. Carotid artery stenosis: a prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography. AJR 1994;163:517-523
7. Raptopoulos V, Rosen MP, Kent KC, Kuestner LM, Sheiman RG, Pearlman JD. Sequential helical CT angiography of aortoiliac disease. AJR 1996;166:1347-1354
8. Rieker O, Düber C, Neufang A, Pitton M, Schweden F, Thelen M. CT angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for assessment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. AJR 1997;169:1133-1138
9. Heath DG, Soyer P, Kuszyk BS, et al. Three-dimensional spiral CT during arterial portography: comparison of three rendering techniques. RadioGraphics 1995;15:1001-1011
10. Drebin RA, Carpenter L, Hanrahan P. Volume rendering. Comput Graphics 1988;22:65-74
11. Ney DR, Drebin RA, Fishman EK, Magid D. Volumetric rendering of computed tomographic data: principles and techniques. IEEE Comput Graphics Appl 1990;10:24-32
12. Fishman EK, Magid D, Ney DR, et al. Three-dimensional imaging: state of the art. Radiology 1991;181:321-337
13. Rubin GD, Beaulieu CF, Argiro V, et al. Perspective volume rendering of CT and MR images: applications for endoscopic imaging. Radiology 1996;199:321-330
14. Woodhouse CE, Ney DR, Sitzmann JV, Fishman EK. Spiral computed tomography arterial portography with three-dimensional volumetric rendering for oncologic surgery planning. Invest Radiol 1994;29:1031-1037
15. Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, Ney DR, et al. CT angiography with volume rendering: imaging findings. AJR 1995;165:445-448
16. Johnson PT, Heath DG, Kuszyk BS, Fishman EK. CT angiography with volume rendering: advantages and applications in splanchnic vascular imaging. Radiology 1996;200:564-568
17. Brink JA, Lim JT, Wang G, Heiken JP, Deyoe DA, Vannier MW. Technical optimization of spiral CT for depiction of renal artery stenosis: in vitro analysis. Radiology 1995;194:157-163
18. Cabral B, Cam N, Foran J. Accelerated volume rendering and tomographic reconstruction using texture mapping hardware. In: Kaufman A, Krueger W, eds. 1994 Symposium on Volume Visualization Proceedings. Los Alamitos: ACM/IEEE Computer Society Press, 1995:91-98
19. Wise SW, Hopper KD, Ten Have T, Schwartz T. Measuring carotid artery stenosis using CT angiography: the dilemma of artifactual lumen eccentricity. AJR 1998;170:919-923
20. Polacin A, Kalender WA, Marchal G. Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT. Radiology 1992;185:29-35
21. Ebert DS, Heath DG, Kuszyk BS, et al. Evaluating the potential and problems of three-dimensional computed tomography measurements of arterial stenosis. J Digit Imaging 1998;11:151-157
22. Schreiner S, Paschal CB, Galloway RL. Comparison of projection algorithms used for the construction of maximum intensity images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996;20:56-67