Reactions to penalties for an offence in relation to ethnic identity, responsibility, and authoritarianism

Australian Journal of Psychology

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 9-16

  Feather, N T ^a   Oberdan, Deanna ^b  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034379577     PISSN: 00049530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00049530008255361     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J., & Sanford, R.N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
2. Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
3. Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113-133.
5. Amato, P.R. (1979). Juror-defendant similarity and the assessment of guilt in politically motivated crimes. Australian Journal of Psychology, 31, 79-88.
6. Brewer, M.B. (1993). Social identity, distinctiveness, and in-group homogeneity. Social Cognition, 11, 150-164.
7. Christie, R. (1991). Authoritarianism and related constructs. In J.P. Robinson, P.R. Shaver, & L.S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 501-571). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8. Christie, R. (1993). Some experimental approaches to authoritarianism: II. Authoritarianism and punitiveness. In W.F. Stone, G. Lederer, & R. Christie (Eds.), Strength and weakness: The authoritarian personality today (pp. 99-118). New York: Springer-Verlag.
9. Fairchild, H.H., & Cowan, G. (1997). The O.J. Simpson trial: Challenges to science and society. Journal of Social issues, 53(3), 583-591.
10. Feather, N.T. (1992). An attributional and value analysis of deservingness in success and failure situations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 125-145.
11. Feather, N.T. (1994). Values, national identification and favouritism towards the in-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 467-476.
12. Feather, N.T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influence of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1135-1151.
13. Feather, N.T. (1996a). Domestic violence, gender, and perceptions of justice. Sex Roles, 35, 507-519.
14. Feather, N.T. (1996b). Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 571-587.
15. Feather, N.T. (1996c). Values, deservingness, and attitudes toward high achievers: Research on tall poppies. In C. Seligman, J.M. Olson, & M.P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium, Volume 8. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Feather, N.T. (1998). Reactions to penalties for an offense committed by the police and public citizens: Testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 528-544.
17. Feather, N.T. (1999). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deseningness. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
18. Fincham, F., & Jaspars, J. (1980). Attribution of responsibility: From man the scientist to man as lawyer. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 81-138). New York: Academic Press.
19. Hamilton, V.L. (1978). Who is responsible? Toward a social psychology of responsibility attribution. Social Psychology, 41, 316-328.
20. Hamilton, V.L., & Sanders, J. (1992). Everyday justice: Responsibility and the individual in Japan and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21. Hinkle, S., & Brown, R. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams & M. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48-70). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
22. Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A.S.R. (1996). Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1222-1233.
23. Kerr, N.L., Hymes, R.W., Anderson, A.B., & Weathers, J.E. (1995). Defendant-juror similarity and mock juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 545-567.
24. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper.
25. Marques, J.M. (1990). The black-sheep effect: Out-group homogeneity in social comparison settings. In D. Abrams & M.A. Hogg (Eds.). Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 131-151). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
26. Marques, J.M., & Yzerbyt, V.Y. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter-and intragroup situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 287-292.
27. McConahay, J.G., Hardee, B.B., & Batts, V. (1981). Has racism declined? It depends on who's asking and what is asked. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25, 563-579.
28. Mitchell, H.E., & Byrne, D. (1973). The defendant's dilemma: Effects of jurors' attitudes and authoritarianism unjudicial decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology; 25, 123-129.
29. Oakes, P.J., Haslam, S.A., & Turner, J.C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford: Blackwell.
30. Pettigrew, T.F., & Meertens, R.W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57-75.
31. Rector, N.A., & Bagby, R.M. (1997). Minority juridic decision making. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 69-81.
32. Robinson, P.H., & Darley, J.M. (1995). Justice, liability, and blame. Boulder, CO: Westview.
33. Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.
34. Shultz, T.R., & Darley, J.M. (1991). An information processing model of retributive justice based on &legal reasoning&. In W.M. Kurtines & J.L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Vol. 2. Research (pp. 247-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Shaver, K.G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.
36. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W.G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology and intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
37. Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.