Reactions to a motor-vehicle accident in relation to mitigating circumstances and the gender and moral worth of the driver

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 77-95

  Feather, Norman T ^a   Deverson, Nicholas H ^a  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033622369     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02306.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Baldwin, M. R., & Kleinke, C. L. (1994). Effects of severity of accident, intent, and "alcoholism is a disease" excuse on judgments of a drink driver. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 2097-2109.
2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3. Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. H. (1978). Interpersonal attraction (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Darby, B. W., & Schlenker, B. R. (1989). Children's reactions to transgressions: Effects of the actor's apology, reputation, and remorse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 353-364.
5. DeJoy, D. M. (1987). Perpetrators' and servers' responsibility and punishment for drunk-driving outcomes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64, 455-460.
6. Feather, N. T. (1990). Reactions to equal reward allocations: Effects of situation, gender, and values. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 315-329.
7. Feather, N. T. (1994). Attitudes toward high achievers and reactions to their fall: Theory and research concerning tall poppies. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 1-73). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8. Feather, N. T. (1996a). Domestic violence, gender, and perceptions of justice. Sex Roles, 35, 507-519.
9. Feather, N. T. (1996b). Extending the search for order in social motivation. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 223-229.
10. Feather, N. T. (1996c). Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 571-587.
11. Feather, N. T. (1996d). Values, deservingness, and attitudes toward high achievers: Research on tall poppies. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 215-251). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Feather, N. T. (1998). Reactions to penalties for offenses committed by the police and public citizens: Testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 528-544.
13. Feather, N. T. (1999). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York, NY: Plenum.
14. Feather, N. T., & Atchison, L. (1998). Reactions to an offense in relation to the status and perceived moral character of the offender. Australian Journal of Psychology, 28, 119-127.
15. Feather, N. T., & Dawson, S. (1998). Judging deservingness and affect in relation to another's employment or unemployment: A test of a justice model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 361-381.
16. Feather, N. T., & Oberdan, D. (in press). Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to ethnic identity, responsibility, and authoritarianism. Australian Journal of Psychology.
17. Fincham, F., & Jaspars, J. (1980). Attribution of responsibility: From man the scientist to man as lawyer. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 81-138). New York, NY: Academic.
18. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Hamilton, V. L., & Hagiwara, S. (1992). Roles, responsibility, and accounts across cultures. International Journal of Psychology, 27, 157-179.
20. Hamilton, V. L., & Sanders, J. (1992). Everyday justice: Responsibility and the individual in Japan and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
22. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group process. London, UK: Routledge.
23. Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1988). The American jury on trial: Psychological perspectives. New York, NY: Hemisphere.
24. Kleinke, C. L. (1975). First impressions: The psychology of encountering others. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25. Kohlberg, L. (1984). Psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
26. N'Gbala, A., & Branscombe, N. R. (1995). Mental simulation and causal attribution: When simulating an event does not affect fault assignment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 139-162.
27. Pepitone, A., & L'Armand, K. (1996). The justice and injustice of life events. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 581-597.
28. Pliner, P., & Cappell, H. (1977). Drinking, driving, and the attribution of responsibility. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 38, 593-602.
29. Rokeach, M. (1973). The psychology of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
30. Schlenker, B. R., Britt, T. W., Pennington, J., Murphy, R., & Doherty, K. (1994). The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review, 101, 632-652.
31. Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
32. Shultz, T. R., & Darley, J. M. (1991). An information-processing model of retributive moral judgments based on "legal reasoning." In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (Vol. 2, pp. 247-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Shultz, T. R., & Schleifer, M. (1983). Towards a refinement of attribution concepts. In J. Jaspars, F. D. Fincham, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Attribution theory and research: Conceptual developmental and social dimensions (pp. 37-62). London, UK: Academic.
34. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 33-47). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
35. Taylor, C., & Kleinke, C. L. (1992). Effects of severity of accident, history of drunk driving, intent, and remorse on judgments of a drunk driver. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1641-1655.
36. Turiel, E. (1983). The development of moral knowledge: Morality and convention. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
37. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
38. Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York, NY: Guilford.
39. Weiten, W. (1980). The attraction-leniency effect injury research: An examination of external validity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 340-347.