Multi-gas assessment of the Kyoto protocol

Nature

Volumn 401, Issue 6753, 1999, Pages 549-555

  Reilly, J ^a   Prinn, R ^a   Harnisch, J ^a   Fitzmaurice, J ^a   Jacoby, H ^a   Kicklighter, D ^b   Melillo, J ^b   Stone, P ^a   Sokolov, A ^a   Wang, C ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b ECOSYSTEMS CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EXHAUST GAS; GLOBAL CLIMATE; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; JAPAN; POLICY; POLLUTION CONTROL; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0033533849     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/44069     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adams, R. M., Chang, C., McCarl, B. & Callaway, J. in Global Change: Economic Issues in Agriculture, Forestry, and Natural Resources (eds Reilly, J. & Anderson, M.) 273-287 (Westview, Boulder, CO, 1992).
2. Richards, K. R. in Global Change: Economic Issues in Agriculture, Forestry, and Natural Resources (eds Reilly, J. & Anderson, M.) 288-310 (Westview, Boulder, CO, 1992).
3. Cook, E. Lifetime Commitments: Why Policy-makers Can't Afford to Overlook Fully Fluorinated Compounds (World Resources Institute, Washington DC, 1995).
4. Harnisch, J. & Prinn, R. G. Sulfur hexafluoride emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 4, 56a (1999).
5. Harnisch, J., Sue Wing, I., Jacoby, H. D. & Prinn, R. G. in Extraction and Processing Division Congr. 1999 (ed. Mishra, B.) 797-815 (The Minerals, Metals and Materials Soc., Warrendale, PA, 1999).
6. Victor, D. G. & MacDonald, G. J. Future Emissions of Sulfur Hexafluoride and Perfluorocarbons: Implications for Global Policy and Verifying Compliance with the Kyoto Protocol (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, 1998).
7. Victor, D. G. & MacDonald, G. J. A model for estimating future emissions of sulfur hexafluoride and perfluorocarbons. Clim. Change (in the press).
8. 2 content. Nature 395, 881-884 (1998).
9. Wigley, T. M., Richels, R. & Edmonds, J. A. Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of climate. Nature 379, 240-243 (1996).
10. Nordhaus, W. D. Managing the Global Commons 49-74 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994).
11. Hourcade, J. C. et al. in Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change (eds Bruce, J. P. et al.) 297-366 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996).
12. Prinn, R. et al. Integrated global system model for climate policy assessment: feedbacks and sensitivity studies. Clim. Change 41, 469-546 (1999).
13. Reilly, J. et al. Multi-Gas Assessment of the Kyoto Protocol (MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 45, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1999).
14. Yang, Z. et al. The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model (MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 6, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1996).
15. Wang, C., Prinn, R. G. & Sokolov, A. A global interactive chemistry climate model: formulation and testing. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 3399-3417 (1998).
16. Sokolov, A. P. & Stone, P. H. A flexible climate model for use in integrated assessment. Clim. Dyn. 14, 291-303 (1998).
17. Xiao, X. et al. Transient climate change and net ecosystem production of the terrestrial biosphere. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 12, 345-360 (1998).
18. Schimel, D. et al. in Climate Change 1995: the Science of Climate Change (eds Houghton, J. T. et al.) 65-131 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996).
19. Fan, S. et al. A large terrestrial carbon sink in North America implied by atmospheric and oceanic carbon dioxide data and models. Science 282, 442-446 (1998).
20. Schneider, S. H. Detecting climatic change signals: are there any fingerprints? Science 263, 341-347 (1994).
21. Eckaus, R. Comparing the effects of greenhouse gas emissions on global warming. Energy J. 13, 25-34 (1992).
22. Reilly, J. & Richards, K. Climate change damage and the trace gas index issue. Environ. Resour. Econ. 3, 41-61 (1993).
23. Schmalensee, R. Comparing greenhouse gases for policy purposes. Energy J. 14, 245-235 (1993).
24. Reilly, J. in Economics and Policy Issues in Climate Change (ed. Nordhaus, W. D.) 243-256 (Resources for the Future, Washington DC, 1998).
25. Lind, R. & Schuler, R. in Economics and Policy Issues in Climate Change (ed. Nordhaus, W. D.) 59-96 (Resources for the Future, Washington DC, 1998).
26. Energy Information Administration (EIA) International Energy Outlook (Rep. No. DOE/EIA-0484(99)); (http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo99).
27. Nilsson, S. & Schopfhauser, W. The carbon-sequestration potential of a global afforestation program. Clim. Change 30, 267-293 (1994).
28. 2 Gases 1-17 (Methane and Utilities Branch, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, 1999).
29. US Environmental Protection Agency, Methane Branch. Costs of Reducing Methane Emissions in the United States 1-92 (1999);http://www.epa.gov/ghginfo
30. Cole, V. et al. in Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations, and Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Watson, R. et al.) 726-771 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996).
31. Denbaly, M. & Vroomen, H. Dynamic fertilizer nutrient demands for corn: a cointegrated and error-correction system. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 75 (1) (1993).
32. Fernandez-Cornejo, J. Demand and Substitution of Agricultural Inputs in the Central Cornbelt States (Rep. TB-1816, US Dept of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, 1993).
33. 3, HFC-23) in the background atmosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 35-38 (1998).
34. McCulloch, A. Future consumption and emissions of hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) alternatives to CFCs: comparison of estimates using top-down and bottom-up approaches. Environ. Int. 21, 353-362 (1995).
35. 6, trends, sources and prospects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 3077-3086 (1998).
36. de Jager, D., Hendriks, C. A., Heijnes, H. A. M. & Blok, K. in Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (eds Eliasson, B., Riemer, P. W. F. & Wokaun, A.) 503-508 (Pergamon, New York, 1999).
37. 2 limits: economic adjustments and the distribution of burdens. Energy J. 18 (3), 31-58 (1997).
38. US DOE Interlaboratory Working Group, Scenarios of US Carbon Reductions (Office of Efficiency and Renewable Energy, US Dept of Energy, Washington DC, 1997).
39. Jacoby, H. The uses and misuses of technology development as a component of climate policy 1-16 (MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 43, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1998).
40. 2 abatement policies. Resour. Energy Econ. 21, 211-253 (1999).
41. Wang, C. & Prinn, R. G. Impact of emissions, chemistry, and climate on atmospheric carbon monoxide: 100-year predictions from a global chemistry-climate model. Chemosphere (in the press); (also as the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change Report No. 35, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1998).
42. Daily, G. C. (ed.) Daily Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems (Island Press, Washington DC, 1997).
43. Melillo, J. M. Warm, warm on the range. Science 283, 183-184 (1999).
44. Cao, M. & Woodward, F. I. Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change. Nature 393, 249-252 (1998).
45. Smith, T. M. & Shugart, H. H. The transient response of terrestrial carbon storage to a perturbed climate. Nature 361, 523-526 (1993).
46. Woodwell, G. M. et al. in Biotic Feedbacks in the Global Climatic System (eds Woodwell, G. M. & Mackenzie, F. T.) 393-411 (Oxford Univ. Press, NY, 1995).
47. Foley, J. A. et al. Feedbacks between climate and boreal forests during the mid-Holocene. Nature 371, 52-54 (1994).