Clinical evaluation of two adhesive composite cements for the suppression of dentinal cold sensitivity

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 50-53

  Sensat, Michelle L ^a   Brackett, William W ^a   Meinberg, Trudy A ^a   Beatty, Mark W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; PHOSPHORIC ACID; RESIN; TOOTH CEMENT; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; LINKMAX; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RELYX ARC; RESIN CEMENT; SINGLE BOND;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLD SENSITIVITY; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTIN; DESENSITIZATION; FISHER EXACT TEST; HUMAN; POLYMERIZATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TEMPERATURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; FOLLOW UP; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICS;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COLD; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS;

EID: 0036632506     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(02)00048-3     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Kern M, Kleimeier B, Schaller HG, Strub JR. Clinical comparison of postoperative sensitivity for a glass ionomer and a zinc phosphate luting cement J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:159-62.
2. Metz JE, Brackett WW. Performance of a glass ionomer luting cement over 8 years in a general practice. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:13-5.
3. Christensen GJ. Resin cements and postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:1197-9.
4. Ling TY, Gillam DG. The effectiveness of desensitizing agents for the treatment of cervical dentine sensitivity (CDS) - a review. J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr 1996;44:5-12.
5. Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D. Dentine hypersensitivity. A study of the patency of dentinal tubules in sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentin. J Clin Periodontol 1987;14:280-4.
6. Pashley DH. Strategies for clinical evaluation of drugs and/or devices for the alleviation of hypersensitive dentin. In: Rowe NH, editor. Proceedings of symposium on hypersensitive dentin. Origin and management. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan; 1985. p. 65-88.
7. Brannstrom M. The hydrodynamic theory of dentinal pain: sensation in preparations, caries, and the dentinal crack syndrome. J Endod 1986;12: 453-7.
8. Pashley D. Dentin permeability, dentin sensitivity, and treatment through tubule occlusion. J Endod 1986;12:465-74.
9. Davidson DF, Suzuki M. The Gluma bonding system: a clinical evaluation of its various components for the treatment of hypersensitive root dentin. J Can Dent Assoc 1997;63:38-41.
10. Dondi dall'Orologio G, Lorenzi R, Anselmi M, Opisso V. Dentin desensitizing effects of Gluma Alternate, Health-Dent Desensitizer and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. Am J Dent 1999;12:103-6.
11. Calamia JR, Styner DL, Rattet AH. Effect of Amalgambond on cervical sensitivity. Am J Dent 1995;8:283-4.
12. Davidson DF, Suzuki M. The Gluma bonding system: a clinical evaluation of its various components for the treatment of hypersensitive root dentin. J Can Dent Assoc 1997;63:38-41.
13. Wat P, Cheung GS. Incidence of post-operative sensitivity following indirect porcelain onlay restorations: preliminary results. Asian J Aesthet Dent 1995;3:3-7.
14. Kennington LB, Davis RD, Murchison DF, Langenderfer WR. Short-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity with bonded amalgams. Am J Dent 1998;11:177-80.
15. Felton DA, Bergenholtz G, Kanoy BE. Evaluation of the desensitizing effect of Gluma Dentin Bond on teeth prepared for complete-coverage restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:292-8.
16. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Kugel G, Davidson CL. Clinical evaluation of a one-bottle bonding system for desensitizing exposed roots. Am J Dent 1999;12:243-9.
17. Walline BW, Wagner JG, Marx DB, Reinhardt RA. Comparison of methods for measuring root and mucogingival sensitivity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:641-6.