Reactions to supporters and opponents of uranium mining in relation to status, attitude similarity, and right-wing authoritarianism

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 1464-1487

  Feather, N T ^a  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036662047     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01447.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J., & Sanford, R.N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York, NY: Harper.
2. Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
3. Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4. Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religions fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113-133.
6. Carroll, J., Perkowitz, W., Lurigio, A., & Weaver, K. (1987). Sentencing goals, causal attributions, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 107-118.
7. Christie, R. (1993). Some experimental approaches to authoritarianism: II. Authoritarianism and punitiveness. In W.F. Stone, G. Lederer, & R. Christie (Eds.), Strength and weakness: The authoritarian personality today (pp. 99-118). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
8. Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
9. Feather, N.T. (1994). Attitudes toward high achievers and reactions to their fall. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 1-73). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10. Feather, N.T. (1996a). Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 571-587.
11. Feather, N.T. (1996b). Values, deservingness, and attitudes toward high achievers: Research on tall poppies. In C. Seligman, J.M. Olson, & M.P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 215-251). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Feather, N.T. (1998). Reactions to penalties for offenses committed by police and public citizens: Testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 528-544.
13. Feather, N.T. (1999a). Judgments of deservingness: Studies in the psychology of justice and achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 86-107.
14. Feather, N.T. (1999b). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
15. Feather, N.T., & Atchison, L. (1998). Reactions to an offence in relation to the status and perceived moral character of the offender. Australian Journal of Psychology, 50, 119-127.
16. Feather, N.T., & Deverson, N. (2000). Reactions to a motor-vehicle accident in relation to mitigating circumstances and the gender and moral worth of the driver. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 77-95.
17. Feather, N.T., Boeckmann, R.J., & McKee, I.R. (2001). Reactions to an offence in relation to authoritarianism, knowledge about risk, and freedom of action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 109-126.
18. Feather, N.T., & Johnstone, C. (2001). Social norms, entitlement, and deservingness: Differential reactions to the aggressive behavior of schizophrenic and personality disorder patients. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 755-767.
19. Feather, N.T., & Oberdan, D. (2000). Reactions to penalties for an offence in relation to ethnic identity, responsibility, and authoritarianism. Australian Journal of Psychology, 52, 9-16.
20. Hollander, E.P. (1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117-127.
21. Hollander, E.P. (1964). Leadership, groups, and influence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22. Kerr, N.L., Hymes, R.L., Anderson, A.B., & Weathers, J.E. (1995). Defendant-juror similarity and mock juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 545-567.
23. Levine, J.M. (1989). Reaction to opinion deviance in small groups. In P.B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 187-231). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Miller, D.T., & Vidmar, N. (1981). The social psychology of punishment reactions. In M.J. Lerner & S.C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 145-172). New York, NY: Plenum.
25. Mitchell, H.E., & Byrne, D. (1973). The defendant's dilemma: Effects of jurors' attitudes and authoritarianism on judicial decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 123-129.
26. Peterson, B.E., Doty, R.B., & Winter, D.G. (1993). Authoritarianism and attitudes toward contemporary social issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 174-184.
27. Ridgeway, C.L. (1978). Conformity, group-oriented motivation, and status attainment in small groups. Social Psychology, 41, 175-188.
28. Rohan, M.J., & Zanna, M.P. (1996). Value transmission in families. In C. Seligman, J.M. Olson, & M.P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 253-276). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Rosoff, S.M. (1989). Physicians as criminal defendants: Specialty, sanctions, and status liability. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 231-236.
30. Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
31. Schwartz, S.H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45.
32. Shaw, J.I., & Skolnick, P. (1996). When is defendant status a shield or a liability? Clarification and extension. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 431-442.
33. Skitka, L.J., & Tetlock, P.E. (1993). Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1205-1223.
34. Skolnick, P., & Shaw, J.I. (1994). Is defendant status a liability or a shield? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1827-1836.
35. Skolnick, P., & Shaw, J.I. (1997). The O.J. Simpson criminal trial verdict: Racism or status shield? Journal of Social Issues, 53, 503-516.
36. Wiggins, J.A., Dill, F., & Schwartz, R.D. (1965). On "status liability." Sociometry, 28, 197-209.