Dentin desensitizing effects of Gluma Alternate, Health-Dent Desensitizer and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 103-106

  Dondi Dall'Orologio, Giovanni ^a   Lorenzi, Roberta ^b   Anselmi, Marina ^b   Opisso, Valentina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENZALKONIUM; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLUMA DESENSITIZER; GLUTARALDEHYDE; HEALTH DENT DESENSITIZER; HEALTH-DENT DESENSITIZER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; BENZALKONIUM COMPOUNDS; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; GLUTARAL; HUMANS; MALE; METHACRYLATES; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; RESIN CEMENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0033138429     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Brännström M, Åström A. The hydrodynamics of dentin: Its possible relationship to dentinal pain. Int Dent J 1972; 22: 219-223.
2. Scherman A, Jacobsen PL. Managing dentin hypersensitivity: What treatment to recommend to patients. J Am Dent Assoc 1992; 123: 57-61.
3. Grossman LE. The treatment of hypersensitive dentin. J Am Dent Assoc 1935;22: 592-602.
4. Krauser JT. Hypersensitive teeth. Part II: Treatment. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 56: 307-311.
5. Pashley DH. Dentin permeability, dentin sensitivity, and treatment through tubule occlusion. J Endodont, 1986; 12: 465-474.
6. Watanabe T, Sano M, Itoh K, et al. The effects of primers on the sensitivity of dentin. Dent Mater 1991;7:148-150.
7. Tagami J, Nakajima M, Hosoda H. Influence of dentin primers on fluid flow of bovine serum through dentin. Archs Oral Biol 1994; 39 (Suppl):146S.
8. Dondi dall'Orologio G, Malferrari S. Desensitizing effects of Gluma and Gluma 2000 on hypersensitive dentin. Am J Dent 1993; 6: 283-286.
9. Dijkman GEHM, Jongebloed WL, de Vries J, et al. Closing of dentinal tubules by glutardialdehyde treatment. A scanning electron microscopy study. Scand J Dent Res 1994;102:144-150.
10. Schüpbach P, Lutz F, Finger WJ. Closing of dentinal tubules by Gluma Desensitizer. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105:414-421.
11. Collaert B, Fischer C. Dentin hypersensitivity: A review. Endod Dent Traumatol 1991;7:145-152.
12. Dayton RE, DeMarco TJ, Swedlove D. Treatment of hypersensitive root surfaces with dental adhesive material. J Periodontol 1974; 45: 873-878.
13. Brännström M, Nordenval KJ. The effect of acid etching on enamel, dentin and the inner surface of resin restoration. J Dent Res 1977;56: 917-920.
14. Emling RC. Historical overview of causes and treatments of dental hypersensitivity. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1982; Suppl 3: S92-94.
15. Greenhill JD, Pashley DH. The effect of desensitizing agents on the hydraulic conductance of human dentin in vitro. J Dent Res 1981;60: 686-698.
16. Ong G. Desensitizing agents: A review. Clin Prev Dent 1986; 8: 14-18.
17. Kerns DA, McQuade MJ, Scheidt MJ, et al. Effectiveness of sodium fluoride on tooth hypersensitivity with and without iontophoresis. J Periodontol 1989; 60: 386-389.
18. Ide M, Morel AD, Wilson RF, et al. The role of a dentin bonding agent in reducing cervical dentin sensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 1998; 25:268-290.