Peer Review and Innovation

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 99-108

  Spier, Raymond E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Grant applications; Innovation; Journal publication; Peer review; Prizes; Referees

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ETHICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; MASS COMMUNICATION; PEER REVIEW; PUBLISHING;

DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; ETHICS; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PUBLICATION BIAS; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH SUPPORT;

EID: 0036358324     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-002-0035-0     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Armstrong, J.Scott (1997) Peer Review for Journals: Evidence of Quality Control, Fairness and Innovation, Science and Engineering Ethics 3(1): 63-84.
2. Roy, R. and Ashburn, J.R. (2001) The Perils of Peer Review, Nature 414 : 393-394
3. Fletcher, R.H. and Fletcher, S.W. (1997) Evidence for the Effectiveness of Peer Review, Science and Engineering Ethics 3(1): 35-50.
4. Stamps III, A.E. (1997) Advances in Peer Review Research: An Introduction Science and Engineering Ethics 3(1): 3-10.
5. Marshall, E. (1997) NIH plans peer-review overhaul, Science 276: 888-889.
6. McCullough, J. (1993) in: Eds Wood, F.Q. and V.L. Meek, Research grants management and funding,. Pub. Bibliotech, ANUTECH Pty Ltd, Canberra, Australia, p. 212.
7. Kostoff, R.N. (1997) The Principles and Practice of Peer Review; Science and Engineering Ethics 3(1):19-34.
8. May, R. (1998) Making room for innovative flair. ESPRC Newsline Special Issue July 1998, published by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Swindon UK, pp. 10-11; (http://www.esprc.ac.uk).
9. Cole, S., Cole, J.R. & Simon, G.A. (1981) Chance and consensus in peer review; Science 214: 881-886.
10. Baldwin, W. and Seto, B. (1997) Peer Review: Selecting the Best Science, Science and Engineering Ethics 3(1): 11-18.
11. Spier, R.E. (1998) Ethics and the Funding of Research and Development at Universities, Science and Engineering Ethics 4(3): 375-384.
12. Horrobin, D. (1996) Peer review of grant applications: a harbinger for mediocrity in clinical research? Lancet 348: 1293-1295.
13. Horrabin, D. (1990) The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation. The Journal of the American Medical Association 263: 1438-1441.
14. Horrobin, D. (1986) Glittering prizes for research support, Nature 32: 221.
15. Glass, B. (1966) Science and Ethical Values, Oxford University Press, London, p. 89.