The evolution of a climate regime: Kyoto to Marrakech and beyond

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 195-206

  Babiker, Mustafa H ^a   Jacoby, Henry D ^b   Reilly, John M ^c   Reiner, David M ^c  

^a Arab Planning Institute   (Kuwait)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Emissions trading; Kyoto Protocol; Marrakech accords; Non CO2 gases

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; ARTICLE; CANADA; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GREENHOUSE GAS; JAPAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; UKRAINE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036621503     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1462-9011(02)00035-7     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Argentine Republic, 1999. Revision of the First National Communication, Submission to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Buenos Aires, October.
2. Babiker, M.H., Reilly, J.M., Ellerman, A.D., 2000. Japan nuclear power and the Kyoto Agreement. J. Jpn. Int. Econ. 14, 169-188.
3. Babiker, M.H., Reilly, J.M., Mayer, M., Eckaus, R., Sue Wing, I., Hyman, R., 2001a. The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model: Revisions, Sensitivities, and Comparison of Results, report no. 71. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change. Cambridge, MA, February.
4. Babiker, M.H., Viguier, L., Reilly, J.M., Ellerman A.D., Criqui, P., 2001b. The Welfare Costs of Hybrid Carbon Policies in the European Union, report no. 74, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change. Cambridge, MA, June.
5. Bohringer, C., 2001. Climate Politics from Kyoto to Bonn: From Little to Nothing?!? Working Paper. Center for European Economic Research, Mannheim, Germany.
6. Bolin, B., 1998. The Kyoto negotiations on climate change: a science perspective. Science 279, 330-331.
7. Den Elzen, M., de Moor, A., 2001. Evaluating the Bonn Agreement and Some Key Issues, Climate Change Policy Support Project. Dutch Ministry of Environment, RIVM Report 728001016/2001.
8. Downs, G., Rocke, D., Barsoom, P., 1996. Is the good news about compliance good news for cooperation? Int. Organ. 50, 379-406.
9. Ellerman, A.D., Sue Wing, I., 2000. Supplementarity: an invitation to monopsony? Ener. J. 21, 29-59.
10. EIA, 2000. International Energy Outlook 2000, report no. DOE/EIA-0484. Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy, March 2000.
11. Frankel, J., 1999. Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Policy Brief no. 52. Brookings Institution, June.
12. Grubb, M., Vrolijk, C., Brack, D., 1999. The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and Assessment. Royal Institute of International Affairs, London.
13. Hamilton, C., Vellen, L., 1999. Land-use change in Australia and the Kyoto Protocol. Environ. Sci. Policy 2, 145-152.
14. Hertel, T., 1997. Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15. Hyman, R., 2001. A More Cost-Effective Strategy for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Modeling the Impact of Methane Abatement Opportunities, M.S. Thesis in Technology and Policy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. IEA, 2001. Energy Balances of OECD Countries 1997-1999, Paris, France.
17. 2 Emissions, Working Paper. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, 1-12 October.
18. Nordhaus, W., 2001. Global warming economics. Science 294, 1283-1284.
19. OECD, 2001. OECD In Figures: Statistics of the Member Countries, 2001 Edition. Paris, France.
20. Reilly, J.M., Prinn, R., Harnisch, J., Fitzmaurice, J., Jacoby, H., Kicklighter, D., Melillo, J., Stone, P., Sokolov, A., Wang, C., 1999. Multigas assessment of the Kyoto Protocol. Nature 401, 549-555.
21. Reilly, J.M., Jacoby, H., Prinn, R., 2001. Multi-Gas Contributors to Global Climate Change, Draft in preparation. Pew Center for Global Climate Change, Washington, DC.
22. Schlamadinger, B., Marland, G., 2000. Land Use and Global Climate Change: Forests, Land Management, and the Kyoto Protocol. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Washington, DC, June.
23. Schleich, J., Eichhammer, W., Boede, U., Gagelmann, F., Jochem, E., Scholmann, B., Ziesing, H.J., 2001. Greenhouse gas reductions in Germany: lucky strike or hard work? Climate Policy 1, 363-389.
24. USGS, 2000. USGS World Petroleum Assessment 2000, USGS Fact Sheet FS-070-00 (April), US Department of Interior, USGS, Washington DC.
25. UNFCCC, 2001a. Kyoto Protocol: Status of Ratification, Updated: 11 December 2001 (http://www.unfccc.int/resource/kpstats.pdf).
26. UNFCCC, 2001b. The Marrakech Accords and the Marrakech Declaration, UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (http://www.unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop7/13.pdf).
27. Viguier, L., Babiker, M.H., Reilly, J.M., 2001. Carbon Emissions and The Kyoto Commitment in the European Union, report no. 70. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change. Cambridge, MA, February.
28. Watson, H., 2001. Remarks by Dr. Harlan L. Watson, Senior Negotiator and Special Representative of the US Department of State to the Fundacion Gas Natural and Spain's Ministry of Environment. In: Proceedings of the Seminar on Climate Change: International Agreements and Mitigation Alternatives, 29 November, Madrid, Spain.
29. White House, 2002. US Climate Strategy: A New Approach. Policy Briefing Book. Washington, DC, February.